scholarly journals Open Access Publishing: A Study of Current Practice in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Research

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 517-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arpan Tahim ◽  
Hitesh Bansal ◽  
Alexander M. C. Goodson ◽  
Karl F. B. Payne ◽  
Sanjeeve Sabharwal
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Current Practice ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Open Access Publishing ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Surgery Research

Reporting of ethical protection in recent oral and maxillofacial surgery research involving human subjects

2009 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 707-712 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Pitak-Arnnop ◽  
R. Sader ◽  
C. Hervé ◽  
K. Dhanuthai ◽  
J.-Ch. Bertrand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Human Subjects ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Surgery Research

scholarly journals Perspectives of stem cell use in reconstructive maxillofacial surgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 84-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail G. Semyonov ◽  
Yulia V. Stepanova ◽  
Darya О. Troshchieva
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Cell Biology ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Modern Medicine ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Important Trend ◽  
Surgery Research ◽  
Specialized Tissue ◽  
Clinical Problems ◽  
Review Current

The discovery of stem cells is one of the greatest achievements of molecular and cell biology, and associated research has confirmed the possibility of self-renewal and differentiation into specialized tissue stem cells. The use of cellular technologies is an important trend in modern medicine. The aim of this article is to briefly review current findings on the use of stem cells in cardiology, endocrinology, neurology, traumatology, and maxillofacial surgery. All data were retrieved from experimental and clinical studies using various cell technologies. The material is part of ongoing maxillofacial surgery research to investigate the possible use of stem cells in reconstructive maxillofacial surgery for jaw bone pathologies in children. Present tissue engineering methods provide some opportunities for solving difficult clinical problems in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Despite some international achievements of effective application of IC in various diseases, clinical use in reconstructive surgery requires further investigation.

scholarly journals Comparison of Article Processing Fees on Open Access Journals with a 4.5-Year History of Publishing

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 176-185
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Public Library ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Article Processing Charge ◽  
Open Access Publication ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Open Access Journals ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Article Processing Charges

Open access article (synonym: open access publication) is a type of peer-reviewed article which gives a possibility to the readers to read and download it free of charge owing to paying an open access publication fee (OAPF) directly by its authors, their institutions, or funders.1 According to Solomon and Björk`s study, who analyzed about 1,370 journals, article processing charges range from 8 to 3,900 US Dollars.1, 2 Moreover, the official Elsevier`s page dedicated to the list of all company`s open access journals indicated that an article processing charge can reach 6,000 US Dollars excluding tax.3 First publishing houses that supported and develop open access journals have been two new academic publishers – BioMed Central (BMC) and Public Library of Science (PLoS).1 In 2000, they began establishing journals that rely on open access publication fee.1 Most motivation criteria for the authors from the fields of oral and maxillofacial surgery, periodontics in choosing to what peer-reviewed journal submit their paper may be classified under three chief groups: 1) indexing and abstracting in different recognized data bases (PubMed/Medline,4 Scopus, Web of Science, etc.), 2) an impact metric,5 and 3) an amount of the article processing charge. First two motivation criteria are precisely described in recent publications but the last one – open access publication fee and its amount – should be investigated more scrupulously.4, 5 There is a great need to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of OAPF both for authors and editorial staff/publishers. This is the aim of this study in order to understand the advantages and disadvantages the payment methods. For the purpose of comparative analysis we selected two peer-reviewed journals according to the following inclusion criteria: 1. Fully open access publication (hybrid or delayed open access journals were excluded during selection). 2. Similar term of publication history – about 5 years (similar starting point allows comparing the peer-reviewed journals more precisely). 3. Journals focused on oral surgery. 4. Different ways of receiving article processing charges after the submission of manuscripts. 5. English, as language of publications. Analysis was performed on the publishing statistics, abstracting and indexation of the journals as important characteristics of the ways of growth of both peer-reviewed publications.

ATTITUDE TO OPEN ACCESS IN RUSSIAN SCHOLARLY COMMUNITY: 2018. SURVEY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. K. Razumova ◽  
N. N. Litvinova ◽  
M. E. Shvartsman ◽  
A. Yu. Kuznetsov
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Open Access Publishing ◽  
Scholarly Community ◽  
Research Areas ◽  
Survey Results ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Policies And Programs ◽  
The Uk ◽  
High Level ◽  
Access Policies

Introduction. The paper presents survey results on the awareness towards and practice of Open Access scholarly publishing among Russian academics.Materials and Methods. We employed methods of statistical analysis of survey results. Materials comprise results of data processing of Russian survey conducted in 2018 and published results of the latest international surveys. The survey comprised 1383 respondents from 182 organizations. We performed comparative studies of the responses from academics and research institutions as well as different research areas. The study compares results obtained in Russia with the recently published results of surveys conducted in the United Kingdom and Europe.Results. Our findings show that 95% of Russian respondents support open access, 94% agree to post their publications in open repositories and 75% have experience in open access publishing. We did not find any difference in the awareness and attitude towards open access among seven reference groups. Our analysis revealed the difference in the structure of open access publications of the authors from universities and research institutes. Discussion andConclusions. Results reveal a high level of awareness and support to open access and succeful practice in the open access publications in the Russian scholarly community. The results for Russia demonstrate close similarity with the results of the UK academics. The governmental open access policies and programs would foster the practical realization of the open access in Russia.

Dental students’ perceptions of oral and maxillofacial surgery as a specialty

2019 ◽  
pp. 266-271
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Almutairi ◽  
Abdullah AlQarni ◽  
Mohammad Alharbi ◽  
Ahmed Almutairi ◽  
Mohammed Aldohan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Dental Students ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document