Disruption of conditioned taste aversion by ECS: The role of lithium chloride

1986 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1193-1195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel Shaw
1990 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Fox ◽  
Merylee Corcoran ◽  
Kenneth R. Brizzee

The relationship between vomiting and conditioned taste aversion was studied in intact cats and squirrel monkeys and in cats and squirrel monkeys in which the area postrema was ablated by thermal cautery. In cats conditioned 7 – 12 months after ablation of the area postrema, three successive treatments with xylazine failed to produce either vomiting or conditioned taste aversion to a novel fluid. Intact cats, however, vomited and formed a conditioned aversion. In squirrel monkeys conditioned 6 months after ablation of the area postrema, three treatments with lithium chloride failed to produce conditioned taste aversion. Intact monkeys did condition with these treatments. Neither intact nor ablated monkeys vomited or evidenced other signs of illness when injected with lithium chloride. When the same ablated cats and monkeys were exposed to a form of motion that produced vomiting prior to surgery, conditioned taste aversion was produced and some animals vomited. These findings confirm other studies indicating motion can produce vomiting in animals with the area postrema destroyed and demonstrate that motion-induced conditioned taste aversion can be produced after ablation of the area postrema. The utility of conditioned taste aversion as a measure of subemetic motion sickness is discussed by examining agreement and disagreement between identifications of motion sickness by conditioned taste aversion and vomiting. It is suggested that a convincing demonstration of the utility of conditioned taste aversion as a measure of nausea requires the identification of physiological correlates of nausea, and caution should be exercised when attempting to interpret conditioned taste aversion as a measure of nausea.Key words: area postrema, conditioned taste aversion, motion sickness, nausea, emesis.


Appetite ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Sparkes ◽  
V.L Grant ◽  
B.T Lett

2000 ◽  
Vol 114 (5) ◽  
pp. 875-881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanna Tassoni ◽  
Carlo Ambrogi Lorenzini ◽  
Elisabetta Baldi ◽  
Benedetto Sacchetti ◽  
Corrado Bucherelli

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justine Chia ◽  
Kristin Scott

AbstractThe ability to modify behavior based on prior experience is essential to an animal’s survival. For example, animals may become attracted to a previously neutral odor or reject a previously appetitive food source upon learning. In Drosophila, the mushroom bodies (MBs) are critical for olfactory associative learning and conditioned taste aversion, but how the output of the MBs affects specific behavioral responses is unresolved. In conditioned taste aversion, Drosophila shows a specific behavioral change upon learning: proboscis extension to sugar is reduced after a sugar stimulus is paired with an aversive stimulus. While studies have identified MB output neurons (MBONs) that drive approach or avoidance behavior, whether the same MBONs impact proboscis extension behavior is unknown. Here, we tested the role of MB pathways in modulating proboscis extension and identified 10 MBON split-GAL4 lines that upon activation significantly decreased proboscis extension to sugar. Activating several of these lines also decreased sugar consumption, revealing that these MBONs have a general role in modifying feeding behavior beyond proboscis extension. Although the MBONs that decreased proboscis extension and ingestion are different from those that drive avoidance behavior in another context, the diversity of their arborizations demonstrates that a distributed network influences proboscis extension behavior. These studies provide insight into how the MB flexibly alters the response to taste compounds and modifies feeding decisions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document