Relationship between oil recovery and CO2 storage efficiency under the influence of gravity segregation in a CO2 EOR system

2015 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinju Han ◽  
Hyemin Park ◽  
Wonmo Sung
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Ward ◽  
Wolfgang Heidug

Storing carbon dioxide (CO2 ) in oil reservoirs as part of CO2 -based enhanced oil recovery (CO2 -EOR) can be a cost-effective solution to reduce emissions into the atmosphere. In this paper, we analyze the economics of this option in order to estimate the amount of CO2 that could be profitably stored in different regions of the world. We consider situations in which the CO2 -EOR operator either purchases the CO2 supplied or is paid for its storage. Building upon extensive data sets concerning the characteristics and location of oil reservoirs and emission sources, the paper focuses on opportunities outside North America. Using net present value (NPV) as an indicator for profitability, we conduct a break-even analysis to relate CO2 supply prices (positive or negative) to economically viable storage potential.


2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (06) ◽  
pp. 67-68
Author(s):  
Chris Carpenter

This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper SPE 200316, “Joint Optimization of Well Completions and Controls for CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery and Storage,” by Bailian Chen, SPE, and Rajesh Pawar, Los Alamos National Laboratory, prepared for the 2020 SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, originally scheduled to be held in Tulsa 18–22 April. The paper has not been peer reviewed. Carbon dioxide (CO2) storage through CO2 enhanced oil recovery (EOR) has been considered an option for larger-scale deployment of CO2 storage because of the economic benefits of oil recovery, 45Q tax credits, and the use of existing infrastructure. The complete paper investigates how optimal reservoir management and operation strategies can be used to optimize both CO2 storage and oil recovery. Results of the authors’ study showed that joint optimization of well completions and well controls can achieve a higher final net present value (NPV) than that obtained from the optimization of well controls only. Introduction In CO2 EOR associated with storage processes, poorly designed well-operating conditions or completions can lead to low oil recovery factors and suboptimal CO2 storage. Co-optimization of oil production and CO2 storage has been recognized as a feasible technique to maximize benefit in terms of oil production and CO2 storage tax credit. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, settings for well completions have not been considered as optimization variables in a CO2 EOR and storage co-optimization process. The objective of this study is to conduct joint optimization of well completions and controls [well rates or bottomhole pressures (BHP)] that maximize life-cycle NPV in CO2 EOR and storage processes and demonstrate the superiority of joint optimization over well-control-only optimization. Optimization Problem In this study, the optimization problem considered is the joint optimization of well completions and well controls for a CO2 EOR and storage process. The mathematical process behind this determination is detailed in the complete paper. The optimization problem was focused on jointly estimating the well completions (i.e., fraction of injection/production well perforations in each reservoir layer) and CO2 injection and oil-production controls that maximize NPV in a CO2 EOR and storage operation. The authors used a newly developed stochastic simplex approximate gradient algorithm to solve the optimization problem. The performance of the joint optimization approach was compared with the performance of the well-control-only optimization approach. In addition, the performance of the co-optimization of CO2 storage and oil-recovery approach was compared with that of the maximization of only-CO2-storage and only-oil-recovery approaches.


2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (06) ◽  
pp. 63-64
Author(s):  
Judy Feder

This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Judy Feder, contains highlights of paper SPE 200560, “CO2-EOR and Storage Potentials in Depleted Reservoirs in the Norwegian Continental Shelf,” by Elhans Imanovs, SPE, and Samuel Krevor, SPE, Imperial College London, and Ali Mojaddam Zadeh, Equinor, prepared for the 2020 SPE Europec featured at the 82nd EAGE Conference and Exhibition, originally scheduled to be held in Amsterdam, 8–11 June. The paper has not been peer reviewed. A combination of carbon dioxide (CO2) enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and storage schemes could offer an opportunity to produce additional oil from depleted reservoirs and permanently store CO2 in the subsurface in an economically efficient manner. The complete paper evaluates the effect of different injection methods on oil recovery and CO2 storage potential in a depleted sandstone reservoir in the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS). The methods include continuous gas injection (CGI), continuous water injection (CWI), water alternating gas (WAG), tapered WAG (TWAG), simultaneous water above gas coinjection (SWGCO), simultaneous water and gas injection (SWGI), and cyclic SWGI. CO2 EOR and Storage in the NCS In recent years, the number of newly explored fields in the NCS has decreased. Approximately 47% of total resources in the NCS have been produced, and approximately 20% of resources are estimated as recoverable reserves. To fill in the gap between energy demand and recoverable reserves, EOR methods could be employed. One of the most efficient EOR methods is CO2 injection, because complete microscopic sweep efficiency can be achieved, leading to a total depletion of the reservoir. The three major types of CO2 EOR processes—miscible, near-miscible, and immiscible—are described and discussed in the full paper. Four primary CO2-trapping mechanisms are used in the subsurface: structural/stratigraphic, solubility, residual, and mineral trapping. The main locations for underground geological storage are depleted oil and gas reservoirs, coal formations, and saline aquifers. Currently, underground CO2 storage is believed to be a major technology to dramatically reduce CO2 amounts in the atmosphere. According to the International Energy Agency, 54 major oil basins around the world have the potential to produce 75 Bsm3 of additional oil and store 140 Gt of CO2. CO2 EOR and storage projects in the NCS could have several benefits. First, surface and subsea facility availability in the NCS region reduces capital expenditures. Second, in addition to the revenue from extra oil production, carbon credits could be awarded for the CO2 storage. The main challenges of CO2 EOR and storage offshore projects are high operational and capital expenditures. In depleted reservoirs, these include modification of offshore platform materials; additional power supply for CO2 compression and recycling; and replacement of the tubing because wet CO2 is highly corrosive, resulting in scale, asphaltene, and hydrates formation. Contamination of a gas cap with injected CO2 might lead to loss of hydrocarbon gas market value. Only one CO2 EOR project has been implemented offshore—the Lula field in Brazil’s Santos Basin—meaning that industry has very limited experience in such projects.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Wang ◽  
Chengyuan Lv ◽  
Xuan Liu ◽  
Yongqiang Tang ◽  
Maolei Cui ◽  
...  

Abstract CO2 storage mechanisms in an EOR process in mature reservoirs are measured to determine three types of storage factors, which are introduced into compositional numerical simulation. The hybrid objective function coupli ng the oil recovery factor and the CO2 storage ratio is proposed to optimize the injection and production parameters in CO2 flooding. Three storage factors of the oil and water partition coefficient, the permeability change coefficient and the CO2 retention factor are measured in a laboratory, which is utilized to modify the grid properties of oil, brine, rock in compositional numerical simulation. The restart procedure is automatically adopted to consider these storage mechanisms in CO2 EOR. The bi-objective function of the oil recovery factor and the CO2 storage ratio is used to optimize the injection and production parameters for CO2 EOR, which concludes the design principles on CO2 EOR and storage. The oil and water partition coefficient defined as the ratio of the CO2 solubility in the oil phase and the brine phase is a constant for a specific reservoir condition. The permeability change coefficient caused by the mineral dissolution effect of carbonate water decreases slightly in the early stage and increases gradually with the long term injection. The CO2 retention factor that is induced by the relative permeability hysteresis decreases with the pressure and the permeability. These equivalent treated methods that modify fluids and rock in the real-time are inserted into the procedure of compositional numerical simulation to take into account the storage mechanisms in CO2 EOR. The results show that the effect of the storage mechanisms on EOR is evident. Furthermore, the bi - objective optimization indicates that the injection rate should be reduced largely in the medium and the later stages to control gas channeling as the EOR scenario is focused. And the bottom wellhole pressure of producers should be decreased to the lower level to maximize oil recovery. As the storage scenario is concentrated, the injection rate is required to be slightly controlled. As the producers are shut off, the injection rate must be increased significantly to maximize CO2 storage. The storage mechanisms in the CO2 EOR process have not been understood thoroughly. The methodology of numerical simulation coupling CO2 EOR and storage is not mature, which is still not taken into account in commercial software. The results above provide a way to optimize CO2 EOR and storage simultaneously, which is significant for the large scale storage after CO2 EOR in mature oilfield.


2018 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. 41-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley D. Peck ◽  
Nicholas A. Azzolina ◽  
Jun Ge ◽  
Nicholas W. Bosshart ◽  
Matthew E. Burton-Kelly ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document