scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Middle Meatus Antrostomy with or Without Partial Middle Turbinectomy

2010 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 400-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Gulati ◽  
Raman Wadhera ◽  
Arvind Kumar ◽  
Anshu Gupta ◽  
Ajay Garg ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Vol 113 (12) ◽  
pp. 2148-2150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey L. Cutler ◽  
James A. Duncavage ◽  
Keith Matheny ◽  
Jenny L. Cross ◽  
Murat C. Miman ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
pp. 416???420 ◽  
Author(s):  
William E. Davis ◽  
Jerry W. Templer ◽  
William R. LaMear

1991 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
pp. 416-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
William E. Davis ◽  
Jerry W. Templer ◽  
William R. LaMear

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-42
Author(s):  
Kumari Radha M. N ◽  
Anju Unnikrishnan ◽  
Manju N

Background: Aim: To assess efficacy of functional endoscopic sinus surgery in surgical management of ethmoid polyps.Methods:One hundred twelve adult patients age ranged 18- 38 years of either gender with ethmoid polyps underwent FESS under general anesthesia. The extent of surgery was decided based on the findings in pre-operative CT scan of paranasal sinuses. Anterior ethmoidectomy, posterior ethmoidectomy, middle meatus antrostomy and clearance of frontal recess were performed in all the patients. Five functional criteria were evaluated as nasalobstruction , anosmia, rhinorrhea, post nasal drip, head ache and facial pain.Results:Pre- operative nasal obstruction percentage was 3.42 and post- operative ercentage was 2.10, Anosmia percentage was 2.14 and 1.15, Rhinorrhea percentage was 3.56 and 2.08 and ocular problem in 1 and synechia in 4 cases.Conclusions:Functional endoscopic sinus surgery found to be effective in management of ethmoid polyps and hence can be the treatment of choice.


1986 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 362-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna M. Risberg ◽  
Robyn M. Cox

A custom in-the-ear (ITE) hearing aid fitting was compared to two over-the-ear (OTE) hearing aid fittings for each of 9 subjects with mild to moderately severe hearing losses. Speech intelligibility via the three instruments was compared using the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) test. The relationship between functional gain and coupler gain was compared for the ITE and the higher rated OTE instruments. The difference in input received at the microphone locations of the two types of hearing aids was measured for 10 different subjects and compared to the functional gain data. It was concluded that (a) for persons with mild to moderately severe hearing losses, appropriately adjusted custom ITE fittings typically yield speech intelligibility that is equal to the better OTE fitting identified in a comparative evaluation; and (b) gain prescriptions for ITE hearing aids should be adjusted to account for the high-frequency emphasis associated with in-the-concha microphone placement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document