Smoking and something else: Professor Simon Wolff, Toxicologist, explains how diesel can give smokers lung cancer, and a biologically ignorant but numerate layman dissects the specious claptrap of The world's most eminent cancer specialist, Professor Sir Richard Doll, and explains why he received the general motors cancer prize in 1979

1994 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 753
Author(s):  
James P. Lodge
Lung Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 139 ◽  
pp. S89-S90
Author(s):  
M. Hill ◽  
R. Naseer ◽  
M. Davies

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. e0172568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Wook Shin ◽  
Young Il Kim ◽  
Seung Joon Kim ◽  
Jung Soo Kim ◽  
SeMin Chong ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (149) ◽  
pp. 180045 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashanya Malalasekera ◽  
Sharon Nahm ◽  
Prunella L. Blinman ◽  
Steven C. Kao ◽  
Haryana M. Dhillon ◽  
...  

Earlier access to lung cancer specialist (LCS) care improves survival, highlighting the need for streamlined patient referral. International guidelines recommend 14-day maximum time intervals from general practitioner (GP) referral to first LCS appointment (“GP–LCS interval”), and diagnosis to treatment (“treatment interval”). We compared time intervals in lung cancer care against timeframe benchmarks, and explored barriers and facilitators to timely care.We conducted a scoping review of literature from MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and hand searches. Primary end-points were GP–LCS and treatment intervals. Performance against guidelines and factors responsible for delays were explored. We used descriptive statistics and nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum tests to compare intervals in studies reporting fast-track interventions.Of 1343 identified studies, 128 full-text articles were eligible. Only 33 (26%) studies reported GP–LCS intervals, with an overall median of 7 days and distributions largely meeting guidelines. Overall, 52 (41%) studies reported treatment intervals, with a median of 27 days, and distributions of times falling short of guidelines. There was no effect of fast-track interventions on reducing time intervals. Lack of symptoms and multiple procedures or specialist visits were suggested causes for delay.Although most patients with lung cancer see a specialist within a reasonable timeframe, treatment commencement is often delayed. There is regional variation in establishing timeliness of care.


2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 640-650.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Apar Kishor Ganti ◽  
Fred R. Hirsch ◽  
Murry W. Wynes ◽  
Arliene Ravelo ◽  
Suresh S. Ramalingam ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1786-1792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig C. Earle ◽  
Peter J. Neumann ◽  
Richard D. Gelber ◽  
Milton C. Weinstein ◽  
Jane C. Weeks

PURPOSE: To determine the extent to which unexplained variation in the use of chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer is due to access to oncologists’ services as opposed to treatment decisions made after seeing an oncologist. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 12,015 patients over age 65 diagnosed with metastatic lung cancer between 1991 and 1996 while living in one of 11 regions monitored by a Survival, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) tumor registry. Assessment by an oncologist and subsequent treatment with chemotherapy were determined by examining linked Medicare claims. RESULTS: Of patients who did not receive chemotherapy, 36% were never assessed by a physician who provides chemotherapy. Patients living in certain areas, those diagnosed in more recent years, and those who received care in a teaching hospital were all more likely to see a cancer specialist. These factors were unrelated to subsequent treatment decisions, however. Conversely, age and comorbidity did not have a significant effect on whether a patient was seen by an oncologist, but they were associated with the likelihood of subsequently receiving chemotherapy. Black race, probably acting as a proxy for lower socioeconomic status, was associated with both a diminished likelihood of seeing a cancer specialist and subsequently receiving chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Nonmedical factors are important determinants of whether a lung cancer patient is seen by a physician who provides chemotherapy. After seeing such a physician, treatment decisions seem to be mostly explained by appropriate medical factors. Racial and socioeconomic disparities still exist at both steps, however. As therapeutic options expand, referring physicians must ensure that biases and barriers to care do not deprive patients of the opportunity to consider all of their treatment options.


Lung Cancer ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. S20
Author(s):  
M. Peake ◽  
C. Alcock ◽  
S. Hunt ◽  
G. Healy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document