Cost-Effectiveness of Tenofovir Alafenamide for Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B in Canada

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Tian ◽  
Sherilyn K. D. Houle ◽  
Mhd. Wasem Alsabbagh ◽  
William W. L. Wong
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eiichi Ogawa ◽  
Makoto Nakamuta ◽  
Toshimasa Koyanagi ◽  
Aritsune Ooho ◽  
Norihiro Furusyo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and AimsOutcome data of sequential hepatitis B virus treatment with tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) are limited. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and renal safety of TAF in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who were previously treated with entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), or nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) combination. MethodsThis multicenter, retrospective, cohort study included 458 consecutive CHB patients who switched to TAF monotherapy after at least two years of treatment with another NA. The longitudinal virological/laboratory responses were evaluated up to 96 weeks after switchover. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)<60 mL/min/1.73m2. ResultsThe proportions of HBV DNA suppression (HBV DNA<20 IU/mL) at week 96 were 99.0%, 97.8%, and 98.4% in the prior ETV (n=198), TDF (n=137), and NA combination (n=123) groups, respectively. Almost all patients with HBV DNA of 20-2000 IU/mL at baseline achieved HBV DNA suppression at week 96. On multivariable generalized estimated equation (GEE) analysis, a low quantitative hepatitis surface antigen (qHBsAg) level at baseline was associated with a lower follow-up qHBsAg level (coefficient 0.81, P<0.001). The eGFR showed greater improvement in patients with CKD compared to those with non-CKD according to the multivariable GEE analysis (coefficient 21.7, P<0.001). However, the increase of eGFR reached a peak between weeks 24 and 48. ConclusionsBased on this longitudinal data analysis up to 96 weeks, sequential NA therapy with a switch to TAF is a good option to better achieve high viral suppression and renal safety.


Gut ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. gutjnl-2020-321309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hye-Lin Kim ◽  
Gi-Ae Kim ◽  
Jae-A Park ◽  
Hye-Rim Kang ◽  
Eui-Kyung Lee ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe cost-effectiveness of antiviral treatment in adult immune-tolerant (IT) phase chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients is uncertain.DesignWe designed a Markov model to compare expected costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of starting antiviral treatment at IT-phase (‘treat-IT’) vs delaying the therapy until active hepatitis phase (‘untreat-IT’) in CHB patients over a 20-year horizon. A cohort of 10 000 non-cirrhotic 35-year-old patients in IT-phase CHB (hepatitis B e antigen-positive, mean serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels 7.6 log10 IU/mL, and normal alanine aminotransferase levels) was simulated. Input parameters were obtained from previous studies at Asan Medical Center, Korea. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between the treat-IT and untreat-IT strategies was calculated.ResultsFrom a healthcare system perspective, the treat-IT strategy with entecavir or tenofovir had an ICER of US$16 516/QALY, with an annual hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence of 0.73% in the untreat-IT group. With the annual HCC risk ≥0.54%, the treat-IT strategy was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$20 000/QALY. From a societal perspective considering productivity loss by premature death, the treat-IT strategy was extremely cost-effective, and was dominant (ICER <0) if the HCC risk was ≥0.43%, suggesting that the treat-IT strategy incurs less costs than the untreat-IT strategy. The most influential parameters on cost-effectiveness of the treat-IT strategy were those related with HCC risk (HBV DNA levels, platelet counts and age) and drug cost.ConclusionStarting antiviral therapy in IT phase is cost-effective compared with delaying the treatment until the active hepatitis phase in CHB patients, especially with increasing HCC risk, decreasing drug costs and consideration of productivity loss.


Author(s):  
Henry Lik-Yeun Chan ◽  
Patrick Marcellin ◽  
Andrew L Cathcart ◽  
Neeru Bhardwaj ◽  
John F Flaherty ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document