Reversing Time and Size: Mutual Entailment of Nonarbitrary Temporal and Magnitude Relational Responding

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Brassil ◽  
John Hyland ◽  
Denis O’Hora ◽  
Ian Stewart
Keyword(s):  
Relational Responding ◽  
Mutual Entailment

Transposition in Pigeons: Multiple-Pair Training Facilitates Relational Responding

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga F. Lazareva ◽  
Michelle Miner ◽  
Edward A. Wasserman ◽  
Michael E. Young
Keyword(s):  
Relational Responding

Biochemical Transfer of Relational Responding (Transposition)

Science ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 176 (4037) ◽  
pp. 942-944 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. W. Braud ◽  
W. G. Braud
Keyword(s):  
Relational Responding

scholarly journals Relating is an Operant: A Fly Over of 35 Years of RFT Research

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven C. Hayes ◽  
Stu Law ◽  
Kian Assemi ◽  
Neal Falletta-Cowden ◽  
Melia Shamblin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Relational Frame Theory ◽  
Comprehensive Evaluation ◽  
Relational Learning ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Frame Theory ◽  
Paper Briefly ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Relational Responding ◽  
Relational Frame ◽  
Type Of Behavior

Relational Frame Theory (RFT) is the simplest form of operant theory since it claims nothing more than a particular type of behavior, arbitrarily applicable derived relational responding, is an operant. While the theory is simple, its implications are not, and adoption has been slow until recently. RFT was first formally described in 1985 and in the 35 years since, hundreds of studies have been conducted on relational learning from an operant point of view. The present paper briefly summarizes that history and examines some of its key claims. So far, the empirical program delineated by RFT has held up remarkably well. Future directions are delineated that will enable a more comprehensive evaluation of the importance of the RFT research program, and a more thorough exploration of its profound implications.

Derived Relational Responding as Learned Behavior

2005 ◽  
pp. 21-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven C. Hayes ◽  
Eric Fox ◽  
Elizabeth V. Gifford ◽  
Kelly G. Wilson ◽  
Dermot Barnes-Holmes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Derived Relational Responding ◽  
Relational Responding ◽  
Learned Behavior

Conjoined Fraternal Twins: Marking Something Other than Time in Matthew 13.44-46

2020 ◽  
pp. 0142064X2097390
Author(s):  
Mark A. Proctor
Keyword(s):  
Kingdom Of Heaven ◽  
Mutual Entailment ◽  
The Right ◽  
Experience Difficulty

While some read Mt. 13.44-46 as making the same point about the kingdom of heaven twice over, this article instead uses verbal markedness theory to suggest use of the perfect tense-form within Treasure in the Field (TIF) and Pearl of Great Price (PGP) indicates otherwise. Whereas TIF foregrounds the kingdom’s ‘hiddenness’ with κεκρυμμένῳ, PGP instead uses πέπρακεν to emphasize the toll its purchase exacts on investors. Hence, one might accurately describe the parables on the basis of verbal markedness theory, and their redactional similarities, as a set of fraternal twins the First Gospel conjoins within the parables discourse. While their individual points remain distinct, Matthew binds the implications of TIF and PGP together to suggest their mutual entailment. For those fortunate enough to uncover the hidden kingdom’s location, its entrance will cost them everything and so alter their lives forever. All experience difficulty obtaining the kingdom, and its discovery remains tentative even for those in the right line of work.

scholarly journals The relational responding task: toward a new implicit measure of beliefs

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan De Houwer ◽  
Niclas Heider ◽  
Adriaan Spruyt ◽  
Arne Roets ◽  
Sean Hughes
Keyword(s):  
Implicit Measure ◽  
Relational Responding

scholarly journals The relational responding task (RRT): a novel approach to measuring social meaning of language variation

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (s1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Rosseel ◽  
Dirk Speelman ◽  
Dirk Geeraerts
Keyword(s):  
Native Speakers ◽  
Language Attitudes ◽  
Social Meaning ◽  
Implicit Attitude ◽  
Implicit Measure ◽  
Relational Responding ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
The Social ◽  
Attitude Measures ◽  
The Relationship

AbstractRecently, sociolinguistic attitude research has adopted a number of new implicit attitude measures developed in social psychology. Especially the Implicit Association Test (IAT) has proven a successful new addition to the sociolinguist’s toolbox. Despite its relative success, the IAT has a number of limitations, such as the fact that it measures the association between two concepts (e.g. ‘I’ and ‘skinny’) without controlling for the relationship between those two concepts (e.g. ‘I am skinny’ vs. ‘I want to be skinny’). The Relational Responding Task (RRT), a novel implicit attitude measure recently developed by social psychologists, makes up for exactly that limitation by presenting participants with full propositions expressing beliefs rather than loose concepts. In this paper, we present a study that explores the RRT as a novel implicit measure of language attitudes. We employ the method to investigate the social meaning of two varieties of Dutch: Standard Belgian Dutch and colloquial Belgian Dutch. In total 391 native speakers of Belgian Dutch took part in the study. A training effect in the data aside, our results show that the latter variety is associated with dynamism, while the former is perceived as prestigious.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document