scholarly journals Insulin-like growth factor: insulin or serum increase phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 during transition of stationary chick embryo fibroblasts into early G1 phase of the cell cycle

FEBS Letters ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 185-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gisela K. Haselbacher ◽  
René E. Humbel ◽  
George Thomas
1984 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 1807-1814
Author(s):  
J Campisi ◽  
A B Pardee

The control of eucaryotic cell proliferation is governed largely by a series of regulatory events which occur in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. When stimulated to proliferate, quiescent (G0) 3T3 fibroblasts require transcription, rapid translation, and three growth factors for the growth state transition. We examined exponentially growing 3T3 cells to relate the requirements for G1 transit to those necessary for the transition from the G0 to the S phase. Cycling cells in the G1 phase required transcription, rapid translation, and a single growth factor (insulin-like growth factor [IGF] I) to initiate DNA synthesis. IGF I acted post-transcriptionally at a late G1 step. All cells in the G1 phase entered the S phase on schedule if either insulin (hyperphysiological concentration) or IGF I (subnanomolar concentration) was provided as the sole growth factor. In medium lacking all growth factors, only cells within 2 to 3 h of the S phase were able to initiate DNA synthesis. Similarly, cells within 2 to 3 h of the S phase were less dependent on transcription and translation for entry into the S phase. Cells responded very differently to inhibited translation than to growth factor deprivation. Cells in the early and mid-G1 phases did not progress toward the S phase during transcriptional or translational inhibition, and during translational inhibition they actually regressed from the S phase. In the absence of growth factors, however, these cells continued progressing toward the S phase, but still required IGF at a terminal step before initiating DNA synthesis. We conclude that a suboptimal condition causes cells to either progress or regress in the cell cycle rather than freezing them at their initial position. By using synchronized cultures, we also show that in contrast to earlier events, this final, IGF-dependent step did not require new transcription. This result is in contrast to findings that other growth factors induce new transcription. We examined the requirements for G1 transit by using a chemically transformed 3T3 cell line (BPA31 cells) which has lost some but not all ability to regulate its growth. Early- and mid-G1-phase BPA31 cells required transcription and translation to initiate DNA synthesis, although they did not regress from the S phase during translational inhibition. However, these cells did not need IGF for entry into the S phase.


1990 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. C. Kallincos ◽  
J. C. Wallace ◽  
G. L. Francis ◽  
F. J. Ballard

ABSTRACT Chicken insulin-like growth factor-II (cIGF-II) has been characterized by amino acid sequencing, by its receptor and binding protein interactions and by its biological activities in cultured cells in order to help define the significance of the peptide in the growth process. Chicken IGF-II has an N-terminal region and several amino acid substitutions in the mid-peptide region that differ from the mammalian growth factor. Nevertheless, cIGF-II was indistinguishable from ovine IGF-II in all assay systems, including those involving chicken receptors and chicken binding proteins. Thus the amino acid substitutions did not modify the biological activities. In chick embryo fibroblasts, labelled bovine IGF-II or cIGF-II bound to a receptor with size and specificity properties expected for a type 1 IGF receptor, except that IGF-I competition for binding was less than IGF-II competition. No evidence for a type 2 receptor was obtained. The relatively lower biological activity of IGF-I compared with IGF-II in chick embryo fibroblasts contrasts with the much higher potency of IGF-I in rat L6 myoblasts. This difference can be explained by a combination of an inhibitory, IGF-II-specific binding protein produced only by the rat cells as well as the unusual receptor specificity of the chicken cells. Journal of Endocrinology (1990) 124, 89–97


1989 ◽  
Vol 258 (1) ◽  
pp. 267-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Ross ◽  
G L Francis ◽  
L Szabo ◽  
J C Wallace ◽  
F J Ballard

(1) Many cell types secrete insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding proteins that can be expected to sequester free IGF and modify the biological activities of the growth factors. (2) A binding protein purified from bovine kidney (MDBK) cells potently inhibited the ability of IGF-2 to stimulate DNA synthesis or protein accumulation as well as to reduce rates of protein breakdown in chick embryo fibroblasts. The binding protein did not influence the biological activities of des-(1-3)-IGF-1, while effects on IGF-1 were intermediate. Since the chick embryo fibroblasts contain only the type 1 IGF receptor, the MDBK-cell binding protein must have reduced the accessibility of IGF-2 and IGF-1 to that receptor. Binding to the type 2 receptor on L6 myoblasts was also inhibited. (3) Inhibiting effects on both protein breakdown responsiveness to IGF and IGF binding to cell receptors were also observed with human amniotic fluid binding protein, although here IGF-1 and IGF-2 were equipotent. These results contrast with stimulatory responses on different IGF-1 actions of the same binding protein reported previously [Elgin, Busby & Clemmons (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84, 3254-3258]. (4) The biological potencies of IGF-1, IGF-2 and des-(1-3)-IGF-1 correlate inversely with their binding to proteins released into the medium by cells, so that the enhanced potency of des-(1-3)-IGF-1 is a consequence of it not binding to purified binding proteins or those released by cultured cells.


Biochimie ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 67 (10-11) ◽  
pp. 1185-1190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luc Cynober ◽  
Christian Aussel ◽  
Pierre Chatelain ◽  
Michel Vaubourdolle ◽  
Jean Agneray ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 1807-1814 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Campisi ◽  
A B Pardee

The control of eucaryotic cell proliferation is governed largely by a series of regulatory events which occur in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. When stimulated to proliferate, quiescent (G0) 3T3 fibroblasts require transcription, rapid translation, and three growth factors for the growth state transition. We examined exponentially growing 3T3 cells to relate the requirements for G1 transit to those necessary for the transition from the G0 to the S phase. Cycling cells in the G1 phase required transcription, rapid translation, and a single growth factor (insulin-like growth factor [IGF] I) to initiate DNA synthesis. IGF I acted post-transcriptionally at a late G1 step. All cells in the G1 phase entered the S phase on schedule if either insulin (hyperphysiological concentration) or IGF I (subnanomolar concentration) was provided as the sole growth factor. In medium lacking all growth factors, only cells within 2 to 3 h of the S phase were able to initiate DNA synthesis. Similarly, cells within 2 to 3 h of the S phase were less dependent on transcription and translation for entry into the S phase. Cells responded very differently to inhibited translation than to growth factor deprivation. Cells in the early and mid-G1 phases did not progress toward the S phase during transcriptional or translational inhibition, and during translational inhibition they actually regressed from the S phase. In the absence of growth factors, however, these cells continued progressing toward the S phase, but still required IGF at a terminal step before initiating DNA synthesis. We conclude that a suboptimal condition causes cells to either progress or regress in the cell cycle rather than freezing them at their initial position. By using synchronized cultures, we also show that in contrast to earlier events, this final, IGF-dependent step did not require new transcription. This result is in contrast to findings that other growth factors induce new transcription. We examined the requirements for G1 transit by using a chemically transformed 3T3 cell line (BPA31 cells) which has lost some but not all ability to regulate its growth. Early- and mid-G1-phase BPA31 cells required transcription and translation to initiate DNA synthesis, although they did not regress from the S phase during translational inhibition. However, these cells did not need IGF for entry into the S phase.


2002 ◽  
Vol 366 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Jameel SHAH ◽  
Scot R. KIMBALL ◽  
Leonard S. JEFFERSON

Considerable biochemical and pharmacological evidence suggests that the activation of ribosomal protein S6 kinases (S6Ks) by activated receptor tyrosine kinases involves multiple co-ordinated input signals. However, the identities of many of these inputs remain poorly described, and their precise involvement in S6K activation has been the subject of great investigative effort. In the present study, we have shown that 4-amino-5-(4-methylphenyl)-7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine (PP1), a selective inhibitor of the Src family of non-receptor tyrosine kinases, interferes with the activation of 70 and 85kDa S6K gene products (p70S6K1 and p85S6K1) by insulin, insulin-like growth factor 1, sodium orthovanadate and activated alleles of phosphoinositide 3-kinase and H-Ras. PP1 also impedes the activation of AKT/protein kinase B and the extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases 1 and 2 by these various stimuli. Insulin-like growth factor 1 was observed to induce a sustained increase in c-Src autophosphorylation as revealed using anti-phospho-Y416 antisera, but this effect was absent from the cells treated with PP1. To conclude, an activated allele of p70S6K1 is compared with the wild-type allele, resistant to inhibition by PP1 when co-expressed with phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 (PDK1), suggesting that PP1 affects p70S6K1 via a PDK1-independent pathway. Thus activation of Src may supply a necessary signal for the activation of p70S6K1 and possibly other S6Ks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document