Experimental study of the stability of the knee after total knee replacement with a low contact stress prosthesis

The Knee ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Siebel ◽  
F Geiger ◽  
D Poehlmann ◽  
J Heisel
Author(s):  
Michael D Stokes ◽  
Brendan C Greene ◽  
Luke W Pietrykowski ◽  
Taylor M Gambon ◽  
Caroline E Bales ◽  
...  

Current total knee replacement designs work to address clinically desired knee stability and range of motion through a balance of retained anatomy and added implant geometry. However, simplified implant geometries such as bearing surfaces, posts, and cams are often used to replace complex ligamentous constraints that are sacrificed during most total knee replacement procedures. This article evaluates a novel total knee replacement design that incorporates synthetic ligaments to enhance the stability of the total knee replacement system. It was hypothesized that by incorporating artificial cruciate ligaments into a total knee replacement design at specific locations and lengths, the stability of the total knee replacement could be significantly altered while maintaining active ranges of motion. The ligament attachment mechanisms used in the design were evaluated using a tensile test, and determined to have a safety factor of three with respect to expected ligamentous loading in vivo. Following initial computational modeling of possible ligament orientations, a physical prototype was constructed to verify the function of the design by performing anterior/posterior drawer tests under physiologic load. Synthetic ligament configurations were found to increase total knee replacement stability up to 94% compared to the no-ligament case, while maintaining total knee replacement flexion range of motion between 0° and 120°, indicating that a total knee replacement that incorporates synthetic ligaments with calibrated location and lengths should be able to significantly enhance and control the kinematic performance of a total knee replacement system.


Author(s):  
Ahmed M. Samy ◽  
Wael Azzam

AbstractOver many decades, total knee replacement (TKR) becomes the ideal treatment option for advanced arthritis. Many designs were introduced to increase the stability of the tibial tray, hence the longevity of the prosthesis. This retrospective study was performed on 168 patients who received NexGen cemented primary total knee either with standard tibial tray (group A) or tibial tray with an intramedullary stem (group B) between May 2008 and May 2017. We reviewed all preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiological data retrospectively. In addition, a prospective clinical and radiological reassessment was done. Our aim was to answer the following questions: (1) Is there any difference between both groups in regard to clinical and radiological results? (2) Is there any difference in the revision rate? (3) Is there a role of using stemmed tibial tray in primary TKR? Better results were recorded in obese and severely obese patients having stemmed cemented tibial tray and so for patients with marked and severe preoperative varus angle. Our recommendations are to use cemented tibial tray with a stem in complicated primary surgery without fear of adverse effects on short and intermediate terms of follow-up.


2010 ◽  
Vol 92 (8) ◽  
pp. 1765-1773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Hamai ◽  
Hiromasa Miura ◽  
Shuichi Matsuda ◽  
Takeshi Shimoto ◽  
Hidehiko Higaki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document