scholarly journals Cardio-metabolic risk prediction should be superior to cardiovascular risk assessment in primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hana Rosolova ◽  
Barbora Nussbaumerova
PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e0147417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parinya Chamnan ◽  
Rebecca K. Simmons ◽  
Stephen J. Sharp ◽  
Kay-Tee Khaw ◽  
Nicholas J. Wareham ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-35
Author(s):  
Dinu Valentin Balanescu ◽  
◽  
Cristina Ileana Iosif ◽  
Andra Rodica Balanescu ◽  
Ruxandra Ionescu ◽  
...  

AIDS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 997-999
Author(s):  
Tapiwa Kumwenda ◽  
Shameem Buleya ◽  
Beatrice Matanje ◽  
Tom Heller ◽  
Sam Phiri ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren G Gilstrap ◽  
Thomas J Wang

Abstract BACKGROUND Interest in cardiovascular biomarkers in primary prevention has increased dramatically in the past decade. This increase has been fueled by an improved understanding of cardiovascular pathophysiology, as well as novel technologies for biomarker identification. CONTENT In this review we provide a brief overview of recent concepts in the evaluation of screening biomarkers, because biomarkers may behave differently when used for screening as opposed to diagnosis or disease staging. The following specific biomarker examples are then discussed, with a focus on data from primary prevention studies: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, B-type natriuretic peptide, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, and high-sensitivity troponin T. The article concludes by addressing novel platforms for biomarker discovery, reviewing recent examples from the field of metabolomics. SUMMARY An ongoing challenge is to develop screening strategies that can identify individuals at risk for cardiovascular events well before symptoms appear. For this purpose, the measurement of soluble biomarkers could be an important adjunct to traditional cardiovascular risk assessment. Recent studies highlight both the strengths and limitations of “novel” circulating biomarkers, and suggest that substantial work is still needed to identify biomarkers that are sufficiently accurate and cost-effective for routine use in primary prevention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document