Physiological pharmacokinetic model for ceftazidime disposition in the rat and its application to prediction of plasma concentrations in humans

1993 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Granero ◽  
Jesús Chesa-Jiménez ◽  
Víctor Monserrat ◽  
Mercedes Almela ◽  
María-José Gimeno ◽  
...  
1997 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 884-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Russell Wada ◽  
Sven Bjorkman ◽  
William F. Ebling ◽  
Hideyoshi Harashima ◽  
Sandra R. Harapat ◽  
...  

Background Understanding the influence of physiological variables on thiopental pharmacokinetics would enhance the scientific basis for the clinical usage of this anesthetic. Methods A physiological pharmacokinetic model for thiopental previously developed in rats was scaled to humans by substituting human values for tissue blood flows, tissue masses, and elimination clearance in place of respective rat values. The model was validated with published serum concentration data from 64 subjects. The model was simulated after intravenous thiopental administration, 250 mg, over 1 min, to predict arterial plasma concentrations under conditions of different cardiac outputs, degrees of obesity, gender, or age. Results The human pharmacokinetic model is characterized by a steady state volume of distribution of 2.2 l/kg, an elimination clearance of 0.22 l/min, and a terminal half-life of 9 h. Measured thiopental concentrations are predicted with an accuracy of 6 +/- 37% (SD). Greater peak arterial concentrations are predicted in subjects with a low versus a high cardiac output (3.1 and 9.4 l/min), and in subjects who are lean versus obese (56 and 135 kg). Acutely, obesity influences concentrations because it affects cardiac output. Prolonged changes are due to differences in fat mass. Changes with gender and age are relatively minor. Conclusions The physiological pharmacokinetic model developed in rats predicts thiopental pharmacokinetics in humans. Differences in basal cardiac output may explain much of the variability in early thiopental disposition between subjects.


2003 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 1927-1939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veda Diwadkar-Navsariwala ◽  
Janet A. Novotny ◽  
David M. Gustin ◽  
Jeffery A. Sosman ◽  
Keith A. Rodvold ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (8) ◽  
pp. 4907-4913 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marieke G. G. Sturkenboom ◽  
Leonie W. Mulder ◽  
Arthur de Jager ◽  
Richard van Altena ◽  
Rob E. Aarnoutse ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTRifampin, together with isoniazid, has been the backbone of the current first-line treatment of tuberculosis (TB). The ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0–24) to the MIC is the best predictive pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameter for determinations of efficacy. The objective of this study was to develop an optimal sampling procedure based on population pharmacokinetics to predict AUC0–24values. Patients received rifampin orally once daily as part of their anti-TB treatment. A one-compartmental pharmacokinetic population model with first-order absorption and lag time was developed using observed rifampin plasma concentrations from 55 patients. The population pharmacokinetic model was developed using an iterative two-stage Bayesian procedure and was cross-validated. Optimal sampling strategies were calculated using Monte Carlo simulation (n= 1,000). The geometric mean AUC0–24value was 41.5 (range, 13.5 to 117) mg · h/liter. The median time to maximum concentration of drug in serum (Tmax) was 2.2 h, ranging from 0.4 to 5.7 h. This wide range indicates that obtaining a concentration level at 2 h (C2) would not capture the peak concentration in a large proportion of the population. Optimal sampling using concentrations at 1, 3, and 8 h postdosing was considered clinically suitable with anr2value of 0.96, a root mean squared error value of 13.2%, and a prediction bias value of −0.4%. This study showed that the rifampin AUC0–24in TB patients can be predicted with acceptable accuracy and precision using the developed population pharmacokinetic model with optimal sampling at time points 1, 3, and 8 h.


AIHAJ ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 335-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
MELVIN E. ANDERSEN ◽  
MICHAEL G. MacNAUGHTON ◽  
HARVEY J. CLEWELL III ◽  
DENNIS J. PAUSTENBACH

1989 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 139-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Freeman ◽  
K. K. Rozman ◽  
A. G. E. Wilson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document