Internal Drainage of Infected Pancreatic Necrosis: A Fail-Safe Alternative to Percutaneous Catheter Drainage

2019 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-79
Author(s):  
D. Routh ◽  
C. S. Naidu
Pancreas ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 302-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhihui Tong ◽  
Weiqin Li ◽  
Wenkui Yu ◽  
Yanxia Geng ◽  
Lu Ke ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
A. V. Shabunin ◽  
A. Yu. Lukin ◽  
D. V. Shikov ◽  
A. A. Kolotilshchikov

Aim. To clarify the indications for video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement at the late stage of pancreatic necrosis. Material and methods. Acute pancreatitis was diagnosed in 1468 patients throughout 2012-2018. Severe destructive pancreatic necrosis occurred in 364 (24.8%) patients. Infected pancreatic necrosis needed for surgical treatment in 264 cases. We used video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement in 20 patients (8.1%).Results. Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement was not associated with “open” surgery in 6 patients. There were 2-6 redo VARD procedures per patient. We diagnosed the “left-sided” and “right-sided” models of pancreas and peripancreatic space infiltrationin 4 and 2 patients, respectively. There were 14 patients who needed an “open” surgery besides video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement due to advanced inflammation. Bleeding was the only complication and occurred in 2 patients. There was 1 unfavorable outcome.Conclusion. Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement is an effective minimally invasive approach of debridement. Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement combined with percutaneous catheter drainage is preferable for “leftsided” and “right-sided” infiltration of pancreas and peripancreatic tissue. It is advisable to combine video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement with open surgery for “mixed model” of infiltration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document