The family health history workbookBy Marnie Mahoney and Ronnie Lichtman, CNM. New York: William Morrow, 1982. 320 pages. $12.95, softcover

1986 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-59
2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 640-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jielu Lin ◽  
Christopher S. Marcum ◽  
Melanie F. Myers ◽  
Laura M. Koehly

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 809-817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gemme Campbell-Salome ◽  
Emily A. Rauscher ◽  
Jennifer Freytag

Family communication environments can be a facilitator or barrier to family cooperation and communication in collecting family health history (FHH) information, which can facilitate disease prevention. This study examined the direct and indirect effects of family communicative environments on whether individuals actively collected FHH information, as well as how age and sex differences complicate this relationship. Participants ( N = 203) completed online surveys, answering close-ended questions about their family’s communication patterns, how open their family is to communicating about FHH, and whether they have actively collected FHH information. Results show there was a direct effect between open family communicative environments and active collection, and found FHH communication openness was a positive partial mediator. Conversely, family environments stressing hierarchy and homogeneity of beliefs inhibit open communication about and collection of a FHH. Analysis of age and sex as moderators in the models showed a significant conditional indirect effects, which grew stronger as participants’ age increased. Furthermore, results showed open family communicative environments lead to active collection of FHH for women, but not for men. Results confirm the importance of family communicative environments in facilitating or inhibiting FHH collection. Findings from the current study provide intervention points for practitioners to advise patients on the importance of collecting a FHH and guide behaviors to collect FHH information based on the family communicative environment.


2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 233-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Goodson ◽  
L.S. Chen ◽  
A. Muenzenberger ◽  
L. Xu ◽  
E. Jung

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. e049058
Author(s):  
Sara Filoche ◽  
Maria H Stubbe ◽  
Rebecca Grainger ◽  
Bridget Robson ◽  
Karyn Paringatai ◽  
...  

ObjectivesFamily health history underpins genetic medicine. Our study aimed to explore language and patterns of communication relating to family health history observed in interactions between general practitioners (GPs) and their patients within routine primary care consultations.DesignSecondary analysis of patient and GP routine consultation data (n=252).ParticipantsConsultations that included ‘family health history’ were eligible for inclusion (n=58).Primary outcomesA qualitative inductive analysis of the interactions from consultation transcripts.Results46/58 conversations about family health history were initiated by the GP. Most discussions around family history lasted for between approximately 1 to 2 min. Patients were invited to share family health history through one of two ways: non-specific enquiry (eg, by asking the patient about ‘anything that runs in the family’); or specific enquiry where they were asked if they had a ‘strong family history’ in relation to a particular condition, for example, breast cancer. Patients often responded to either approach with a simple no, but fuller negative responses also occurred regularly and typically included an account of some kind (eg, explaining family relationships/dynamics which impeded or prevented the accessibility of information).ConclusionsFamily health history is regarded as a genetic test and is embedded in the sociocultural norms of the patient from whom information is being sought. Our findings highlight that it is more complex than asking simply if ‘anything’ runs in the family. As the collection of family health history is expected to be more routine, it will be important to also consider it from sociocultural perspectives in order to help mitigate any inequities in how family history is collected, and therefore used (or not) in a person’s healthcare. Orientating an enquiry away from ‘anything’ and asking more specific details about particular conditions may help facilitate the dialogue.


Author(s):  
Amal Ponathil ◽  
Necmettin Firat Ozkan ◽  
Jeffrey Bertrand ◽  
Brandon Welch ◽  
Kapil Chalil Madathil

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 1558-1564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Murray ◽  
Monica A. Giovanni ◽  
Elissa Klinger ◽  
Elise George ◽  
Lucas Marinacci ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 311-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Lee Smith ◽  
Erica T. Sosa ◽  
Angela K. Hochhalter ◽  
Julie Covin ◽  
Marcia G. Ory ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document