Surgical Treatment Options of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Summer E. Hanson ◽  
Carrie K. Chu ◽  
Edward I. Chang
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Anne Durand ◽  
Renata West Yen ◽  
James O’Malley ◽  
Danielle Schubbe ◽  
Mary C. Politi ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 77-85
Author(s):  
Johanna E. Maree ◽  
Dalene Beckmann

An exploratory qualitative research approach was selected for this study aiming to explore how people living with breast cancer related lymphedema experience this complication. Unstructured interviews were conducted with nine purposively selected participants. Living with breast cancer related lymphedema was not easy. Participants were not informed of the possibility of developing lymphedema and felt let down by the medical professionals they consulted. They had to face the physical, psychological and practical consequences without the continuous support of a knowledgeable therapist. Managing the lymphedema was a challenge as they could not afford the necessary treatment and theself-care items. In addition, treatment failure resulted in them feeling exploited and using various treatment options. Nurses should maintain a high level of suspicion of breastcancer related lymphedema, assess patients for lymphedema and refer them to a therapist specifically trained in the management of this debilitating condition.Hierdie studie ondersoek die belewenis van mense met borskanker verwante limfedeem.‘n Kwalitatiewe eksploratiewe navorsingsontwerp is gekies en ongestruktureerde onderhoude is met nege doelgerig gekose persone gevoer. Limfedeem kompliseer die lewe en die proefpersone het die nie maklik gevind om daarmee saam te leef nie. Hulle is nie ingelig oor die moonlikhied om limfedeem te ontwikkel nie en was van mening dat hulle deur die medici wat hulle behandel het in die steek gelaat is. Die proefpersone moes die fisiese, psigologiese en praktiese gevolge van limfedeem sonder die bystand van ‘n kundige terapeut te bowe kom. Die hantering van die limfedeem was ‘n uitdaging aangesien hulle nie die behandeling en self-sorg artikels kon bekostig nie. Die slegte resultate van behandeling het tot gevolg gehad dat die proefpersone uitgebuit gevoel het en ook verskillende behandelingsopsies gevolg het. Verpleegkundiges moet ‘n hoë vlak van bewustheid ten opsigte van limfedeem handhaaf, pasiënte hiervoor beraam en na ‘n terapeut wat in limfedeem spesialieer verwys.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Yang ◽  
Xiaorong Zhong ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Ting Luo ◽  
Ping He ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Both breast-conserving surgery and breast reconstruction surgery are less popular in China, although they can improve patients' quality of life. The main reason comes from the economy. There is currently no economic evaluation of different surgical treatment options for early breast cancer. Our study aimed to evaluate the long-term cost-utilities of different surgical treatment approaches for early breast cancer. The surgical approaches are including mastectomy(MAST), breast-conserving therapy(BCT), and mastectomy with reconstruction (MAST+RECON). Methods We applied the propensity score matching method to perform a 1: 1 match on patients undergoing these three types of surgery in a tertiary academic medical center from 2011 to 2017 to obtain a balanced sample of covariates between groups. A Markov model was established. Clinical data and cost data were obtained from the medical records. Health utility values were derived from clinical investigations. Strategies were compared using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results The total cost of MAST, MAST+RECON and BCT was $35,282.24, $69,428.82 and $73,661.08, respectively. The discounted quality-adjusted life year(QALYs) were 17.94, 18.71 and 20.49, respectively. Compared with MAST, MAST+RECON and BCT have an ICER of $106708.06/QALY and $15050.53/QALY, respectively. The ICER of BCT vs. MAST was less than the threshold of $27,931.04. The reliability and stability of the results were confirmed by Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity analysis. Conclusions We believe that in the context of the limited resources in China, after comparing the three surgical approaches, BCT is the more cost-effective and preferred solution.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Yang ◽  
Xiaorong Zhong ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Ting Luo ◽  
Ping He ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Both breast-conserving surgery and breast reconstruction surgery are less popular in China, although they can improve patients' quality of life. The main reason comes from the economy. There is currently no economic evaluation of different surgical treatment options for early breast cancer. Our study aims to assess the economic impact and long-term cost-effectiveness of different surgical treatments for early breast cancer. The surgical approaches are including mastectomy (MAST), breast-conserving therapy (BCT), and mastectomy with reconstruction (MAST+RECON).Methods: We applied the propensity score matching method to perform a 1: 1 match on patients undergoing these three types of surgery in a tertiary academic medical center from 2011 to 2017 to obtain a balanced sample of covariates between groups. A Markov model was established. Clinical data and cost data were obtained from the medical records. Health utility values were derived from clinical investigations. Strategies were compared using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).Results: The total cost of MAST, MAST+RECON and BCT was $35,282.24, $69,428.82 and $73,661.08, respectively. The quality-adjusted life year (QALYs) were 17.94, 18.71 and 20.49, respectively. Compared with MAST, MAST+RECON and BCT have an ICER of $106708.06/QALY and $15050.53/QALY, respectively. The ICER of BCT vs. MAST was less than the threshold of $27,931.04. The reliability and stability of the results were confirmed by Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity analysis.Conclusions: We believe that in the context of the limited resources in China, after comparing the three surgical approaches, BCT is the more cost-effective and preferred solution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document