Deep learning-based condition assessment for bridge elastomeric bearings

Author(s):  
Mida Cui ◽  
Gang Wu ◽  
Ji Dang ◽  
ZhiQiang Chen ◽  
Minghua Zhou
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fan Wang ◽  
John P. Kerekes ◽  
Zhuoyi Xu ◽  
Yandong Wang

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghulam Hyder Palli ◽  
Ghulam Fiza Mirza ◽  
Ali Akbar Shah ◽  
Bhawani Shankar Chowdhry ◽  
Tanweer Hussain ◽  
...  

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (24) ◽  
pp. 7307
Author(s):  
Yuxi Zhou ◽  
Shenda Hong ◽  
Junyuan Shang ◽  
Meng Wu ◽  
Qingyun Wang ◽  
...  

Assessing the health condition has a wide range of applications in healthcare, military, aerospace, and industrial fields. Nevertheless, traditional feature-engineered techniques involve manual feature extraction, which are too cumbersome to adapt to the changes caused by the development of sensor network technology. Recently, deep-learning-based methods have achieved initial success in health-condition assessment research, but insufficient considerations for problems such as class skewness, noisy segments, and result interpretability make it difficult to apply them to real-world applications. In this paper, we propose a K-margin-based Interpretable Learning approach for health-condition assessment. In detail, a skewness-aware RCR-Net model is employed to handle problems of class skewness. Furthermore, we present a diagnosis model based on K-margin to automatically handle noisy segments by naturally exploiting expected consistency among the segments associated with each record. Additionally, a knowledge-directed interpretation method is presented to learn domain knowledge-level features automatically without the help of human experts which can be used as an interpretable decision-making basis. Finally, through experimental validation in the field of both medical and aerospace, the proposed method has a better generality and high efficiency with 0.7974 and 0.8005 F1 scores, which outperform all state-of-the-art deep learning methods for health-condition assessment task by 3.30% and 2.99%, respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document