Use of a scanning laser three-dimensional digitizer to evaluate dimensional accuracy of dental impression materials

1992 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald C. Quick ◽  
James R. Holtan ◽  
Greg K. Ross
2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 243-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepa T. Chandran ◽  
Daryll C. Jagger ◽  
Robert G. Jagger ◽  
Michele E. Barbour

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naveen S Yadav ◽  
Teerthesh Jain ◽  
Amrita Pandita ◽  
SMA Feroz ◽  
Pradeep LNU ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Aim Aim of the present study was to comparatively evaluate dimensional accuracy of newely introduced elastomeric impression material after repeated pours at different time intervals. Materials and methods In the present study a total of 20 (10 + 10) impressions of master model were made from vinyl polyether silicone and vinyl polysiloxane impression material. Each impression was repeatedly poured at 1, 24 hours and 14 days. Therefore, a total of 60 casts were obtained. Casts obtained were scanned with three-dimensional (3D) laser scanner and measurements were done. Results Vinyl polyether silicone produced overall undersized dies, with greatest change being 0.14% only after 14 days. Vinyl polysiloxane produced smaller dies after 1 and 24 hours and larger dies after 14 days, differing from master model by only 0.07% for the smallest die and to 0.02% for the largest die. Conclusion All the deviations measured from the master model with both the impression materials were within a clinically acceptable range. Clinical significance In a typical fixed prosthodontic treatment accuracy of prosthesis is critical as it determines the success, failure and the prognosis of treatment including abutments. This is mainly dependent upon fit of prosthesis which in turn is dependent on dimensional accuracy of dies, poured from elastomeric impressions. How to cite this article Pandita A, Jain T, Yadav NS, Feroz SMA, Pradeep, Diwedi A. Evaluation and Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Newly Introduced Elastomeric Impression Material using 3D Laser Scanners: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(2):265-268.


Measurement ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. 436-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faruk Emir ◽  
Simel Ayyildiz ◽  
Bulent Piskin ◽  
Cumhur Sipahi

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 572-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heike RUDOLPH ◽  
Michael R. S. GRAF ◽  
Katharina KUHN ◽  
Stephanie RUPF-KÖHLER ◽  
Alfred EIRICH ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 244-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sávio Marcelo Leite Moreira da Silva ◽  
Milton Carlos Gonçalves Salvador

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dimensional stability of heavy and light bodied condensation silicones after immersion in disinfectant solution for 10 or 20 minutes. The impression materials were Optosil Comfort and Xantopren VL Plus and the disinfectant solutions were 1% sodium hypochlorite and 2% glutaraldehyde. Impressions were made on a perforated stainless steel tray, according to the American Dental Association specification No. 19, adding up to a total of 50 samples. The double mixing method (one time, two viscosities) was used. Impressions were removed from the roulette block after 7 minutes to ensure complete curing and then immersed in the solutions. Impressions not submitted to treatment composed the control group. After these steps, the impressions were removed from the solution, rinsed in running water and air-dried. Three-dimensional measurements were calculated using an optic microscope graduated at 0.001 mm. The two-way ANOVA indicated no differences (p>0.05) for any combination between variables. The results showed that the solution studied can be safely used to disinfect condensation silicone in clinical prosthodontic procedures.


2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 1397-1406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heike Rudolph ◽  
Sebastian Quaas ◽  
Manuela Haim ◽  
Jörg Preißler ◽  
Michael H. Walter ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (10) ◽  
pp. 2317-2319
Author(s):  
Claudia Florina Andreescu ◽  
Oana Botoaca ◽  
Horia Mihail Barbu ◽  
Doina Lucia Ghergic ◽  
Anamaria Bechir ◽  
...  

There are many steps in fabrication of dental crowns and bridges at which an error can occur, and a technician can only fabricate a quality restoration if the impression itself is of adequate quality. All dental practitioners should have the ability to evaluate the quality of dental impression before sending to the laboratory. Elastomeric silicones (polysiloxane) are the most utilised impression materials in dental practice. The present study deal with the deficiencies of silicones dental impressions sent to commercial dental laboratories for fabrication of single crowns and bridges.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document