Prognostic value of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis scoring system for overt disseminated intravascular coagulation in emergency department sepsis

Infection ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 629-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. Yin ◽  
B. Liu ◽  
Y. Chen ◽  
Y. Zhao ◽  
C. Li
2017 ◽  
Vol 137 (3) ◽  
pp. 132-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Wei ◽  
Ting Niu ◽  
Mengyao Wang ◽  
Jinrong Yang ◽  
Pengpeng Liu ◽  
...  

To retrospectively validate the prognostic value of the latest Chinese disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) scoring system (CDSS) in hematological malignancies, 260 patients with confirmed hematological malignancies and suspected DIC in West China Hospital between 2011 and 2015 were included in this study. We evaluated via univariate and multivariate analyses the diagnostic biomarkers, and the cutoff levels used in the CDSS, except those for fibrinogen, were found to be valid. In subgroup analyses, the value of fibrinogen was found to be mainly unfit for the acute promyelocytic leukemia group. Forty-six patients (17.7%) had elevated fibrinogen levels (>4 g/L) and tended to have a poor prognosis, and thus we redetermined the cutoff value of fibrinogen (<1 g/L or >4 g/L was defined as abnormal). As a result, all of the markers used in the CDSS had prognostic value (including for the promyelocytic leukemia group); meanwhile, this modification also resulted in a larger area under the receiver operating characteristic curve compared to the CDSS and the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis score. We believe that, with regard to prognosis prediction, this cutoff value modification for fibrinogen is preferable for DIC patients with a tendency toward severe hypofibrinogenemia. However, a multicenter, prospective study is needed to validate this possibility.


Author(s):  
Aditi Aggarwal ◽  
Deepti Mahajan ◽  
Poonam Sharma

Abstract Background Coagulation abnormalities are common in acute leukemia (AL) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) frequently complicates the onset of AL. Aim To determine the prevalence of overt DIC in AL using the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) scoring system. Materials and Methods This prospective observational study was performed on 57 newly diagnosed or relapsed cases of AL. Detailed clinical history and coagulation profile of the patients were evaluated. Diagnosis of overt and nonovert DIC was established using the ISTH scoring system and results tabulated. Observations A total of 57 patients with AL participated in the study, including 31 (54.39%) patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and 26 (45.61%) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In total, 18 of 57 patients (31.58%) with AL fulfilled the criteria of overt DIC according to the ISTH scoring system, including 10 (32.25%) patients with ALL and 8 (30.76%) patients with AML. The highest prevalence of DIC was seen in the M3 subtype among AML and the L1 subtype among ALL, respectively. The mean ISTH score in patients of overt DIC in ALL and AML patients was 5.1 and 5, respectively. Abnormalities in platelet count and D-dimer levels were the most useful parameters in diagnosing overt DIC and the difference between overt DIC and nonovert DIC groups was highly significant. Conclusions Overt DIC was observed in approximately one-third of patients with AL. Prevalence of overt DIC was found to be comparable in patients with ALL and AML. Mean platelet count and D-dimer levels were the most useful parameters in detecting overt DIC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document