15074 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy has demonstrated small but significant survival benefit in locally advanced gastric cancer in several meta-analyses, while adjuvant CITX showed improved outcome of patients (pts) compared to chemotherapy alone in a few trials. However, optimal chemotherapy regimen remains to be determined. We conducted a randomized trial comparing oral (PO) CITX with intravenous (IV) CITX in gastric cancer pts with curative resection. Methods: All enrolled pts underwent radical surgery with at least D2 dissection. After stratification for pathologic stage (IB or II vs. III) and primary tumor size (=5 cm vs. >5 cm), pts were randomized to IV CITX (5-FU 500 mg/m2 weekly for 24 weeks, MMC 8 mg/m2 every 6 weeks x 4) or PO CITX (UFT 400–600 mg/day for 12 months). Pts in both arms received PSK 3 g/day PO for 4 months. The planned target number of pts was 368 to prove the non-inferiority of PO CITX compared to IV CITX in overall survival. Results: A total of 82 pts (stage IB: 6, II: 29, IIIA: 30, IIIB: 17; 44 in IV arm, 38 in PO arm) were enrolled between May 2002 and October 2005, when the trial was closed due to poor accrual. Pts characteristics were well balanced. With a median follow-up of 39 months (14–55 months) in survivors, there were no significant differences in 3-year disease-free survival (82% vs. 61%, p=0.302) and overall survival (84% vs. 79%, p=0.838) between IV and PO arms. No grade 4 toxicity was observed in both arms. IV arm demonstrated higher incidence of grade 2 or 3 neutropenia (79% vs. 52%, p=0.025), thrombocytopenia (19% vs. 0%, p=0.008), and vomiting (36% vs. 9%, p=0.013). Conclusions: Although accrual was well below that planned, the results of this trial suggest that PO CITX with UFT might have similar efficacy with lower toxicity profile compared with 5-FU and MMC CITX in adjuvant treatment for gastric cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.