An approach to one-dimensional elliptic quasi-exactly solvable models

Pramana ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 575-585
Author(s):  
M. A. Fasihi ◽  
M. A. Jafarizadeh ◽  
M. Rezaei
1994 ◽  
Vol 09 (16) ◽  
pp. 1501-1505 ◽  
Author(s):  
O.B. ZASLAVSKII

It is shown that the particular class of one-dimensional quasi-exactly solvable models can be constructed with the help of infinite-dimensional representation of Lie algebra. Hamiltonian of a system is expressed in terms of SU(1,1) generators.


1990 ◽  
Vol 04 (05) ◽  
pp. 871-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. KLÜMPER

We study the excitations of two-dimensional classical vertex models and related one-dimensional quantum Hamiltonians. The main mathematical means we use are functional equations which are set up and solved for the excitation functions. The method is first applied to the eight-vertex model as a prototype and compared with the traditional solution procedure of the Bethe Ansatz. In the last part we investigate some q-state models, notably the biquadratic spin-1 quantum antiferromagnet and its generalizations, which recently attracted interest due to Haldane’s conjecture.


Open Physics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Downing

AbstractWe present a class of confining potentials which allow one to reduce the one-dimensional Schrödinger equation to a named equation of mathematical physics, namely either Bessel’s or Whittaker’s differential equation. In all cases, we provide closed form expressions for both the symmetric and antisymmetric wavefunction solutions, each along with an associated transcendental equation for allowed eigenvalues. The class of potentials considered contains an example of both cusp-like single wells and a double-well.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-261
Author(s):  
Angel Ricardo Plastino ◽  
Gustavo Luis Ferri ◽  
Angelo Plastino

We employ two different Lipkin-like, exactly solvable models so as to display features of the competition between different fermion–fermion quantum interactions (at finite temperatures). One of our two interactions mimics the pairing interaction responsible for superconductivity. The other interaction is a monopole one that resembles the so-called quadrupole one, much used in nuclear physics as a residual interaction. The pairing versus monopole effects here observed afford for some interesting insights into the intricacies of the quantum many body problem, in particular with regards to so-called quantum phase transitions (strictly, level crossings).


1998 ◽  
Vol 238 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 213-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranjan Kumar Ghosh ◽  
Sumathi Rao

2004 ◽  
Vol 243 (1-6) ◽  
pp. 131-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Dukelsky ◽  
G.G. Dussel ◽  
S. Pittel

2001 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Alimohammadi ◽  
M. Khorrami ◽  
A. Aghamohammadi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document