scholarly journals Knowledge-based sentence semantic similarity: algebraical properties

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mourad Oussalah ◽  
Muhidin Mohamed
Keyword(s):  
Information Retrieval ◽  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
Semantic Similarity ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Similarity Measures ◽  
Canonical Extension ◽  
Similarity Score ◽  
Semantic Similarity Measure ◽  
Sentence Similarity

AbstractDetermining the extent to which two text snippets are semantically equivalent is a well-researched topic in the areas of natural language processing, information retrieval and text summarization. The sentence-to-sentence similarity scoring is extensively used in both generic and query-based summarization of documents as a significance or a similarity indicator. Nevertheless, most of these applications utilize the concept of semantic similarity measure only as a tool, without paying importance to the inherent properties of such tools that ultimately restrict the scope and technical soundness of the underlined applications. This paper aims to contribute to fill in this gap. It investigates three popular WordNet hierarchical semantic similarity measures, namely path-length, Wu and Palmer and Leacock and Chodorow, from both algebraical and intuitive properties, highlighting their inherent limitations and theoretical constraints. We have especially examined properties related to range and scope of the semantic similarity score, incremental monotonicity evolution, monotonicity with respect to hyponymy/hypernymy relationship as well as a set of interactive properties. Extension from word semantic similarity to sentence similarity has also been investigated using a pairwise canonical extension. Properties of the underlined sentence-to-sentence similarity are examined and scrutinized. Next, to overcome inherent limitations of WordNet semantic similarity in terms of accounting for various Part-of-Speech word categories, a WordNet “All word-To-Noun conversion” that makes use of Categorial Variation Database (CatVar) is put forward and evaluated using a publicly available dataset with a comparison with some state-of-the-art methods. The finding demonstrates the feasibility of the proposal and opens up new opportunities in information retrieval and natural language processing tasks.

Similarity of Sentences With Contradiction Using Semantic Similarity Measures

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Krishna Siva Prasad ◽  
Poonam Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
Semantic Similarity ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Word Order ◽  
Similarity Measures ◽  
Semantic Features ◽  
Short Text ◽  
Sentence Similarity ◽  
Expert Ratings

Abstract Short text or sentence similarity is crucial in various natural language processing activities. Traditional measures for sentence similarity consider word order, semantic features and role annotations of text to derive the similarity. These measures do not suit short texts or sentences with negation. Hence, this paper proposes an approach to determine the semantic similarity of sentences and also presents an algorithm to handle negation. In sentence similarity, word pair similarity plays a significant role. Hence, this paper also discusses the similarity between word pairs. Existing semantic similarity measures do not handle antonyms accurately. Hence, this paper proposes an algorithm to handle antonyms. This paper also presents an antonym dataset with 111-word pairs and corresponding expert ratings. The existing semantic similarity measures are tested on the dataset. The results of the correlation proved that the expert ratings are in order with the correlation obtained from the semantic similarity measures. The sentence similarity is handled by proposing two algorithms. The first algorithm deals with the typical sentences, and the second algorithm deals with contradiction in the sentences. SICK dataset, which has sentences with negation, is considered for handling the sentence similarity. The algorithm helped in improving the results of sentence similarity.

LIS4: Lesk Inspired Sense Specific Semantic Similarity using WordNet

2021 ◽  
pp. 2150006
Author(s):  
Saravanakumar Kandasamy ◽  
Aswani Kumar Cherukuri
Keyword(s):  
Information Retrieval ◽  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
Semantic Similarity ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Question Answering ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Benchmark Datasets ◽  
Processing Information

Semantic similarity quantification between concepts is one of the inevitable parts in domains like Natural Language Processing, Information Retrieval, Question Answering, etc. to understand the text and their relationships better. Last few decades, many measures have been proposed by incorporating various corpus-based and knowledge-based resources. WordNet and Wikipedia are two of the Knowledge-based resources. The contribution of WordNet in the above said domain is enormous due to its richness in defining a word and all of its relationship with others. In this paper, we proposed an approach to quantify the similarity between concepts that exploits the synsets and the gloss definitions of different concepts using WordNet. Our method considers the gloss definitions, contextual words that are helping in defining a word, synsets of contextual word and the confidence of occurrence of a word in other word’s definition for calculating the similarity. The evaluation based on different gold standard benchmark datasets shows the efficiency of our system in comparison with other existing taxonomical and definitional measures.

scholarly journals Predicting Semantic Similarity Between Clinical Sentence Pairs Using Transformer Models: Evaluation and Representational Analysis (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Ormerod ◽  
Jesús Martínez del Rincón ◽  
Barry Devereux
Keyword(s):  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
Semantic Similarity ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Ground Truth ◽  
Similarity Score ◽  
General Tendency ◽  
Sentence Pair ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Semantic Textual Similarity

BACKGROUND Semantic textual similarity (STS) is a natural language processing (NLP) task that involves assigning a similarity score to 2 snippets of text based on their meaning. This task is particularly difficult in the domain of clinical text, which often features specialized language and the frequent use of abbreviations. OBJECTIVE We created an NLP system to predict similarity scores for sentence pairs as part of the Clinical Semantic Textual Similarity track in the 2019 n2c2/OHNLP Shared Task on Challenges in Natural Language Processing for Clinical Data. We subsequently sought to analyze the intermediary token vectors extracted from our models while processing a pair of clinical sentences to identify where and how representations of semantic similarity are built in transformer models. METHODS Given a clinical sentence pair, we take the average predicted similarity score across several independently fine-tuned transformers. In our model analysis we investigated the relationship between the final model’s loss and surface features of the sentence pairs and assessed the decodability and representational similarity of the token vectors generated by each model. RESULTS Our model achieved a correlation of 0.87 with the ground-truth similarity score, reaching 6th place out of 33 teams (with a first-place score of 0.90). In detailed qualitative and quantitative analyses of the model’s loss, we identified the system’s failure to correctly model semantic similarity when both sentence pairs contain details of medical prescriptions, as well as its general tendency to overpredict semantic similarity given significant token overlap. The token vector analysis revealed divergent representational strategies for predicting textual similarity between bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT)–style models and XLNet. We also found that a large amount information relevant to predicting STS can be captured using a combination of a classification token and the cosine distance between sentence-pair representations in the first layer of a transformer model that did not produce the best predictions on the test set. CONCLUSIONS We designed and trained a system that uses state-of-the-art NLP models to achieve very competitive results on a new clinical STS data set. As our approach uses no hand-crafted rules, it serves as a strong deep learning baseline for this task. Our key contribution is a detailed analysis of the model’s outputs and an investigation of the heuristic biases learned by transformer models. We suggest future improvements based on these findings. In our representational analysis we explore how different transformer models converge or diverge in their representation of semantic signals as the tokens of the sentences are augmented by successive layers. This analysis sheds light on how these “black box” models integrate semantic similarity information in intermediate layers, and points to new research directions in model distillation and sentence embedding extraction for applications in clinical NLP.

scholarly journals Predicting Semantic Similarity Between Clinical Sentence Pairs Using Transformer Models: Evaluation and Representational Analysis

10.2196/23099 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e23099
Author(s):  
Mark Ormerod ◽  
Jesús Martínez del Rincón ◽  
Barry Devereux
Keyword(s):  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
Semantic Similarity ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Ground Truth ◽  
Similarity Score ◽  
General Tendency ◽  
Sentence Pair ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Semantic Textual Similarity

Background Semantic textual similarity (STS) is a natural language processing (NLP) task that involves assigning a similarity score to 2 snippets of text based on their meaning. This task is particularly difficult in the domain of clinical text, which often features specialized language and the frequent use of abbreviations. Objective We created an NLP system to predict similarity scores for sentence pairs as part of the Clinical Semantic Textual Similarity track in the 2019 n2c2/OHNLP Shared Task on Challenges in Natural Language Processing for Clinical Data. We subsequently sought to analyze the intermediary token vectors extracted from our models while processing a pair of clinical sentences to identify where and how representations of semantic similarity are built in transformer models. Methods Given a clinical sentence pair, we take the average predicted similarity score across several independently fine-tuned transformers. In our model analysis we investigated the relationship between the final model’s loss and surface features of the sentence pairs and assessed the decodability and representational similarity of the token vectors generated by each model. Results Our model achieved a correlation of 0.87 with the ground-truth similarity score, reaching 6th place out of 33 teams (with a first-place score of 0.90). In detailed qualitative and quantitative analyses of the model’s loss, we identified the system’s failure to correctly model semantic similarity when both sentence pairs contain details of medical prescriptions, as well as its general tendency to overpredict semantic similarity given significant token overlap. The token vector analysis revealed divergent representational strategies for predicting textual similarity between bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT)–style models and XLNet. We also found that a large amount information relevant to predicting STS can be captured using a combination of a classification token and the cosine distance between sentence-pair representations in the first layer of a transformer model that did not produce the best predictions on the test set. Conclusions We designed and trained a system that uses state-of-the-art NLP models to achieve very competitive results on a new clinical STS data set. As our approach uses no hand-crafted rules, it serves as a strong deep learning baseline for this task. Our key contribution is a detailed analysis of the model’s outputs and an investigation of the heuristic biases learned by transformer models. We suggest future improvements based on these findings. In our representational analysis we explore how different transformer models converge or diverge in their representation of semantic signals as the tokens of the sentences are augmented by successive layers. This analysis sheds light on how these “black box” models integrate semantic similarity information in intermediate layers, and points to new research directions in model distillation and sentence embedding extraction for applications in clinical NLP.

scholarly journals A New Hypred Improved Method for Measuring Concept Semantic Similarity in WordNet

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 433-439
Author(s):  
Xiaogang Zhang ◽  
Shouqian Sun ◽  
Kejun Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Knowledge Management ◽  
Information Retrieval ◽  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Semantic Similarity ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Similarity Measures ◽  
Improved Method ◽  
Hierarchical Tree ◽  
Semantic Computation

Computing semantic similarity between concepts is an important issue in natural language processing, artificial intelligence, information retrieval and knowledge management. The measure of computing concept similarity is a fundament of semantic computation. In this paper, we analyze typical semantic similarity measures and note Wu and Palmer’s measure which does not distinguish the similarities between nodes from a node to different nodes of the same level. Then, we synthesize the advantages of measure of path-based and IC-based, and propose a new hybrid method for measuring semantic similarity. By testing on a fragment of WordNet hierarchical tree, the results demonstrate the proposed method accurately distinguishes the similarities between nodes from a node to different nodes of the same level and overcome the shortcoming of the Wu and Palmer’s measure

scholarly journals A Comparison of Approaches for Measuring the Semantic Similarity of Short Texts Based on Word Embeddings

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-246
Author(s):  
Karlo Babić ◽  
Francesco Guerra ◽  
Sanda Martinčić-Ipšić ◽  
Ana Meštrović
Keyword(s):  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
Semantic Similarity ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Similarity Measures ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
The Other ◽  
Word Embeddings ◽  
Spearman Correlation ◽  
Word Senses

Measuring the semantic similarity of texts has a vital role in various tasks from the field of natural language processing. In this paper, we describe a set of experiments we carried out to evaluate and compare the performance of different approaches for measuring the semantic similarity of short texts. We perform a comparison of four models based on word embeddings: two variants of Word2Vec (one based on Word2Vec trained on a specific dataset and the second extending it with embeddings of word senses), FastText, and TF-IDF. Since these models provide word vectors, we experiment with various methods that calculate the semantic similarity of short texts based on word vectors. More precisely, for each of these models, we test five methods for aggregating word embeddings into text embedding. We introduced three methods by making variations of two commonly used similarity measures. One method is an extension of the cosine similarity based on centroids, and the other two methods are variations of the Okapi BM25 function. We evaluate all approaches on the two publicly available datasets: SICK and Lee in terms of the Pearson and Spearman correlation. The results indicate that extended methods perform better from the original in most of the cases.

Report on the 4th Joint Workshop on Bibliometric-Enhanced Information Retrieval and Natural Language Processing for Digital Libraries at SIGIR 2019

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-10
Author(s):  
Muthu Kumar Chandrasekaran ◽  
Philipp Mayr
Keyword(s):  
Information Retrieval ◽  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
Research And Development ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Digital Libraries ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Shared Task ◽  
Processing Information ◽  
Joint Workshop

The 4 th joint BIRNDL workshop was held at the 42nd ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 2019) in Paris, France. BIRNDL 2019 intended to stimulate IR researchers and digital library professionals to elaborate on new approaches in natural language processing, information retrieval, scientometrics, and recommendation techniques that can advance the state-of-the-art in scholarly document understanding, analysis, and retrieval at scale. The workshop incorporated different paper sessions and the 5 th edition of the CL-SciSumm Shared Task.

scholarly journals A Natural Language Processing Approach to Measuring Treatment Adherence and Consistency Using Semantic Similarity

AERA Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 233285842110286
Author(s):  
Kylie L. Anglin ◽  
Vivian C. Wong ◽  
Arielle Boguslav
Keyword(s):  
Natural Language Processing ◽  
Natural Language ◽  
Semantic Similarity ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Intervention Implementation ◽  
Proof Of Concept ◽  
Coaching Intervention ◽  
Processing Techniques ◽  
Teacher Coaching ◽  
The Impact

Though there is widespread recognition of the importance of implementation research, evaluators often face intense logistical, budgetary, and methodological challenges in their efforts to assess intervention implementation in the field. This article proposes a set of natural language processing techniques called semantic similarity as an innovative and scalable method of measuring implementation constructs. Semantic similarity methods are an automated approach to quantifying the similarity between texts. By applying semantic similarity to transcripts of intervention sessions, researchers can use the method to determine whether an intervention was delivered with adherence to a structured protocol, and the extent to which an intervention was replicated with consistency across sessions, sites, and studies. This article provides an overview of semantic similarity methods, describes their application within the context of educational evaluations, and provides a proof of concept using an experimental study of the impact of a standardized teacher coaching intervention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document