Interrater reliability of a method to assess hypothalamic involvement in pediatric adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ros Whelan ◽  
Eric Prince ◽  
David M. Mirsky ◽  
Robert Naftel ◽  
Aashim Bhatia ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEPediatric adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas (ACPs) are histologically benign brain tumors that confer significant neuroendocrine morbidity. Previous studies have demonstrated that injury to the hypothalamus is associated with worsened quality of life and a shorter lifespan. This insight helps many surgeons define the goals of surgery for patients with ACP. Puget and colleagues proposed a 3-tiered preoperative and postoperative grading system based on the degree of hypothalamic involvement identified on MRI. In a prospective cohort from their institution, the authors found that use of the system to guide operative goals was associated with decreased morbidity. To date, however, the Puget system has not been externally validated. Here, the authors present an interrater reliability study that assesses the generalizability of this system for surgeons planning initial operative intervention for children with craniopharyngiomas.METHODSA panel of 6 experts, consisting of pediatric neurosurgeons and pediatric neuroradiologists, graded 30 preoperative and postoperative MRI scans according to the Puget system. Interrater reliability was calculated using Fleiss’ κ and Krippendorff’s α statistics.RESULTSInterrater reliability in the preoperative context demonstrated moderate agreement (κ = 0.50, α = 0.51). Interrater reliability in the postoperative context was 0.27 for both methods of statistical evaluation.CONCLUSIONSInterrater reliability for the system as defined is moderate. Slight refinements of the Puget MRI grading system, such as collapsing the 3 grades into 2, may improve its reliability, making the system more generalizable.

2020 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. S382
Author(s):  
S. Kroeze ◽  
P. Mackeprang ◽  
C. De Angelis ◽  
M. Walser ◽  
A. Pica ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaac Odame ◽  
JoAnn Duckworth ◽  
Danielle Talsma ◽  
Lesley Beaumont ◽  
William Furlong ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Scoccianti ◽  
Beatrice Detti ◽  
Samantha Cipressi ◽  
Alberto Iannalfi ◽  
Ciro Franzese ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 137 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lea M. Ventura ◽  
Julie A. Grieco ◽  
Casey L. Evans ◽  
Karen A. Kuhlthau ◽  
Shannon M. MacDonald ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. E1-E14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iori Sato ◽  
Akiko Higuchi ◽  
Takaaki Yanagisawa ◽  
Shiho Murayama ◽  
Toshihiro Kumabe ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Héloïse Bourien ◽  
Elodie Pelotte ◽  
Aurélie Thébault ◽  
Claire Larible-Lefort ◽  
Frédérique Lebrun ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Several studies have highlighted the difficulties faced by caregivers of patients with brain tumors. We created the educational workshops called AGAPE. Their aim is to explain precisely the medical aspects of brain tumors, describe resources available, and allow a moment of exchange between caregivers. Purpose To evaluate outcomes of AGAPE. Methods This was an observational uncontrolled pilot study. Feasibility was evaluated by the caregivers’ attendance of the 2 theoretical scheduled sessions and their satisfaction. Additional outcomes were the percentage of caregivers in favour of AGAPE sustainability and the impact on their quality of life according to CarGOQoL questionnaires (Caregiver Oncology Quality of Life) between baseline before the first workshop and after the last one. Results From February 2015 to March 2019, 12 three-month sessions were organized allowing 87 caregivers to participate. 84% of caregivers attended at least 2 theoretical sessions, the level of satisfaction was very high, and all caregivers were in favor of AGAPE sustainability. 36 caregivers submitted completed questionnaires at baseline and after the last workshop attended, separated by more than 2 months. The first workshop took place mostly during or after the adjuvant treatment of their loved ones. Two-thirds of their loved ones had a progressive disease after the first workshop and 21 died. Caregivers’ quality of life was stable between the first and last attended workshop. Conclusion Our study showed that AGAPE helped to maintain caregiver’s quality of life despite patient’s disease progression and its feasibility. Moreover, AGAPE may easily be run in other hospitals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document