scholarly journals Effectiveness of a Patient Education Class to Enhance Knowledge about Lung Cancer Screening: a Quality Improvement Evaluation

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 897-904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori C. Sakoda ◽  
◽  
Melanie A. Meyer ◽  
Neetu Chawla ◽  
Michael A. Sanchez ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 164-164
Author(s):  
Laura Lee Hall ◽  
Joseph Weigel ◽  
Grace Libby Campbell ◽  
Will Miller ◽  
J'Aimee Louis ◽  
...  

164 Background: Kentucky is the epicenter of smoking and lung cancer in the U.S.: over half the population is a current or former smoker (second only to WV); and it has the highest annual lung cancer incidence—89.6 per 100,000 population—according to the most recent CDC data. While offering a significant, double-digit death benefit due to early recognition and improved therapies, LDCT lung cancer screening of at-risk individuals remains extremely low. Helping primary care practices identify their at-risk patients, promote reduced tobacco use, and refer for screening is critical. Methods: In this pilot, family practice and internal medicine practices, residency programs, and federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) were recruited in rural regions of Eastern Kentucky with populations at highest risk. The Sustainable Healthy Communities Quality Improvement Education (SHC-QIE) model—which engages multidisciplinary practice leaders, rapid cycle improvement or a PDSA approach to QI, geoanalytics, and community engagement support—was implemented to promote better screening while enhancing clinician satisfaction. Results: Each practice significantly improved their identification of smokers and patients qualifying for lung cancer screening in the Medicare program as well as screening referrals by nearly 2-fold. For example, in one FQHC, accurate reporting of tobacco history data in the medical record increased from 34.6% to 56.9%. Another example showed referrals for LDCTs increased from 230 in 2017 to 412 in 2018, with a 71% increase over baseline. While survey data from the participating clinics conceded challenges in implementing a QI initiative, significant satisfaction with the initiative, ongoing plans for activities building on the program, and community engagement were found as well. Pre-, post-survey data also revealed significant improvement in screening, tobacco counseling, and LDCT referral. Conclusions: In spite of EMR barriers, significant increases in smoking history taking, counseling for tobacco cessation, and referral for lung cancer screening was achieved over the course of 9 months.


2018 ◽  
Vol 211 (1) ◽  
pp. W42-W46 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Richard Hansberry ◽  
Michael D. White ◽  
Michael D'Angelo ◽  
Arpan V. Prabhu ◽  
Sarah Kamel ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. S794
Author(s):  
H. Robbins ◽  
M. Callister ◽  
P. Sasieni ◽  
S. Quaife ◽  
L. Cheung ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (S3) ◽  
pp. S297-S301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Cubillos ◽  
Alison T. Brenner ◽  
Katherine Birchard ◽  
Louise M. Henderson ◽  
Paul L. Molina ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19218-e19218
Author(s):  
Linda Sutton ◽  
Lisi Lotz ◽  
Eileen V. Horn ◽  
Trudy Pendergraft

e19218 Background: Lung cancer screening (LCS) has potential to detect earlier stage cancer, favorably impacting patient outcomes, however evolving data suggest that LCS is underutilized. Because LCS is an extensive process with diverse barriers specific to each clinical setting, a multidisciplinary quality improvement (QI) initiative was undertaken to develop and test LCS processes to improve effective LCS. Baseline findings and approaches are presented. Methods: To inform the development of effective strategies to improve LCS, a survey was developed to examine perceptions and barriers to LCS across a group of community oncology programs in the Duke Cancer Network (DCN). The survey analyzed contextual, institutional, and patient factors influencing utilization of LCS. Survey results were used to support purpose-driven multidisciplinary teams to develop site-specific improvement plans for LCS with the support of QI consultants from Bite-Size QI. Results: Surveys were sent to 62 administrators and providers at 12 community oncology programs, with 36 respondents across 9 sites. LCS rates ranged between 4%-16% at participating sites. Respondents identified the lack of processes and infrastructure to support LCS as the most common challenges. Processes related to identification of LCS candidates, conduct of shared decision-making (SDM), follow up of lung nodules, and recurring screens were named specifically. Contributing factors identified were lack of robust community outreach, patient education, and protocols for providers. With regard to SDM, both administrators and providers reported systematic issues including provider time constraints and nonexistent or inconsistent identification/tracking systems, with patient compliance and health literacy as further barriers. The lack of these processes not only affected patients receiving initial LCS, but also how recurrent screenings were tracked. Conclusions: Identifying challenges in processes facilitated creation of improvement projects for participating sites. Initial improvement projects focus on patient notification of LCS results through follow up letters, integration of tracking LCS into hospital systems, development of patient education, community outreach and smoking cessation programs. Follow-up analyses will be undertaken to evaluate each approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document