Intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer with pull through delayed anastomosis. An alternative to coloanal anastomosis with covering ileostomy

2016 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 417-421
Author(s):  
Ioannis Bolanis ◽  
S. Bassioukas ◽  
D. Psilopoulos ◽  
D. Gialvalis ◽  
G. Filippou ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 495-502
Author(s):  
Francesco Bianco ◽  
Paola Incollingo ◽  
Armando Falato ◽  
Silvia De Franciscis ◽  
Andrea Belli ◽  
...  

AbstractDespite advances in coloanal anastomosis techniques, satisfactory procedures completed without complications remain lacking. We investigated the effectiveness of our recently developed ‘Short stump and High anastomosis Pull-through’ (SHiP) procedure for delayed coloanal anastomosis without a stoma. In this retrospective study, we analysed functional outcomes, morbidity, and mortality rates and local recurrence of 37 patients treated using SHiP procedure, out of the 282 patients affected by rectal cancer treated in our institution between 2012 and 2020. The inclusion criterion was that the rectal cancer be located within 4 cm from the anal margin. One patient died of local and pulmonary recurrence after 6 years, one developed lung and liver metastases after 2 years, and one experienced local recurrence 2.5 years after surgery. No major leak, retraction, or ischaemia of the colonic stump occurred; the perioperative mortality rate was zero. Five patients (13.51%) had early complications. Stenosis of the anastomosis, which occurred in nine patients (24.3%), was the only long-term complication; only three (8.1%) were symptomatic and were treated with endoscopic dilation. The mean Wexner scores at 24 and 36 months were 8.3 and 8.1 points, respectively. At the 36-month check-up, six patients (24%) had major LARS, ten (40%) had minor LARS, and nine (36%) had no LARS. The functional results in terms of LARS were similar to those previously reported after immediate coloanal anastomosis with protective stoma. The SHiP procedure resulted in a drastic reduction in major complications, and none of the patients had a stoma.


2022 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. e246356
Author(s):  
Joanna Pauline A Baltazar ◽  
Marc Paul J Lopez ◽  
Mark Augustine S Onglao

A 61-year-old woman developed neorectal prolapse after laparoscopic low anterior resection, total mesorectal excision with partial intersphincteric resection and handsewn coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. She presented with a 3 cm full thickness reducible prolapse, with associated anal pain and bleeding. A perineal stapled prolapse resection was performed to address the rectal prolapse, with satisfactory results.


2009 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 950-957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Gang Han ◽  
Guang Hui Wei ◽  
Zhi Gang Gao ◽  
Yi Zheng ◽  
Zhen Jun Wang

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 248-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshikatsu Nitta ◽  
Keitaro Tanaka ◽  
Jun Kataoka ◽  
Masato Ohta ◽  
Masatsugu Ishii ◽  
...  

A 58-year-old Japanese man, with a body mass index of 41.7 kg/m2 (height: 179.8 cm; weight: 133.8 kg), underwent a laparoscopic pull-through procedure with delayed coloanal anastomosis performed in two surgical stages for lower rectal cancer. This method was selected because the volume of the abdominal wall was fairly thick and it would have been impossible to perform diverting ileostomy and colostomy, which are routinely conducted. First, a colonic pull-through segment of about 10 cm was left outside the anal canal without any tension and was fixed by sutures under indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG FI). The second surgical stage was performed 10 days after the first operation under general anesthesia. Final coloanal anastomosis was performed with near-infrared light without diverting the stoma under ICG FI. The patient demonstrated a good postoperative course and was discharged from our hospital in remission 15 days after the latest operation. We could inspect the coloanal flow of the anastomosis under ICG FI before the reconstruction. This procedure was considered to be a standard method, but it was overtaken by new technology, ICG FI. This procedure is an ultimate stomaless surgery for ultralow rectal cancer that can be performed in selected cases, such as in patients with a high body mass index and with hope for stomaless operation.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gokhan Cipe ◽  
Mahmut Muslumanoglu ◽  
Erkan Yardimci ◽  
Naim Memmi ◽  
Erhan Aysan

In the treatment of distal rectal cancer, abdominoperineal resection is traditionally performed. However, the recognition of shorter safe distal resection line, intersphincteric resection technique has given a chance of sphincter-saving surgery for patients with distal rectal cancer during last two decades and still is being performed as an alternative choice of abdominoperineal resection. The first aim of this study is to assess the morbidity, mortality, oncological, and functional outcomes of intersphincteric resection. The second aim is to compare outcomes of patients who underwent intersphincteric resection with the outcomes of patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection.


2004 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 832-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric Bretagnol ◽  
Eric Rullier ◽  
Christophe Laurent ◽  
Frank Zerbib ◽  
Renaud Gontier ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document