Investigating prediction capability of HEC-1 and KINEROS kinematic wave runoff models

1994 ◽  
Vol 157 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 87-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.Obiukwu Duru ◽  
Allen T. Hjelmfelt
1997 ◽  
Vol 36 (8-9) ◽  
pp. 57-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Homayoun Motiee ◽  
Bernard Chocat ◽  
Olivier Blanpain

This paper presents a model for the hydraulic simulation of a drainage network using the storage concept. This model is easier to use than the complete Barre de Saint Venant equations and gives better results than the usual conceptual models, i.e. the Muskingum model, or than models obtained by the simplification of the Saint Venant equations (kinematic wave model and diffusion wave model).


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 2546
Author(s):  
Xinyi Guo ◽  
Bihong Fu ◽  
Jie Du ◽  
Pilong Shi ◽  
Qingyu Chen ◽  
...  

It is crucial to explore a suitable landslide susceptibility model with an excellent prediction capability for rapid evaluation and disaster relief in seismic regions with different lithological features. In this study, we selected two typical seismic events, the Jiuzhaigou and Minxian earthquakes, which occurred in the Alpine karst and loess regions, respectively. Eight influencing factors and five models were chosen to calculate the susceptibility of landslide, including the information (I) model, certainty factor (CF) model, logistic regression (LR) model, I + LR coupling model, and CF + LR coupling model. Then, the accuracy and the landslide susceptibility distribution of these models were assessed by the area under curve (AUC) and distribution criteria. Finally, the model with high accuracy and good applicability for the rock landslide or loess landslide regions was optimized. Our results showed that the accuracy of the coupling model is higher than that of the single models. Except for the LR model, the landslide susceptibility distribution for the above-mentioned models is consistent with universal cognition. The coupling models are generally better than their single models. Among them, the I + LR model can obtain the best comprehensive results for assessing the distribution and accuracy of both rock and loess landslide susceptibility, which is helpful for disaster relief and policy-making, and it can also provide useful scientific data for post-seismic reconstruction and restoration.


1993 ◽  
Vol 145 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 65-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Laguna ◽  
J.V. Giráldez

Eos ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (16) ◽  
pp. 199-199
Author(s):  
P. Julien

2014 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Ricci ◽  
Paola Alippi ◽  
Alessio Filippetti ◽  
Vincenzo Fiorentini

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document