Effects of Sodium-glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors on Amputation, Bone Fracture, and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Using an Alternative Measure to the Hazard Ratio

: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is one of the most common forms of the disease worldwide. Hyperglycemia and insulin resistance play key roles in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Renal glucose reabsorption is an essential feature in glycaemic control. Kidneys filter 160 g of glucose daily in healthy subjects under euglycaemic conditions. The expanding epidemic of diabetes leads to a prevalence of diabetes-related cardiovascular disorders, in particular, heart failure and renal dysfunction. Cellular glucose uptake is a fundamental process for homeostasis, growth, and metabolism. In humans, three families of glucose transporters have been identified, including the glucose facilitators GLUTs, the sodium-glucose cotransporter SGLTs, and the recently identified SWEETs. Structures of the major isoforms of all three families were studied. Sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT2) provides most of the capacity for renal glucose reabsorption in the early proximal tubule. A number of cardiovascular outcome trials in patients with type 2 diabetes have been studied with SGLT2 inhibitors reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. : The current review article summarises these aspects and discusses possible mechanisms with SGLT2 inhibitors in protecting heart failure and renal dysfunction in diabetic patients. Through glucosuria, SGLT2 inhibitors reduce body weight and body fat, and shift substrate utilisation from carbohydrates to lipids and, possibly, ketone bodies. These pleiotropic effects of SGLT2 inhibitors are likely to have contributed to the results of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial in which the SGLT2 inhibitor, empagliflozin, slowed down the progression of chronic kidney disease and reduced major adverse cardiovascular events in high-risk individuals with type 2 diabetes. This review discusses the role of SGLT2 in the physiology and pathophysiology of renal glucose reabsorption and outlines the unexpected logic of inhibiting SGLT2 in the diabetic kidney.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Cardiovascular Safety of Meglitinides

Current Drug Safety ◽

10.2174/1574886315666201026125848 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 15 ◽

Author(s):

Jim Philip ◽

Cornelius James Fernandez

Keyword(s):

Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Type 2 Diabetes ◽

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Cardiovascular Outcomes ◽

Individual Therapy ◽

Hypoglycemic Agents ◽

Current Evidence ◽

Minimal Risk ◽

Cardiovascular Safety

: Meglitinides are a group of oral hypoglycemic medications currently approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Two meglitinide molecules, Repaglinide and Nateglinide,are presently in use. Repaglinide is preferred because of its superior glycemic efficacy.They have modest efficacy with a mean decrement of glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ranging between -0.2 to -1.50% with individual therapy. Additional HbA1c reduction can occur with combination therapy with other oral hypoglycemics. This class of drugs is effective in controlling postprandial hyperglycemia with minimal risk of hypoglycemia.It is also useful in patients in with variable meal timings, especially in the elderly, and in patients with renal failure. There are is a dearth of long-term studies on meglitinides to assess cardiovascular outcomes or mortality in T2DM,although the Nateglinide and Valsartan in Impaired Glucose ToleranceOutcomes Research (NAVIGATOR) study showed no difference between Nateglinide and placebo with regard to the core composite cardiovascular outcomes. Based on a PubMed literature search using key words: ‘meglitinides’, ‘repaglinide’, ‘nateglinide’, ‘HbA1c’, ‘glycated haemoglobin’, ‘cardiovascular safety’, ‘cardiovascular events’, ‘cardiovascular outcome trials’, ‘type 2 diabetes mellitus’ and heart failure, and combining the search terms using Boolean operators ‘AND’, ‘OR’ and ‘NOT’ as needed we compiled current evidence for use of these oral hypoglycemic agents in clinical use. This article is an attempt to review the efficacy and cardiovascular (CV) safety of Meglitinides to help clinicians to use this class of oral hypoglycaemic agents prudently.

Download Full-text

Effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a propensity score-matched analysis of real-world data

Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism ◽

10.1177/20420188211000243 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 ◽

pp. 204201882110002

Author(s):

Taeang Arai ◽

Masanori Atsukawa ◽

Akihito Tsubota ◽

Shigeru Mikami ◽

Hiroki Ono ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Type 2 Diabetes ◽

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Propensity Score ◽

Fatty Liver Disease ◽

Liver Inflammation ◽

Alcoholic Fatty Liver ◽

Sodium Glucose Cotransporter ◽

Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Background: Although sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) improve not only glycemic control but also liver inflammation and fatty changes in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), its sustainability and effect on liver fibrosis have remained unclear. The current study aimed to clarify the effects of 48-week SGLT2-I therapy on liver inflammation, fatty changes, and fibrosis in NAFLD patients with T2DM. Methods: This study evaluated the effects of SGLT2-I on NAFLD, including liver fibrosis assessed via transient elastography, in 56 patients with NAFLD who received SGLT2-I for 48 weeks. Moreover, changes in each clinical parameter between patients receiving SGLT2-I (the SGLT2-I group) and those receiving other oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) (the non-SGLT2-I group) were compared, using 1:1 propensity score matching to adjust for baseline factors. Results: The SGLT2-I group exhibited a significant decrease in controlled attenuation parameter (312 dB/m at baseline to 280 dB/m at week 48) and liver stiffness measurement (9.1–6.7 kPa) ( p < 0.001 for both). After propensity score matching (44 patients each in the SGLT2-I and non-SGLT2-I groups), no significant difference in HbA1c decrease was observed between the two groups. However, compared with the non-SGLT2-I group, the SGLT2-I group showed a significant decrease in body weight ( p < 0.001), alanine aminotransferase ( p = 0.02), uric acid ( p < 0.001), and Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index ( p = 0.01) at week 48. The improvement in FIB-4 index, defined as a ⩾10% decline from baseline at week 48, was 56.8% (25/44) in the SGLT2-I group and 20.5% (9/44) in the non-SGLT2-I group ( p < 0.001). Conclusion: SGLT2-Is improved not only glycemic control but also liver fatty infiltration and fibrosis in patients with NAFLD and T2DM, suggesting their possible superiority to other OHAs concerning these effects.

Download Full-text