Expression of the Serrated Markers Annexin A10 or Gremlin1 in Colonic Adenocarcinomas: Morphology and Prognostic Values

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 2509-2521
Author(s):  
Benjamin Marquet ◽  
Aude Marchal Bressenot ◽  
Caroline Fichel ◽  
Nicole Bouland ◽  
Coralie Barbe ◽  
...  
1979 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 157-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel B. Labow ◽  
Barton Hoexter ◽  
David C. Walrath

Digestion ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 18 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 261-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Markert ◽  
L.W. Rogers ◽  
Jen-Fu Chiu

2009 ◽  
Vol 133 (8) ◽  
pp. 1317-1331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aliya N. Husain ◽  
Thomas V. Colby ◽  
Nelson G. Ordóñez ◽  
Thomas Krausz ◽  
Alain Borczuk ◽  
...  

Abstract Context.—Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is an uncommon tumor that can be difficult to diagnose. Objective.—To develop practical guidelines for the pathologic diagnosis of MM. Data Sources.—A pathology panel was convened at the International Mesothelioma Interest Group biennial meeting (October 2006). Pathologists with an interest in the field also contributed after the meeting. Conclusions.—There was consensus opinion regarding (1) distinguishing benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations (both epithelioid and spindle cell lesions), (2) cytologic diagnosis of MM, (3) key histologic features of pleural and peritoneal MM, (4) use of histochemical and immunohistochemical stains in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of MM, (5) differentiating epithelioid MM from various carcinomas (lung, breast, ovarian, and colonic adenocarcinomas and squamous cell and renal cell carcinomas), (6) diagnosis of sarcomatoid mesothelioma, (7) use of molecular markers in the differential diagnosis of MM, (8) electron microscopy in the diagnosis of MM, and (9) some caveats and pitfalls in the diagnosis of MM. Immunohistochemical panels are integral to the diagnosis of MM, but the exact makeup of panels used is dependent on the differential diagnosis and on the antibodies available in a given laboratory. Immunohistochemical panels should contain both positive and negative markers. The International Mesothelioma Interest Group recommends that markers have either sensitivity or specificity greater than 80% for the lesions in question. Interpretation of positivity generally should take into account the localization of the stain (eg, nuclear versus cytoplasmic) and the percentage of cells staining (>10% is suggested for cytoplasmic membranous markers). These guidelines are meant to be a practical reference for the pathologist.


1975 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Gasic ◽  
T. Gasic ◽  
B. Hsu ◽  
P. Koch ◽  
S. Niewiarowski

Previous investigations demonstrated that mouse tumors cause platelet aggregation (PA) and increase platelet turnover. Depletion of platelets by neuraminidase and inhibition of PA by aspirin reduced the munber of metastases (Gasic et al., Int. J. Cancer 11, 704, 1973). The purpose of this investigation was to study further interaction of cells from various mouse and human tumors with platelets. Cells of 7 mouse tumors (1 mammary adenocarcinomas, 5 sarcomas, I melanoma) and 14 human tumors (8 breast, 3 colonic adenocarcinomas, 1 cancer of the ureter, 1 Wilms tumor, and 1 neuroblastoma) aggregated homologous platelets suspended in heparinized plasma. Three mouse tumors (2 mammary and 1 sarcoma) and 5 human tumors (2 breast, 1 sarcoma, 1 Wilms, and 1 neuroblastoma) did not. PA was accompanied by the release of radio-activity from 14C-serotonin labeled platelets (range 15–90%). PA activity was not correlated with fibrinolytic or procoagulant activity. The contribution of plasminogen activators, thrombin, and tumor immune complexes has been excluded. However, gamma globulin of tumor bearing mice contained a “blocking factor” which delayed PA. Since enzymatic removal of ADP reduced PA it is possible that the ADP release either by tumors or by platelets played a contributory role. The pattern of PA by tumor cells rossembled that induced by collagen. Indeed preliminary evidence suggests that collagen-like material associated with tumor cells might be involved in platelet adherence to these cells and subsequent aggregation.(Supported by NIH Grants CA-15728, HL 14217. HL 15226, and by a Univ. of Penna.’s General Research Support Grant.)


1993 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmelo Urso ◽  
Maria Benedetta Ninu ◽  
Alessandro Franchi ◽  
Milena Paglierani ◽  
Roberto Bondi

Background Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) of the nose and paranasal sinuses is a relatively rare tumor. It commonly affects subjects exposed to wood or leather dust. Methods The authors present the clinicopathologic findings of 18 cases of sinonasal ITACs and review the proposed histologic classifications. Results All patients, except one, were males; mean age was 60 years (range, 41-79); in 9 cases an occupational exposure to wood or leather dust was found. Common presenting symptoms were epistaxis, nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea. Histologically, tumors were divided into four groups: well-differentiated (G1) ITACs = 3 cases; moderately differentiated (G2) ITACs = 8 cases; poorly differentiated (G3) ITACs = 2 cases; mucinous (M) ITACs = 5 cases. Immunocytochemically, 16/17 cases were positive for carcinoembryonal antigen, 1/17 for somatostatin, and 0/16 cases for gastrin. Conclusions Sinonasal ITACs are aggressive tumors, often diagnosed in a relatively advanced stage. Owing the close similarity of the microscopic aspects, a histologic classification of ITACs analogous to that of colonic adenocarcinomas is proposed.


2014 ◽  
Vol 466 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara A. Sajanti ◽  
Juha P. Väyrynen ◽  
Päivi Sirniö ◽  
Kai Klintrup ◽  
Jyrki Mäkelä ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document