Neurofibromatosis 2: Primary Modality of Hearing Rehabilitation with Cochlear Implant

Author(s):  
Dathathri Anantaramaiah Halyur ◽  
Praveen H. Rayanagoudar ◽  
Apurva Kumar ◽  
Sunil Narayan Dutt
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Gröger ◽  
M Leinung ◽  
A Loth ◽  
S Helbig ◽  
T Stöver

1999 ◽  
Vol 113 (5) ◽  
pp. 458-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Graham ◽  
C. Lynch ◽  
B. Weber ◽  
L. Stollwerck ◽  
J. Wei ◽  
...  

AbstractWe present our experience using the Clarion® magnetless multichannel cochlear implant with a woman profoundly deafened following bilateral acoustic neuromata as a consequence of neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2). The right neuroma had been previously removed without an attempt at neural preservation. On the left, however, a posterior fossa approach had been taken with the aim of preserving hearing. Although the left cochlear nerve appeared to be undamaged at the end of the operation, no hearing thresholds could be elicited on post-operative audiometry, because of damage either to the cochlear nerve or to the blood supply to the cochlea. Round window electrical stimulation subsequently produced a perception of sound, confirming that the cochlear nerve was capable of functioning and that a cochlear implant would be effective. Because she would need regular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to monitor existing and future NF2 lesions, it was decided to use a magnetless Clarion® implant, which has been shown to be MRI compatible. We report our experience of using the device in this case and discuss some of the issues related to the provision of cochlear implants to patients with NF2.


2021 ◽  
pp. 31-37
Author(s):  
Susana Andrade ◽  
Jorge Humberto Martins

2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 538-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oswaldo Laércio M Cruz ◽  
Eduardo A. S Vellutini

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Borsetto ◽  
Amy Hammond-Kenny ◽  
James R. Tysome ◽  
Patrick R. Axon ◽  
Neil P. Donnelly ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 295-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Querat ◽  
Hung Thai-Van ◽  
Denis Vital Durand ◽  
François Cotton ◽  
Stéphane Gallego ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3S) ◽  
pp. 631-637
Author(s):  
Katja Lund ◽  
Rodrigo Ordoñez ◽  
Jens Bo Nielsen ◽  
Dorte Hammershøi

Purpose The aim of this study was to develop a tool to gain insight into the daily experiences of new hearing aid users and to shed light on aspects of aided performance that may not be unveiled through standard questionnaires. Method The tool is developed based on clinical observations, patient experiences, expert involvement, and existing validated hearing rehabilitation questionnaires. Results An online tool for collecting data related to hearing aid use was developed. The tool is based on 453 prefabricated sentences representing experiences within 13 categories related to hearing aid use. Conclusions The tool has the potential to reflect a wide range of individual experiences with hearing aid use, including auditory and nonauditory aspects. These experiences may hold important knowledge for both the patient and the professional in the hearing rehabilitation process.


2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (12) ◽  
pp. 4325-4326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hartmut Meister ◽  
Katrin Fuersen ◽  
Barbara Streicher ◽  
Ruth Lang-Roth ◽  
Martin Walger

Purpose The purpose of this letter is to compare results by Skuk et al. (2020) with Meister et al. (2016) and to point to a potential general influence of stimulus type. Conclusion Our conclusion is that presenting sentences may give cochlear implant recipients the opportunity to use timbre cues for voice perception. This might not be the case when presenting brief and sparse stimuli such as consonant–vowel–consonant or single words, which were applied in the majority of studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document