Patient-reported outcome labelling still rare in the US

2016 ◽  
Vol 752 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-31
2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 396-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han-Chung Lien ◽  
Chen-Chi Wang ◽  
Shou-Wu Lee ◽  
Jeng-Yuan Hsu ◽  
Hong-Zen Yeh ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (23) ◽  
pp. 4002-4020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann T. Farrell ◽  
Julie Panepinto ◽  
Ankit A. Desai ◽  
Adetola A. Kassim ◽  
Jeffrey Lebensburger ◽  
...  

Abstract To address the global burden of sickle cell disease and the need for novel therapies, the American Society of Hematology partnered with the US Food and Drug Administration to engage the work of 7 panels of clinicians, investigators, and patients to develop consensus recommendations for clinical trial end points. The panels conducted their work through literature reviews, assessment of available evidence, and expert judgment focusing on end points related to patient-reported outcome, pain (non–patient-reported outcomes), the brain, end-organ considerations, biomarkers, measurement of cure, and low-resource settings. This article presents the findings and recommendations of the end-organ considerations, measurement of cure, and low-resource settings panels as well as relevant findings and recommendations from the biomarkers panel.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (32) ◽  
pp. 5094-5099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin P. Rock ◽  
Dianne L. Kennedy ◽  
Melissa H. Furness ◽  
William F. Pierce ◽  
Richard Pazdur ◽  
...  

In 2006, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published draft guidance to provide recommendations for development, validation, implementation, and interpretation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures that can support treatment benefit claims in product labeling. Here, we summarize and discuss FDA approvals of anticancer products in the context of the draft guidance. We identified anticancer product approvals having efficacy claim(s) based at least in part on a PRO. In addition, we collated limitations of PRO instruments commonly submitted for regulatory review over the period from October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2006. From 1995 onward, nine indications were approved for seven anticancer products based at least in part on a PRO. In eight of nine approvals, PRO data supplemented other evidence of clinical benefit. In seven approvals, the PRO measured a single symptom or functional domain that was directly attributable to the treatment benefit observed in the disease. The FDA's draft PRO guidance describes principles that have been used in anticancer product approvals for more than a decade. PRO end points typically support treatment benefit claims that refer to a patient's symptoms or ability to function. Single-item PROs may be acceptable. PRO data should be both internally consistent and aligned with other evidence of clinical benefit. The FDA encourages sponsors to consult with the FDA early in the process of PRO development.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1433426
Author(s):  
Szymon Jarosławski ◽  
Pascal Auquier ◽  
Borislav Borissov ◽  
Claude Dussart ◽  
Mondher Toumi

2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (3) ◽  
pp. S101-S102
Author(s):  
Julia Schuchard ◽  
Michael Kappelman ◽  
Andrew Grossman ◽  
Jennifer Clegg ◽  
Christopher Forrest

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document