scholarly journals Correction to: Treatment decision‑making in sickle cell disease patients

Author(s):  
A. Booth ◽  
V. Bonham ◽  
M. Porteus ◽  
K. E. Ormond
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Ginny L. Schulz

[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a treatment option utilized to cure many childhood disorders, with cancer, sickle cell disease (SCD), and aplastic anemia being a few. The decision of whether or not to pursue HCT involves uncertainty and risk. Pediatric patients with SCD and their families undergo a decision-making process distinct from patients with childhood cancer. Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) realize an awareness of unpredictable disease progression and conflict when considering HCT, while patients with cancer perceive an urgency for survival. We applied Connor's Framework of Decisional Conflict and a multiple-case study approach to describe the level and source of decisional conflict in patients with SCD and their families in a real-life decision choice of HCT. The contribution of the pediatric patient in the decision was also described in our four families. Observation, survey, and interview methods allowed us to gain an in-depth understanding of their conflict. Through pattern-matching and cross-case synthesis, we found that the level and sources of conflict among 11 participants varied within and across family members. Some experienced levels that resulted in a delayed decision or feeling unsure. The patients and their family members ultimately navigated their uncertainties together to come to consensus on whether to proceed with HCT. Future studies should implement individualized interventions from a family research perspective to decrease the decisional conflict this population faces.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (25) ◽  
pp. 2249-2260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth O. Stenger ◽  
Shalini Shenoy ◽  
Lakshmanan Krishnamurti

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can be curative for sickle cell disease, but decision-making is often complex. This How I Treat provides a perspective on how to negotiate this process for an individual patient.


2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 415-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chavis A. Patterson ◽  
Veronica Chavez ◽  
Valerie Mondestin ◽  
Janet Deatrick ◽  
Yimei Li ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 168-168
Author(s):  
Olabunmi A. Agboola ◽  
Pareen J. Shenoy ◽  
Paula J. Edwards ◽  
James R. Eckman ◽  
Christopher R. Flowers

Abstract Background: ASCT is currently the only curative option of cure for patients (pts) with sickle-cell disease. Assessing the risk and benefits of ASCT in pts with SCD is challenging due to variability in the morbidity and mortality of the disease and ASCT for individual pts. The impact of transplantation on quality of life, patient understanding of ASCT, and physician factors, all influence treatment selection. Individuals’ decision-making styles can influence how patients evaluate complex treatment decisions and thus how they view ASCT. Methods: To examine how patients with SCD make treatment decisions we performed a pilot study in which we administered an 80-item questionnaire to assess pts’: Desired Role in decision making, Need for Cognition, Need for Structure, Personal Fear of Invalidity, and General Decision Making style. During the visit, the research team and pt discussed the risks and benefits of ASCT and how they view their current treatment. Then, a 38-item post-visit questionnaire was administered to assess patients’ strength of preference for ASCT, perceptions of physician and caregiver’s preferences, and decision satisfaction. Questions were derived from previously validated questionnaires and used 5-point or 6-point Likert scale. Results: Questionnaires were administered to 25 pts (6 Sickle-Hemoglobin C (SC), 18 sickle cell anemia (SS), and 1 Sickle Beta-Thalassemia) undergoing evaluation of sickle cell disease. Patients were 18–71 years of age with 36% of pts being male. On an average, pts had experienced 4–7 episodes of sickle-cell crisis (min 0–3, max 16+). 20% of pts rated their current health as excellent/very good, 44% good, and 36% fair/poor. All pts completed all pre-visit and post-visit questions. Most pts expressed a desire that doctors make treatment decisions alone (68% agree/strongly agree) or with pt input (64%). An equally high number of pts (64%) believed they should make treatment decisions alone or with a doctor’s input. 64% of pts had high scores for rational decision making style, whereas 40% scored high for an intuitive style, 24% scored high for dependent style, and only 4% high for an avoidant style of decision making (Distribution shown in table). 72% of pts felt satisfied with the information they received for decision making and 88% were satisfied with their decision. However, 44% of pts wanted clearer advice. Conclusions: Examining pts decision making styles during the process of care is feasible and can uncover pt characteristics that are relevant for improving treatment discussions. Pts in this sample tended to use rational decision making styles but wanted clearer advice. Additional studies are needed examine these factors in larger populations of pts with sickle cell disease, understand their associations with demographic variables, and design and test decision support systems that help pts and hematologists with treatment selection. General Decision Making Style (GDMS) Values Rational Intuitive Dependent Avoidant Spontaneous Need for Structure Need for Cognition Median 20 19 17 12 12 44 52 Min 8 10 10 6 7 28 18 Max 25 25 25 21 19 58 63 Possible Range 5–25 5–25 5–25 5–25 5–25 11–66 18–90


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1891-1891
Author(s):  
Anna M Hood ◽  
Aimee K Hildenbrand ◽  
Joanna Rebitski ◽  
Jasmine Stallworth ◽  
Yolanda Johnson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Hydroxyurea (HU) is the primary medication used to prevent the significant medical and neurologic morbidities of pediatric sickle cell disease (SCD; HbSS or HbSB0 thalassemia). Despite the benefits of HU, it remains under-utilized likely due to lack of clinician knowledge/training and negative caregiver perceptions. Thus, we developed the Engage-HU randomized controlled trial (NCT03442114) as a novel approach to address HU utilization barriers. Engage-HU is designed to assess how clinicians can engage caregivers in a shared discussion that considers their values, preferences, and scientific evidence about HU. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant changes to healthcare delivery for children with SCD, as they are at increased risk of severe illness from COVID-19 infection. Given their risk status, it was recommended that patients with SCD complete telehealth visits when possible. Some families also chose to delay care because they feared their child would get infected at hospitals/healthcare clinics that care for COVID-19 positive patients. Since the lives of all families enrolled in the Engage-HU trial have been affected to some extent, we incorporated measures to capture the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the usability of telemedicine implementation and services. Methods: Engage-HU is a randomized control trial comparing two dissemination methods for clinicians to facilitate shared decision-making with caregivers of young children with SCD. Study outcomes include caregiver confidence in decision-making and perceptions of experiencing shared decision-making as well as HU uptake and child health outcomes. Eligible children are 0 to 5 years, candidates for HU, and their caregiver has not decided about HU in the past 3 months. The trial is being conducted at 9 sites in the United States and uses a unidirectional crossover design. The primary endpoints are caregiver decisional uncertainty and caregiver perception of shared decision-making measured using validated tools. Data will be analyzed using the intent-to-treat principle, and all participants will remain in the arm to which they were randomized. A multiple group comparison analysis will be performed to assess significant response variable differences by group randomization. The Engage-HU study aims to recruit 174 caregivers who are considering initiating HU. The trial is being conducted at 9 sites in the United States. Data collection is ongoing, and 160 caregiver-participants have been enrolled to date. Since May 2020, caregiver-participants have completed the COVID-19 Exposure and Family Impact Scales (CEFIS), which contain 2 subscales (exposure to potentially traumatic aspects of the pandemic, impact on families), and the COVID-19 telemedicine use survey during a study visit. Results: Currently, 8 of the 9 sites have collected data from 48 caregivers (93.8% mothers), most of whom (93.8%) identify as African American/Black (see Figure 1). Correlations indicated that older caregivers experienced greater exposure (Mean = 7.0, SD = 4.1, range = 1-19) to potentially traumatic aspects of the pandemic (r = .31, p = .04). Distress related to COVID-19 varied widely across the sample, for both caregivers (Mean = 5.9, SD = 2.9, range = 1-10) and children (Mean = 4.1, SD = 3.4, range = 1-10). Scores on the telemedicine usability survey were generally high, indicating that caregivers are happy with the quality of care delivered via telehealth. However, caregivers (r = .30, p = .09) and children (r = .32, p = .07) experiencing more pandemic-related distress reported less satisfaction with telehealth. Conclusion: Although Engage-HU has resumed research operations, recruitment has not reached pre-pandemic targets, as fewer eligible patients are scheduled for routine care visits at SCD clinics. Our preliminary analyses suggest a significant continued impact of the pandemic on families and general satisfaction with the quality of healthcare delivered via telemedicine. These findings indicate that targeted screenings to identify and intervene for those who demonstrate more COVID-19 pandemic-related distress are needed. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Quinn: Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; Aruvant: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Emmaus Medical: Research Funding. Yates: Agios Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Badawy: Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy; Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio Inc: Consultancy. Thompson: bluebird bio, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Baxalta: Research Funding; Biomarin: Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR Therapeutics: Research Funding; Vertex: Research Funding; Editas: Research Funding; Graphite Bio: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy; Beam: Consultancy; Global Blood Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Smith-Whitley: Global Blood Therapeutics: Current Employment. King: National Cancer Institute: Research Funding; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute: Research Funding; Health Resources and Services Administration: Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Research Funding. Meier: CVS Caremark: Consultancy; Forma Therapeutic: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NovoNordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis,: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board membership; NHLBI: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board membership; Global Blood Therapeutics: Other: Steering Committee membership, grant funding; CDC,: Other: grant funding; Indiana Department of Health: Other: grant funding . Tubman: Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Forma Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Perkin Elmer: Honoraria. Crosby: Forma Therapeutics: Honoraria; PCORI: Research Funding; HRSA: Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics Panel: Honoraria; Children's Hospital of Philadelphia: Honoraria; Professional Resource Exchange: Patents & Royalties: $30-$60 every other year; SCDAA: Honoraria; NHLBI: Other: Payment for review of LRP Proposals, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Hydroxyurea has been FDA approved for the treatment of sickle cell disease for patients ages 2 years and above but NHLBI and ASH Guidelines recommend it be offered to children as young as age 9 months.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Maureen Varty ◽  
Barbara Speller-Brown ◽  
Bonnie J. Wakefield ◽  
Russell D. Ravert ◽  
Katherine Patterson Kelly ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. e206742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitya Bakshi ◽  
Deeksha Katoch ◽  
Cynthia B. Sinha ◽  
Diana Ross ◽  
Maa-Ohui Quarmyne ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Maureen M. Varty

Transition from pediatric to adult healthcare settings poses significant risks to morbidity and mortality for adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease. Increasing transition readiness, the acquisition of disease-specific knowledge and self-management skills, has been proposed as strategy to improve health outcomes for adolescents and young adults (AYA) after transition. To date, few studies have looked at factors that may influence transition readiness, a measure of disease-specific knowledge and self-management, in AYAs with sickle cell disease. This limits healthcare providers' and researchers' abilities to develop interventions specific to the unique needs of the population. This dissertation study examined the relationships between decision-making involvement, self-efficacy of sickle cell disease self-management, and transition readiness in AYAs with sickle cell disease prior to transition to adult healthcare settings. This study found that higher levels of expressive behaviors such as sharing opinions and ideas in decision-making were associated with higher levels of AYA healthcare responsibility. Self-efficacy was positively associated with transition readiness but inversely related to AYA healthcare responsibility. Parent involvement was negatively associated with AYA healthcare responsibility. Future research interventions that increase AYA involvement in decision-making regarding disease management, increase self-efficacy, and safely reduce parent involvement may positively influence their capacity for self-management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document