scholarly journals Modeling Coastal Marsh Restoration Benefits in the Northern Gulf of Mexico

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 1804-1820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail F. Fricano ◽  
Matthew S. Baumann ◽  
Katie Fedeli ◽  
Claire E. Schlemme ◽  
Melissa Vernon Carle ◽  
...  

Abstract Extensive salt marsh restoration is expected in the northern Gulf of Mexico over the next several decades, funded in part by settlements from the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Understanding the ecological benefits of restored marshes over time is integral to setting appropriate restoration targets and performance criteria and in determining the restoration area needed to achieve desired restoration goals and offset quantified natural resource injuries. We present a method for quantifying anticipated ecological benefits associated with marsh restoration projects, particularly marsh creation or enhancement through the placement of dredged material, in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Using salt marsh vegetation (percent cover, aboveground biomass, and belowground biomass) and indicator faunal species (periwinkle snails and amphipods) as representative marsh community components, we used resource equivalency analysis (REA) to model projected ecological benefits over time and quantified total net project benefits for a hypothetical marsh creation project in Barataria Bay, Louisiana. Sensitivity analysis of the resulting model suggests that the recovery trajectories for each marsh component were the most important drivers of modeled restoration benefits and that model uncertainty was greatest for marsh fauna, which has limited data availability compared to marsh vegetation and high natural variability. Longer-term monitoring at restored restoration sites and/or targeted monitoring of older restoration projects would reduce variability in the recovery trajectories for the marsh community components examined in this case study and improve the reliability of the REA model for projecting benefits associated with salt marsh restoration.

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 1711-1721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Baumann ◽  
Gail F. Fricano ◽  
Katie Fedeli ◽  
Claire E. Schlemme ◽  
Mary C. Christman ◽  
...  

Abstract Recovery following salt marsh restoration in the northern Gulf of Mexico is investigated using meta-analysis for two salt marsh indicator invertebrates, the periwinkle snail (Littoraria irrorata) and amphipod crustaceans (Amphipoda). These invertebrates serve key marsh ecosystem functions including facilitating nutrient cycling and serving as prey for larger ecologically and economically important species. Recovery of periwinkles in restored marshes compared to reference sites is quantified by progression in population density and, because the species is long-lived (~ 10 years), in terms of biomass added per unit area each year following restoration. Amphipods are shorter-lived with high annual turnover; thus, recovery through time is estimated by the density of individuals rather than by biomass. The results of the analyses indicate progressive periwinkle recovery to equivalence with reference systems by year 4 in terms of density and year 6 with respect to annual biomass addition, while amphipod densities do not fully recover in the first 20 years following restoration. Although periwinkle recovery in terms of annual biomass addition reaches equivalence by year 6, the development of an age class structure characteristic of reference marshes would likely take longer because of the relatively long lifespan for this species. In addition to providing insight into the benefits of salt marsh restoration in the northern Gulf of Mexico, the approach described can be applied more generally to restoration scaling in a natural resource damage assessment context.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1610-1620
Author(s):  
Paige A. Byerly ◽  
J. Hardin Waddle ◽  
Alexis Romero Premeaux ◽  
Paul L. Leberg

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 1295-1300 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Reid Nelson ◽  
Deionta Sutton ◽  
Dennis R. DeVries

Author(s):  
Md Masum Billah ◽  
Md Khurshid Alam Bhuiyan ◽  
Mohammad Ahsanul Islam ◽  
Jewel Das ◽  
ATM Rafiqul Hoque

2012 ◽  
pp. 333-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis C. Golet ◽  
Dennis H. A. Myshrall ◽  
Lawrence R. Oliver ◽  
Peter W. C. Paton ◽  
Brian C. Tefft

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1911-1921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faming Wang ◽  
Kevin D. Kroeger ◽  
Meagan E. Gonneea ◽  
John W. Pohlman ◽  
Jianwu Tang

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. e0215767 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Thomas ◽  
James T. Morris ◽  
Cathleen Wigand ◽  
Stefan M. Sievert

2017 ◽  
Vol 106 ◽  
pp. 174-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerd Masselink ◽  
Mick E. Hanley ◽  
Anissa C. Halwyn ◽  
Will Blake ◽  
Ken Kingston ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document