Identification and determination of butyltin compounds by gas chromatography—ion trap spectrometry

1992 ◽  
Vol 262 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphanie Reader ◽  
Emilien Pelletier
2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrizia Stefanelli ◽  
Danilo Attard Barbini ◽  
Silvana Girolimetti ◽  
Angela Santilio ◽  
Roberto Dommarco

RSC Advances ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (80) ◽  
pp. 42424-42431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Notardonato ◽  
Pasquale Avino ◽  
Giuseppe Cinelli ◽  
Mario Vincenzo Russo

2005 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 1834-1839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas G Tsiropoulos ◽  
Konstantinos Liapis ◽  
Dimitrios T Likas ◽  
George E Miliadis

Abstract Analytical methodology was developed and validated for the determination of spiroxamine residues in grapes, must, and wine by gas chromatography/ion trap-mass spectrometry (GC/IT-MS). Two extraction procedures were used: the first involved grapes, must, and wine extraction with alkaline cyclohexane–dichloromethane (9 + 1, v/v) solution, and the second grape extraction with acetone, dichloromethane, and petroleum ether. In both procedures, the extract was centrifuged, evaporated to dryness, and reconstituted in cyclohexane or 2,2,4-trimethylpentane–toluene (9 + 1, v/v), respectively. Spiroxamine diastereomers A and B were determined by GC/IT-MS, and a matrix effect was observed in the case of grapes but not in must and wine. Recovery of spiroxamine from fortified samples at 0.02 to 5.0 mg/kg ranged from 78–102% for grapes and must, with relative standard deviation (RSD) <13%; for red and white wines, recoveries ranged from 90 to 101% with RSD <9%. The limit of quantification was 0.02 mg/kg for grapes, must, and wine or 0.10 mg/kg for grapes, depending on the extraction procedure used.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document