Practical Design Methods for Fire Resistance of Restrained Cellular Steel Beams

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1814-1839
Author(s):  
Xing Chen ◽  
Xiangrong Chen ◽  
Gang Li
2019 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. 284-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shenggang Fan ◽  
Li Du ◽  
Shuai Li ◽  
Liyuan Zhang ◽  
Ke Shi

Author(s):  
Carlos Couto ◽  
Thiago Silva ◽  
Martina Carić ◽  
Paulo Vila Real ◽  
Davor Skejić

<p>According to the Eurocode 3 Part 1-2 (EN1993-1-2) (CEN 2005b), it is possible for structural engineers to consider physical based thermal actions and to do performance based design instead of using prescriptive rules based on nominal fire curves. However, some uncertainties remain in the use of such approaches. This study focus on the clarification of the use of the simplified design methods to assess the fire resistance of unbraced steel frames exposed to fire. On the other hand, a recent study (Couto et al. 2013) suggests the use of a buckling coefficient of 1.0 for all the columns except those belonging to the first storey of a pinned framed where 2.0 should be taken instead and it is unclear if the consideration of such values for the buckling lengths is adequate when using performance based designs.</p>In this study, a comparison is made between simple and advanced calculation models and it is demonstrated that the simple design methods, using the suggested buckling coefficients to calculate the fire resistance of the frames are safe sided when compared to the use of advanced calculations using the finite element method (FEM).


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Couto ◽  
Élio Maia ◽  
Paulo Vila Real ◽  
Nuno Lopes

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess whether the adaptation to fire of current proposals/design methodologies at normal temperature is capable of producing accurate predictions of resistance for the out-of-plane stability of tapered beams. Design/methodology/approach The adaptation of these methodologies to fire has been done by accounting for the reduction in steel material properties with the temperature. Results were then compared to FEM calculations by performing GMNIA analyses to determine the ultimate strength of the numerical models and to ascertain the validity and accuracy of the adapted methodologies. Findings Although all methodologies produce safe results at normal temperatures, only the general method is recommended for the safety verification at elevated temperatures, although the data points were overly conservative. This investigation demonstrates the need of proper and accurate design methods for tapered beams at elevated temperatures, which should be the subject of future developments. Research limitations/implications The research in this paper is limited to the adaptation of existing room temperature design methods to fire. Therefore, possible assumptions made during the conception of the initial formulae, which may be valid exclusively for 20ºC, may have been disregarded. Originality/value For the time being, design methodologies for the safety check of tapered beams for the case of fire are inexistent. This paper investigates the adaptation of existing room temperature design to the fire situation by providing insights on their accuracy level, as well as on how to proceed. Finally, a safe design methodology for tapered beams in case of fire is provided until improved design methods are developed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 665-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek Łukomski ◽  
Piotr Turkowski ◽  
Paweł Roszkowski ◽  
Bartłomiej Papis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document