Computerized contact thermography in breast patient selection and dynamic follow-up of the effects of hormonal therapy

1987 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 58
Author(s):  
B. Cupeeaneu ◽  
C. Cotrutǎ
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Kavsur ◽  
C Iliadis ◽  
C Metze ◽  
M Spieker ◽  
V Tiyerili ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Recent studies indicate that careful patient selection is key for the percutaneous edge-to-edge repair via MitraClip procedure. The MIDA Score represents a useful tool for patient selection and is validated in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR). Aim We here assessed the potential benefit of the MIDA Score for patients with functional or degenerative MR undergoing edge-to-edge mitral valve repair via the MitraClip procedure. Methods In the present study, we retrospectively included 520 patients from three Heart Centers undergoing MitraClip implantation for MR. All parameters of the MIDA Score were available in these patients, consisting of the 7 variables age, symptoms, atrial fibrillation, left atrial diameter, right ventricular systolic pressure, left-ventricular end-systolic diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction. According to the median MIDA-Score of 9 points, patients were stratified in to a high and a low MIDA Score group and association with all-cause mortality was evaluated. Moreover, MR was assessed in echocardiographic controls in 370 patients at discharge, 279 patients at 3-months and 222 patients at 12 months after MitraClip implantation. Results During 2-years follow-up after MitraClip implantation, 69 of 291 (24%) patients with a high MIDA Score and 25 of 229 (11%) patients with a low MIDA Score died. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log rank test showed inferior rates of death in patients with a low score (p<0.001) and multivariate cox regression revealed an odds ratio of 0.54 (0.31–0.95; p=0.032) regarding 2-year survival in this group. Moreover, one point increase in the MIDA Score was associated with a 1.18-fold increase in the risk for mortality (1.02–1.36; p=0.025). Comparing patients with a high MIDA Score and patients with a low score, post-procedural residual moderate/severe MR tended to be more frequent in patients with a high MIDA Score at discharge (53% vs 43%; p=0.061), 3-months (50% vs 40%; p=0.091) and significantly at 12-months follow-up (52% vs 37%; p=0.029). Conclusion The MIDA Mortality Risk Score remained its predictive ability in patients with degenerative or function MR undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair. Moreover, a high MIDA score was associated with a higher frequency of post-procedural residual moderate/severe MR, indicating a lower effectiveness of this procedure in these patients. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vahid Zangouri ◽  
Hamid Nasrollahi ◽  
Ali Taheri ◽  
Majid Akrami ◽  
Peyman Arasteh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and objective Currently no definite guideline exists on the use of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) among patients with early stage BC. We report our experiences with IORT among breast cancer (BC) patients in our region.Methods All patient who received radical IORT from April 2014 on to March 2020 were included in the study. Patient selection criteria were as followed: age equal or older than 45 years old; all cases of invasive carcinomas, moreover in lobular carcinomas only after MRI and confirmation, and in cases with ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) only those with low, intermediate grade, tumor size of equal or less than 2.5cm and a margin of 2-3mm; those between 45 and 50 years old with a tumor size of 0-2cm, those between 50 and 55 years old with a tumor size of 2-2.5cm, and those ≥55 years old with a tumor size of 2.5-3cm; those with invasive tumors a negative margin and in cases of DCIS a margin of 3mm; a negative nodal status (exception in patients with micrometastasis); and a positive estrogen receptor status. Results Overall, 252 patients entered the study. Mean (SD) age of patients was 56.43±7.79 years. In total, 32.9% of patients had a family history of BC. Mean tumor size was 1.56±0.55 cm. Median (IQR) follow-up of patients was 24 (13, 36) months. Overall, 6 patients (2.4%) experienced recurrence in follow-up visits, among which three (1.2%) were local recurrence, two (0.8%) were regional recurrence and one patients (0.4%) had metastasis.Median (IQR) time to recurrence was 23 (13, 36) among the six patient who had recurrence. Overall, 11 patients (4.3%) with DCIS in our study received IORT. All these patients had free margins in histopathology examination. None of these patients experience recurrence.Conclusion For the first time, we categorized patients according to age and tumor size and older patients with larger tumor sizes were considered appropriate candidates for IORT. Our series showed a successful experience with the use of IORT in a region where facilities for IORT are limited using our modified criteria for patient selection.


2007 ◽  
Vol 2;10 (3;2) ◽  
pp. 291-299
Author(s):  
Michael Gofeld

Background: Evidence for the efficacy of zygapophysial joint nerve radiofrequency neurotomy has remained controversial. Two randomized controlled trials showed positive results, but two others demonstrated no benefit. One carefully performed prospective trial confirmed high efficacy and lasting pain relief after the procedure; however, selection criteria for this study were superfluous, which resulted in a small number of patients available for follow up. Objectives: A large clinical audit with routine patient selection and use of appropriate technique was undertaken to determine the effect of radiofrequency neurotomy of the lumbar facet joints for relief of chronic low back pain. Design: Prospective clinical audit for quality was conducted in the pain clinic affiliated with a tertiary care teaching hospital. Setting: An interventional pain management setting in Canada. Methods: All patients with low back pain of more than 6 months’ duration, with or without non-radicular radiation to the buttock, hip, and leg were included. From January 1991 to December 2000, eligible patients underwent standardized diagnostic work-up, which included a self-reported pain questionnaire, physical examination, review of imaging studies, and diagnostic blockades. Those with an appropriate response to comparative double diagnostic blocks underwent standardized radiofrequency denervation of the lumbar zygapophysial joints. Patients were asked to estimate total perceived pain reduction (on a scale from 0% to 100%) at 6 weeks and at 6, 12, and 24 months after the procedure. Results: Of the 209 patients, 174 completed the study, and 35 were lost to follow-up or did not provide complete data for assessment. Of the 174 patients with complete data, 55 (31.6%) experienced no benefit from the procedure. One hundred and nineteen patients (68.4%) had good (> 50%) to excellent (> 80%) pain relief lasting from 6 to 24 months. Conclusion: This large, prospective clinical audit indicates that proper patient selection and anatomically correct radiofrequency denervation of the lumbar zygapophysial joints provide long-term pain relief in a routine clinical setting. Key words: low back pain, lumbar zygapophysial joint, radiofrequency denervation, clinical audit


Foot & Ankle ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 56-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Aronson ◽  
James Nunley ◽  
Karl Frankovitch

To determine whether definitive radiographic criteria could be elucidated tor the Grice-Green extra-articular subtalar arthrodesis, all 70 cases performed at the Shri-ner's Hospital for Crippled Children, Erie, Pennsylvania, from 1972 to 1980 were reviewed. Patients were followed both clinically and radiographically an average of 4 years and 11 months. Major conclusions were as follows: 1) the standing lateral talocalcaneal angle is the most reliable measurement for operative selection and assessment of postoperative success; and 2) by using strict operative techniques and proper patient selection, a 90% success rate can be expected.


2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (05) ◽  
pp. 162-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samer Ezziddin ◽  
Gerald Antoch ◽  
Thomas Lauenstein ◽  
Holger Amthauer ◽  
Alexander R. Haug ◽  
...  

ZusammenfassungThese guidelines aim to support medical personnel and physicians working in oncology in selecting appropriate patients, in treatment planning, preparation and implementation of SIRT for the treatment of primary and secondary liver malignancies. The focus lies on the requirements in the treatment center with regard to staffing, technical, and organizational aspects including radiation safety. Patient selection need to be performed in an interdisciplinary tumor board including the medical team tasked with the treatment and a medical physics expert. The aims of the treatment, the workup necessary for patient selection and treatment planning, and for avoiding complications are presented as are the requirements for obtaining informed consent from the patient. The follow-up of patients after SIRT also requires interdisciplinary cooperation, including communication with the local family physician.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document