scholarly journals An interrater reliability study of the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery Form-II quantitative scoring system

1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-163
Author(s):  
J Kashden
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ros Whelan ◽  
Eric Prince ◽  
David M. Mirsky ◽  
Robert Naftel ◽  
Aashim Bhatia ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEPediatric adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas (ACPs) are histologically benign brain tumors that confer significant neuroendocrine morbidity. Previous studies have demonstrated that injury to the hypothalamus is associated with worsened quality of life and a shorter lifespan. This insight helps many surgeons define the goals of surgery for patients with ACP. Puget and colleagues proposed a 3-tiered preoperative and postoperative grading system based on the degree of hypothalamic involvement identified on MRI. In a prospective cohort from their institution, the authors found that use of the system to guide operative goals was associated with decreased morbidity. To date, however, the Puget system has not been externally validated. Here, the authors present an interrater reliability study that assesses the generalizability of this system for surgeons planning initial operative intervention for children with craniopharyngiomas.METHODSA panel of 6 experts, consisting of pediatric neurosurgeons and pediatric neuroradiologists, graded 30 preoperative and postoperative MRI scans according to the Puget system. Interrater reliability was calculated using Fleiss’ κ and Krippendorff’s α statistics.RESULTSInterrater reliability in the preoperative context demonstrated moderate agreement (κ = 0.50, α = 0.51). Interrater reliability in the postoperative context was 0.27 for both methods of statistical evaluation.CONCLUSIONSInterrater reliability for the system as defined is moderate. Slight refinements of the Puget MRI grading system, such as collapsing the 3 grades into 2, may improve its reliability, making the system more generalizable.


Author(s):  
Faeze Salahshour ◽  
Mohammad-Mehdi Mehrabinejad ◽  
Mohssen Nassiri Toosi ◽  
Masoumeh Gity ◽  
Hossein Ghanaati ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Michael Welner ◽  
Kate Y. O’Malley ◽  
James Gonidakis ◽  
Samantha Blair

In violent crime cases, aggravating factors in United States criminal codes, such as “heinous,” “atrocious,” or “depraved,” are used to distinguish elements of the crime warranting more severe sentencing. These aggravating terms are vaguely defined and applied arbitrarily in violent cases. This paper details the development of a 25 item Depravity Standard to operationalize an evidence-based approach to distinguishing the worst of violent crimes. The items were applied to 393 detailed case files drawn from several American jurisdictions to develop and refine the item definitions, determine interrater reliability, and mine for the frequency of each item’s occurrence. This information was combined with 1,590 participant responses ranking the relative depravity of each item to develop a straightforward scoring system for measuring depravity in violent cases. The Depravity Standard guide can seamlessly be applied to identify the worst violent crimes, and provide support for those cases that may deserve leniency or early-release.


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel B. Chidley ◽  
Alexandra L. MacGregor ◽  
Caoimhe Martin ◽  
Calum A. Arthur ◽  
Jamie H. Macdonald

Purpose:To identify physiological, psychological, and skill characteristics that explain performance in downhill (DH) mountainbike racing.Methods:Four studies were used to (1) identify factors potentially contributing to DH performance (using an expert focus group), (2) develop and validate a measure of rider skill (using video analysis and expert judge evaluation), (3) evaluate whether physiological, psychological, and skill variables contribute to performance at a DH competition, and (4) test the specific contribution of aerobic capacity to DH performance.Results:Study 1 identified aerobic capacity, handgrip endurance, anaerobic power, rider skill, and self-confidence as potentially important for DH. In study 2 the rider-skill measure displayed good interrater reliability. Study 3 found that rider skill and handgrip endurance were significantly related to DH ride time (β = –0.76 and –0.14, respectively; R2 = .73), with exploratory analyses suggesting that DH ride time may also be influenced by self-confidence and aerobic capacity. Study 4 confirmed aerobic capacity as an important variable influencing DH performance (for a DH ride, mean oxygen uptake was 49 ± 5 mL · kg−1 · min−1, and 90% of the ride was completed above the 1st ventilatory threshold).Conclusions:In order of importance, rider skill, handgrip endurance, self-confidence, and aerobic capacity were identified as variables influencing DH performance. Practically, this study provides a novel assessment of rider skill that could be used by coaches to monitor training and identify talent. Novel intervention targets to enhance DH performance were also identified, including self-confidence and aerobic capacity.


2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 226-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Will P. Rodgers ◽  
Andrew J. Durnford ◽  
Fenella J. Kirkham ◽  
Andrea Whitney ◽  
Mark A. Mullee ◽  
...  

Object Interrater reliability as measured by the kappa (κ) statistic is a widely used and valuable tool to measure the robustness of a scoring system. Seizure frequency reduction is a central outcome measure following vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). A specific VNS scoring system has been proposed by McHugh, but its interrater reliability has not been tested. The authors assessed its interrater reliability and compared it with that of the Engel and International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) systems. Methods Using the Engel, ILAE, and McHugh scoring systems, 3 observers independently rated the medical records of children who had undergone vagus nerve stimulator implantation between January 2001 and April 2011 at the Southampton University Hospital. The interrater agreements were then calculated using the κ statistic. Results Interrater reliability for the McHugh scale (κ0.693) was very good and was superior to those of the Engel (κ0.464) and ILAE (κ0.491) systems for assessing outcome in patients undergoing VNS. Conclusions The authors recommend considering the McHugh scoring system when assessing outcomes following VNS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document