Clinical evaluation of propiomazine as an adjunct to local anesthesia for oral surgical procedures

1964 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-132
Author(s):  
Elliott A. Smart ◽  
Mellor R. Holland
2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (02) ◽  
pp. 103-106
Author(s):  
Ajeet Kumar ◽  
◽  
Naveed Iqbal ◽  
Javaria Farooq ◽  
Saad Uddin Siddiqui

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to compare incidence of perforations in Latex and Nitrile examination gloves during Minor Oral surgical procedures performed under local anesthesia. METHODOLOGY: 100 pairs of latex and 100 pairs of Nitrile examination gloves where used to perform 200 minor oral surgical procedures under local anesthesia. After completion of every minor oral surgical procedure each gloves was examined by Water Inflation method to observe presence or absence of Perforations. A data sheet was used to collect data including type of Gloves used (Latex or Nitrile) presence of perforations, sites of perforations and nature of minor oral surgical procedures. Data was entered and analyzed using SPSS version 20. Descriptive analysis was conducted to calculate frequency and percentages of Number and sites of perforations for both Nitrile and latex examination gloves. Chi Square test was used to find out statistical significance of difference of perforations rate between Nitrile and Latex gloves. P value of < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Out of 200 latex gloves 23 (11.5) had 29 perforations whereas out of total 200 Nitrile gloves 28 (14%) had 22 perforations. Nitrile gloves had a statistically significant higher rate of perforations as compared to Latex gloves. (P value 0.043). For both Nitrile and Latex gloves left non dominant hand had highest frequency of perforations Latex 18 (81.81%) perforations and Nitrile 18(62.06%). Index finger and thumb were most frequent sites of perforations in both Latex and Nitrile gloves. CONCLUSION: Gloves perforations were more common in Nitrile examination gloves however total number of perforations was more in Latex examination gloves.


1963 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 1270-1275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Williams ◽  
Macey Keyes ◽  
David J. Becker ◽  
Richard A. Williams ◽  
Fred Wasserman

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-180
Author(s):  
Bhagyashree R Kohale ◽  
Amit A Agrawal ◽  
Dinesh Erlewad

ABSTRACT Introduction Profound local anesthesia (LA) is necessary in order to reduce patient discomfort during oral surgical procedures. However, injection technique itself may be a potentially painful procedure. A comfortable and consistent LA can increase the level of trust between the patient and the operator, since even a thought of intraoral injection causes a considerable amount of anxiety in many patients. To reduce this anxiety, a computer-controlled local anesthesia delivery (CCLAD) system is commercially available as a possible means of minimizing the sensation of pain (especially for palatal injections). Aim The aim of the present study was to compare the pain perception, when injections were administered using the CCLAD system or a conventional technique in patients requiring oral surgical procedures in the maxillary anterior region. Materials and Methods This randomized split-mouth study included 15 patients (7 females and 8 males). Conventional syringe or computerized single tooth anesthesia (STA) system with a 30-gauge needle was used to give nasopalatine nerve block by the same operator, over a minimum gap of 7 days. Immediately after injection, patient's pain perception was assessed using numeric rating scale (NRS). Overall difference in pain perception and effect of change in sequence of type of anesthesia were determined using unpaired t-test. Results Results of the study showed statistically significant difference between the pain scores of STA system and conventional injection technique; however, the change in sequence of anesthesia technique did not show any effect on the effectiveness of STA system. Conclusion The STA system significantly reduces the pain perception after administration of nasopalatine nerve block in adults. Clinical significance Use of STA system for administration of nasopalatine nerve block in adults provides better patient acceptance and pain control over conventional cartridge syringe. How to cite this article Kohale BR, Agrawal AA, Erlewad D. Comparison of Pain Perception for Nasopalatine Nerve Block using Conventional and Computerized Local Anesthesia Delivery Systems in Adults: A Randomized Split-mouth Clinical Study. J Contemp Dent 2016;6(3):177-180.


2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Semenoff-Segundo ◽  
Fernanda Zanol Matos ◽  
Alessandra Nogueira Porto ◽  
Álvaro Henrique Borges ◽  
Vinicius Canavarros Palma ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 195-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Gerbert ◽  
S Burns ◽  
LA Liedtke

Podiatric surgical procedures frequently involve administration of preoperative local anesthesia, and because of the nature of these blocks, it is believed that needle-free injection could greatly enhance this aspect of clinical practice. The object of the study was to determine if needle-free injections with the Biojector were equivalent to needle and syringe injections for ankle, Mayo, neuroma, hallux, and digital anesthetic blocks. The results indicate that needle-free injection with the Biojector is equal to needle and syringe for some anesthesia blocks. More research in this area is needed to determine if technique with the Biojector has an impact on time of anesthesia onset or on level of discomfort and ecchymosis.


1990 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 2205-2209 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Heimdahl ◽  
G Hall ◽  
M Hedberg ◽  
H Sandberg ◽  
P O Söder ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulkadir Burak Çankaya ◽  
Çağrı Akçay ◽  
Neşe Kahraman ◽  
Banu Gürkan Köseoğlu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document