Experimental study on noise reduction effect of installing concrete deck on existing steel girders

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 205-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masamichi Saito ◽  
Ichiro Sugimoto ◽  
Eiichi Sasaki
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Noise Reduction ◽  
Steel Girders ◽  
Reduction Effect ◽  
Concrete Deck

scholarly journals Noise Reduction Effect of Superhydrophobic Surfaces with Streamwise Strip of Channel Flow

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 3869
Author(s):  
Chen Niu ◽  
Yongwei Liu ◽  
Dejiang Shang ◽  
Chao Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Drag Reduction ◽  
Noise Reduction ◽  
Channel Flow ◽  
Superhydrophobic Surface ◽  
Sound Field ◽  
Flow Noise ◽  
Slip Boundary ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Reduction Effect

Superhydrophobic surface is a promising technology, but the effect of superhydrophobic surface on flow noise is still unclear. Therefore, we used alternating free-slip and no-slip boundary conditions to study the flow noise of superhydrophobic channel flows with streamwise strips. The numerical calculations of the flow and the sound field have been carried out by the methods of large eddy simulation (LES) and Lighthill analogy, respectively. Under a constant pressure gradient (CPG) condition, the average Reynolds number and the friction Reynolds number are approximately set to 4200 and 180, respectively. The influence on noise of different gas fractions (GF) and strip number in a spanwise period on channel flow have been studied. Our results show that the superhydrophobic surface has noise reduction effect in some cases. Under CPG conditions, the increase in GF increases the bulk velocity and weakens the noise reduction effect. Otherwise, the increase in strip number enhances the lateral energy exchange of the superhydrophobic surface, and results in more transverse vortices and attenuates the noise reduction effect. In our results, the best noise reduction effect is obtained as 10.7 dB under the scenario of the strip number is 4 and GF is 0.5. The best drag reduction effect is 32%, and the result is obtained under the scenario of GF is 0.8 and strip number is 1. In summary, the choice of GF and the number of strips is comprehensively considered to guarantee the performance of drag reduction and noise reduction in this work.

Comparison of Noise Reduction Performance Evaluation Methods for Low-Noise Pavement in Korea- Part

2021 ◽  
Vol 263 (4) ◽  
pp. 2930-2939
Author(s):  
Byungchae Kim ◽  
Hyunjin Kim ◽  
Wonuk Kang
Keyword(s):  
Noise Reduction ◽  
Noise Level ◽  
Measurement Method ◽  
Road Traffic ◽  
Low Noise ◽  
Management Standards ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
Porous Pavement ◽  
Reduction Effect ◽  
Measurement Location

In Korea, road noise is assessed as a measurement method of exterior noise emitted by road vehicle for management standards by the National Institute of Environmental Sciences. In this method, the noise felt at the actual pickup point is measured as LAeq (the roadside equivalent noise level). Recently, to clarify the standard for measuring noise on low-noise pavements, the CPX (ISO11819-2; Close-proximity method) was first introduced in the Porous Pavement Guidelines of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. According to ISO, the CPX adopts the side microphone as a mandatory measurement location, and the rear optional. The side location has been a mandatory due to its high correlation with SPB (ISO 11819-1, Statistical Pass-by method). However, according to our previous study on the correlation evaluation between L and CPX rear microphone noise level, both noise reduction effect was about 9-12 dB(A) showed a high correlation in Korea where heavy road traffic is common. The following study aims to show the consistent correlation between the L and CPX rear noise level. Furthermore, it is intended to be helpful in selecting the location of the CPX microphone that can most effectively represent the actual noise on the low-noise pavement in Korea.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document