Some theorems concerning the motion of an electrically charged particle in a dipole magnetic field

1962 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 334
2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. I. Jiménez-Aquino ◽  
R. M. Velasco ◽  
F. J. Uribe

1990 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 715-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadayoshi Murakami ◽  
Tetsuya Sato ◽  
Akira Hasegawa

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 045005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anuj Ram Baitha ◽  
Ayesha Nanda ◽  
Sargam Hunjan ◽  
Sudeep Bhattacharjee

2009 ◽  
Vol 399 (1) ◽  
pp. L44-L48 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Esposito ◽  
M. Burgay ◽  
A. Possenti ◽  
R. Turolla ◽  
S. Zane ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 456-478
Author(s):  
J. Marvin Herndon

Earth’s magnetic field acts as a shield, protecting life and our electrically-based infrastructure from the rampaging, charged-particle solar wind. In the geologic past, the geomagnetic field has collapsed, with or without polarity reversal, and inevitably it will again. The potential consequences of geomagnetic collapse have not only been greatly underestimated, but governments, scientists, and the public have been deceived as to the underlying science. Instead of trying to refute or advance a paradigm shift that occurred in 1979, global geoscientists, individuals and institutions, chose to function as a cartel and continued to promote their very-flawed concepts that had their origin in the 1930s and 1940s, consequently wasting vast amounts of taxpayer-provided research money, and making no meaningful advances or understanding. Here, from a first person perspective, I describe the logical progression of understanding from that paradigm shift, review the advances made and their concomitant implications, and touch upon a few of the many efforts that were made to deceive government officials, scientists, and the public. It is worrisome that geoscientists almost universally have engaged in suppressing or ignoring sound scientific advances, including those with potentially adverse implications for humanity. All of this suggests that the entire institutional structure of the geophysical sciences, funding, institutions, and bureaucracies should be radically reformed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document