scholarly journals Recovery of Salt Marsh Invertebrates Following Habitat Restoration: Implications for Marsh Restoration in the Northern Gulf of Mexico

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 1711-1721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Baumann ◽  
Gail F. Fricano ◽  
Katie Fedeli ◽  
Claire E. Schlemme ◽  
Mary C. Christman ◽  
...  

Abstract Recovery following salt marsh restoration in the northern Gulf of Mexico is investigated using meta-analysis for two salt marsh indicator invertebrates, the periwinkle snail (Littoraria irrorata) and amphipod crustaceans (Amphipoda). These invertebrates serve key marsh ecosystem functions including facilitating nutrient cycling and serving as prey for larger ecologically and economically important species. Recovery of periwinkles in restored marshes compared to reference sites is quantified by progression in population density and, because the species is long-lived (~ 10 years), in terms of biomass added per unit area each year following restoration. Amphipods are shorter-lived with high annual turnover; thus, recovery through time is estimated by the density of individuals rather than by biomass. The results of the analyses indicate progressive periwinkle recovery to equivalence with reference systems by year 4 in terms of density and year 6 with respect to annual biomass addition, while amphipod densities do not fully recover in the first 20 years following restoration. Although periwinkle recovery in terms of annual biomass addition reaches equivalence by year 6, the development of an age class structure characteristic of reference marshes would likely take longer because of the relatively long lifespan for this species. In addition to providing insight into the benefits of salt marsh restoration in the northern Gulf of Mexico, the approach described can be applied more generally to restoration scaling in a natural resource damage assessment context.

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 1804-1820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail F. Fricano ◽  
Matthew S. Baumann ◽  
Katie Fedeli ◽  
Claire E. Schlemme ◽  
Melissa Vernon Carle ◽  
...  

Abstract Extensive salt marsh restoration is expected in the northern Gulf of Mexico over the next several decades, funded in part by settlements from the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Understanding the ecological benefits of restored marshes over time is integral to setting appropriate restoration targets and performance criteria and in determining the restoration area needed to achieve desired restoration goals and offset quantified natural resource injuries. We present a method for quantifying anticipated ecological benefits associated with marsh restoration projects, particularly marsh creation or enhancement through the placement of dredged material, in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Using salt marsh vegetation (percent cover, aboveground biomass, and belowground biomass) and indicator faunal species (periwinkle snails and amphipods) as representative marsh community components, we used resource equivalency analysis (REA) to model projected ecological benefits over time and quantified total net project benefits for a hypothetical marsh creation project in Barataria Bay, Louisiana. Sensitivity analysis of the resulting model suggests that the recovery trajectories for each marsh component were the most important drivers of modeled restoration benefits and that model uncertainty was greatest for marsh fauna, which has limited data availability compared to marsh vegetation and high natural variability. Longer-term monitoring at restored restoration sites and/or targeted monitoring of older restoration projects would reduce variability in the recovery trajectories for the marsh community components examined in this case study and improve the reliability of the REA model for projecting benefits associated with salt marsh restoration.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1610-1620
Author(s):  
Paige A. Byerly ◽  
J. Hardin Waddle ◽  
Alexis Romero Premeaux ◽  
Paul L. Leberg

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 1680-1691
Author(s):  
Melissa Vernon Carle ◽  
Kristopher G. Benson ◽  
James F. Reinhardt

Abstract This collection of papers provides insights into methods and data currently available to quantify the benefits associated with estuarine habitat restoration projects in the northern Gulf of Mexico, USA, with potential applicability to other coastal systems. Extensive habitat restoration is expected to occur in the northern Gulf of Mexico region over the next several decades through funding associated with the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Papers in this section examine the development of vegetation, soil properties, invertebrate fauna, and nekton communities in restored coastal marshes and provide a conceptual framework for applying these findings to quantify the benefits associated with compensatory marsh restoration. Extensive meta-analysis of existing data for Gulf of Mexico coastal habitats further confirms that structured habitats such as marsh, submerged aquatic vegetation, and oyster reefs support greater nekton densities than nonvegetated bottom habitat, with oyster reefs supporting different species assemblages than marsh and submerged aquatic vegetation. Other papers demonstrate that while vegetation cover can establish rapidly within the first 5 years of restoration, belowground parameters such as root biomass and soil organic matter remain 44% to 92% lower at restored marshes than reference marshes 15 years after restoration. On average, amphipod and nekton densities are also not fully restored until at least 20 and 13 years following restoration, respectively. Additional papers present methods to estimate the benefits associated with marsh restoration projects, nekton productivity associated with coastal and estuarine habitats, and the benefits associated with the removal of derelict crab traps in Gulf of Mexico estuaries.


2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 1295-1300 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Reid Nelson ◽  
Deionta Sutton ◽  
Dennis R. DeVries

Author(s):  
Md Masum Billah ◽  
Md Khurshid Alam Bhuiyan ◽  
Mohammad Ahsanul Islam ◽  
Jewel Das ◽  
ATM Rafiqul Hoque

2012 ◽  
pp. 333-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis C. Golet ◽  
Dennis H. A. Myshrall ◽  
Lawrence R. Oliver ◽  
Peter W. C. Paton ◽  
Brian C. Tefft

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1911-1921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faming Wang ◽  
Kevin D. Kroeger ◽  
Meagan E. Gonneea ◽  
John W. Pohlman ◽  
Jianwu Tang

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. e0215767 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Thomas ◽  
James T. Morris ◽  
Cathleen Wigand ◽  
Stefan M. Sievert

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document