Systemic treatment with capecitabine as maintenance therapy in patients with recurring or metastatic breast cancer: experience in the Oncology Hospital, National Medical Center Siglo XXI, Mexican Social Security Institute

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Segura-González ◽  
Miguel Quintana-Quintana
2015 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. vi3
Author(s):  
S. Moroso ◽  
M. Bonotto ◽  
L. Gerratana ◽  
G. Arpino ◽  
C. De Angelis ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 493-497
Author(s):  
Giandomenico Roviello ◽  
Edoardo Francini ◽  
Armando Perrella ◽  
Letizia Laera ◽  
Maria Antonietta Mazzei ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 643-654
Author(s):  
Anna Rachelle Mislang ◽  
Laura Biganzoli ◽  
Etienne Brain

Author(s):  
Duman BB ◽  
Cil T

Alteration of biomarkers is well-documented in breast cancer at locoregional recurrence or metastasis attributed to tumor heterogeneity and change in biology. There is some data about discordance between primary and metastatic sites. At the same time hormone, receptor status can change after neoadjuvant treatment and at the time of recurrence. Metastatic breast cancer without progression or recurrence after the targeted chemotherapy combination for planning maintenance therapy in Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression positive hormone receptors positive or triple-negative patient after chemotherapy. In guidelines, the time of rebiopsy has no exact time, if the time of biopsy is usually after the progression of the tumor. We presented cases in which we detected different hormone receptor statuses from the beginning without progression and before deciding on maintenance therapy. This subject is important for deciding therapy in the aspect of heterogeneous tumors like breast cancer. The important decision of rebiopsy time is debate. In this aspect, these two cases are important examples for these kinds of patients tumor heterogeneity in breast cancer is one of the most widely known entities. We found that two patients, one of whom was estrogen progesterone receptor negative HER2 3 (+++) at the time of diagnosis and the other who was triple negative at the time of diagnosis, had positive hormone receptors in the re-biopsies without progression. We aimed to discuss the tumor heterogeneity and timing of rebiopsy in breast cancer in the light of two cases.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12025-e12025
Author(s):  
M. Suzuki ◽  
I. Kimijima ◽  
M. Ishii

e12025 Background: Capecitabine (X) is converted into 5-FU by thymidine phospholylase (TP). Cyclophosphamide (C) has been shown to make TP higher in the preclinical study. Therefore, the combination of capecitabine and cyclophosphamide (XC) is thought to have a synergistic activity. We explored the efficacy of XC for metastatic breast cancer patients. Methods: 50 metastatic breast cancer patients were treated with XC in our medical center between April 2004 and December 2008. Median patient age was 58 years old (range: 34–79 years old). 36 patients were postmenopausal. X was 1675mg/m2 days 1–21 and C was 67mg/m2 days 1–14 on a 28-day cycle in all-oral combination. This therapy was continued until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicities occurring. Results: Median time to treatment failure was 28 weeks (range: 2–158 weeks). 9 patients were not evaluable for tumor response. Among 41 evaluable patients, complete response (CR) was observed in 2.4% (1 patient) and partial response (PR) was 29.2% (12 patients). Stable disease (SD) was 41.4% (17 patients) and progression of the disease (PD) was 26.8% (11 patients). The objective response rate (CR+PR) was 31.7% and the overall clinical benefit (CR+PR+SDÅÜ24 weeks) was 53.6%. Significant toxicities were uncommon: grade 3 toxicities were encountered for neutropenia in 1 patient, anorexia in 1 patient and hand-foot syndrome in 2 patients. Conclusions: XC is an effective regimen in metastatic breast cancer, and this therapy is of an easy administration and very well tolerated. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1088-1088
Author(s):  
Yunfang Yu ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Quanlong Gao ◽  
Qiyun Ou ◽  
Dagui Lin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (8) ◽  
pp. 1026-1026
Author(s):  
Glauce Romeiro de Almeida ◽  
Antônio Silvinato ◽  
Wanderley Marques Bernardo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document