The effect of continuous bite jumping on the dentofacial complex: A follow-up study after Herbst appliance treatment of Class II malocclusions

1981 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 660-661
Author(s):  
T.M. Graber
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2(S)) ◽  
pp. 21-24
Author(s):  
Bruno Di Leonardo ◽  
Luca Contardo ◽  
Riccardo Riatti

In this case report, Authors describe the correction of a class II malocclusion using only an Herbst appliance palatally anchored with miniscrews. Before sagittal correction in the same appliance we applied a palatal screw to obtain maxillary expansion. The device were removed after 12 months of treatment. The final result included the correction of Class II malocclusion by lower dentoalveolar compensation mainly. The lip function favorite the spontaneous correction of upper frontal torque with consequent improvement of facial esthetics. After a follow up of 12 months the clinical result is satisfactory in terms of occlusion and esthetics. This clinical case showed a simple orthopedic and dentoalveolar approach to correct transversal discrepancy, dental class II malocclusion and also frontal proclination only with one appliance in a very short treatment time.


2014 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. 735-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Pancherz ◽  
Hanna Salé ◽  
Krister Bjerklin

ABSTRACT Objective:  To analyze radiographic signs of temperomandibular joint (TMJ) osteoarthritis and clinical TMJ symptoms in patients 6 years and 32 years after treatment with a Herbst appliance. Materials and Methods:  Fourteen patients were derived from a sample of 22 with Class II division 1 malocclusions consecutively treated with a banded Herbst appliance at the age of 12–14 years old (T1-T2). The subjects were reexamined after therapy at the ages of 20 years (T3) and 46 years (T4). The TMJs of the 14 patients were analyzed radiographically (conventional lateral tomography at T3 and cone-beam computed tomography at T4) and clinically/anamnestically at T3 and T4. Results:  Six years after Herbst therapy, signs of osteoarthritis were seen in one patient. At the 32-year follow-up, two additional patients had developed signs of osteoarthritis. At the 6-year follow-up, TMJ clicking was present in two patients, though none of the patients reported TMJ pain. At the 32-year follow-up, six patients had TMJ clicking and one patient had TMJ pain. Conclusions:  This longitudinal very-long-term follow-up study after Herbst therapy revealed only minor problems from the TMJ. The TMJ findings 6 years and 32 years after Herbst treatment corresponded to those in the general population. Thus, in the very long term, the Herbst appliance does not appear to be harmful to the TMJ.


1980 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. D. Stephens ◽  
T. G. Lloyd

Spontaneous improvement in molar occlusion is often assumed to accompany orthodontic treatment of the Class II Division I case where all pre-molars have been removed. The investigation shows that while the buccal occlusion generally improves after the completion of removable appliance treatment this is seldom enough to correct a Class II molar relationship.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document