Effects of soybean protease inhibitors on the growth and development of larval Helicoverpa armigera

1993 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 657-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.A. Johnston ◽  
J.A. Gatehouse ◽  
J.H. Anstee
Data in Brief ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 1602-1605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yojana R. Chikate ◽  
Vishal V. Dawkar ◽  
Ranjit S. Barbole ◽  
Priyadarshini V. Tilak ◽  
Vidya S. Gupta ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-278
Author(s):  
Monika Mishra ◽  
Aarti Sharma ◽  
Vinay Dagar ◽  
Sarita Kumar

Helicoverpa armigera is a global agricultural pest of serious concern. Continued use of chemical insecticides as control measures has raised grave health and environment concerns, necessitating a search for botanicals as safe alternatives. The current study investigates the effects of ?-sitosterol, a bioactive phytocomponent in Thevetia neriifolia, on the growth and development, as well as on midgut enzymes of H. armigera. Dietary ?-sitosterol produced dose-dependent systemic toxicity and growth inhibitory effects in H. armigera; the most significant effects were obtained with 10 ?g/mL dietary ?-sitosterol. Higher prepupal and pupal mortality in comparison to larval mortality and a comparatively greater reduction in average weight gained by later instars point to cumulative effects of ?-sitosterol. The delayed effects were ascertained by the 82.05%-57.89% reduction in adult emergence in comparison to 95.02% emergence in controls. Dose-dependent effects of ?-sitosterol were observed as significantly decreased enzyme activities of alanine aminotransaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransaminase (AST) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in the larval midgut. Suppression of enzyme activity was obtained in the order ALT>AST>ALP. Impaired activity of gut enzymes possibly lowered the energy reserves and affected nutrient transport through the gut epithelium, affecting the growth and development of H. armigera. Our study points to a promising use of ?-sitosterol against H. armigera, although further examination and field studies are needed to ascertain its possible use in control programs.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. e0194150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Prakash Saini ◽  
Venkat Raman ◽  
Gurusamy Dhandapani ◽  
Era Vaidya Malhotra ◽  
Rohini Sreevathsa ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liu Ya-hui ◽  
Li Bao-ping

AbstractA single choice test was performed to examine developmental strategies in the uniparental endoparasitoidMeteorus pulchricornisand its host, the cotton bollwormHelicoverpa armigera. The results support the dome-shaped model in which the fitness functions are ‘dome-shaped’ relative to size (and age) of host at parasitism. Older and, hence, larger host larvae were simply not better hosts for the developing parasitoids. Although parasitoid size (measured as cocoon weight and adult hind tibia length) was positively correlated with host instars at parasitism, parasitoids developing in larger hosts (L5and L6) suffered much higher mortality than conspecifics developing in smaller hosts (L2–L4). Furthermore, egg-to-adult development time inM. pulchricorniswas significantly longer in older host larvae (L4–L6) than in the younger. Performance ofM. pulchricornis, as indicated by fitness-related traits, strongly suggests that the L3host is the most suitable for survival, growth and development of the parasitoid, followed by both L2and L4hosts; whereas, L1, L5and L6are the least favourable hosts. The oviposition tendency ofM. pulchricornis, represented by parasitism level, was not perfectly consistent with the performance of the offspring; L2–L4hosts, although with the same parasitism level, had offspring parasitoids with differences in fitness-related performance. Larval development inHelicoverpa armigerawas usually suspended, but occasionally advanced, in the final instar.


2018 ◽  
Vol 95 ◽  
pp. 17-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nidhi S. Saikhedkar ◽  
Rakesh S. Joshi ◽  
Ashiwini S. Bhoite ◽  
Radhika Mohandasan ◽  
Amit Kumar Yadav ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. e1008901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenwen Wang ◽  
Guijie Wang ◽  
Xiaorong Zhuo ◽  
Yu Liu ◽  
Lin Tang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document