Depression And HIV/TB In Southern Africa: A Mixed Method Evaluation of An Integrated Primary Care Mental Health Programme In Eswatini

Background: Depression and comorbidity with chronic illnesses is common in Southern Africa, yet there are major treatment gaps. This study evaluates the intervention ‘Healthy Activity Program’ to bridge this gap, which involves training non-specialist nurses in depression: including identification, counselling based on behavioural activation theory and structured referral. This intervention aims to be integrated into routine primary healthcare services for HIV/TB. The patient cohort were people living with HIV and/or tuberculosis (TB) (PLHIV/TB) in rural Eswatini. Aims: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of this intervention and concepts of depression in this setting.Methods: This is a pragmatic mixed methods evaluation of a pilot integrated service.Results: 324 PLHIV/TB were screened for depression, with 19% (62/324) screening positive. Attendance to counselling declined over time, with 16/62 attending the minimum 5 sessions. Qualitative results indicated acceptability, yet concerns around feasibility. Conclusions: The ‘Healthy Activity Program’ represents a promising option to manage the treatment gap for depression in PLHIV/TB. However, task-shifting onto non-specialist healthcare professionals with the aim to integrate care for these conditions in primary care, without increasing staff capacity, is a barrier to implementation. Realistic and pragmatic assessments of capacity and workforce are essential.

Nurse-led early evaluation following corticosteroid prescription in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Background: The Toronto consensus for management of ulcerative colitis (UC) recommends early evaluation of UC patients 2 weeks after initiation on corticosteroids. A system for early evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease patients was established by specialist nurses in a secondary care centre. Aim: To compare outcomes following early evaluation to the previous service. Methods: All patients undergoing early evaluation over a 1-year period were prospectively audited and compared to a retrospective cohort of patients receiving prednisolone in the preceding year. Findings: Of 140 patients included, 76 (54.3%) underwent early evaluation. All patients in the early evaluation group received drug education and details of the nurse helpline (17.1% of patients did not already have this). Of patients, 81.6% were prescribed Adcal, and 83.9% were on 5-aminosalicylates. Fewer admissions were observed within 6 months following early evaluation (8.6% vs. 23.4%, p=0.013). Conclusion: Multiple benefits of early evaluation were observed, including a potential reduction in hospital admissions.

Perceived barriers and enablers influencing physical activity in heart failure: a qualitative one-to-one interview study

In heart failure (HF), increased physical activity is associated with improved quality of life, reduced hospitalisation, and increased longevity and is an important aim of treatment. However, physical activity levels in individuals living with HF are typically extremely low. This qualitative study with one-to-one interviews systematically explores perceived clinical, environmental, and psychosocial barriers and enablers in older adults (>70 years old) living with HF. Semi-structured interviews (N = 16) based on the Theoretical Domains Framework elicited 78 belief statements describing the barriers and enablers to physical activity. Theoretical domains containing these beliefs and corresponding constructs that were both pervasive and common were deemed most relevant. These were: concerns about physical activity (Beliefs about Consequences), self-efficacy (Beliefs about Capabilities), social support (Social Influences), major health event (Environmental Context and Resources), goal behavioural (Goal), action planning (Behavioural Regulation). This work extends the limited research on the modifiable barriers and enablers for physical activity participation by individuals living with HF. The research findings provide insights for cardiologists, HF-specialist nurses, and physiotherapists to help co-design and deliver a physical activity intervention more likely to be effective for individuals living with HF.

Positive Effect of a Successfully Implemented Model of Care on Unplanned Transfers to Hospital

Models of care have shown effectiveness in reducing unplanned transfers in nursing homes (NHs) from 11.7% to 6.1%. These include coordination of care and access to skilled medical providers such as geriatricians, specialist nurses or registered nurses with additional training. A hybrid type-2 effectiveness-implementation project (INTERCARE) was developed to improve intervention uptake and to understand the mechanisms behind results. INTERCARE consisted of six core elements and was rolled-out to 11 Swiss NHs with a stepped-wedge design allowing all NHs to receive the intervention. 942 residents were recruited (June 2018 -January 2020). INTERCARE showed a significant reduction of unplanned transfers during the intervention period compared with baseline. The successful implementation of INTERCARE relied on the use of implementation science, building on stakeholder input and careful theory-driven contextual adaptations. INTERCARE’s success was driven by registered nurses with expanded roles, on-site coaching, and the use of tools for clinical decision making.

Defining Appropriate Resources for Nursing Homes to Reduce Potentially Avoidable Transfers After a Fall

Falls are common in nursing home (NH) residents and are the predominant reason for an emergency department (ED) transfer. Falls are responsible for 25% - 87% of ED transfers, a proportion of which are potentially avoidable. INTERCARE – an implementation science study reducing unplanned hospitalizations (2018 – 2020) – involved experts to identify potentially avoidable fall-related transfers. Focus group and stakeholder survey enabled identification of resources to safely manage some falls in NHs. 25.9% of fall-related transfers were potentially avoidable based on using root-cause analysis and discharge reports. Avoidability was associated to ED visit, compared to hospitalizations. Appropriate resources identified by stakeholders included timely access to outpatient services for diagnostic imaging (e.g., X-Ray) and clinical skills’ training in suturing and wound care for registered or specialist nurses. Although NHs are striving for a home-like environment, better access to basic diagnostic and treatment services within NHs should be possible.

The Impact of Remote Urology Outpatient Clinics during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Introduction: The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic of 2020 had a major impact on NHS services. From the 23rd of March 2020, the Urology Department in Basingstoke initiated telephone-led consultation clinicsinstead of face-to-face outpatient appointments, in accordance with U.K. guidance.Objectives: To evaluate patient experience and satisfaction following the introduction of remote (telephone) consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic.Patients and methods: The first 200 remote patient appointments between the 30th of March 2020 and the 16th of April 2020 were sent a postal questionnaire (19 questions relating to their experience and level of satisfaction with the interaction). Telephone consultations were conducted by 6 consultants, 3 registrars, and 2 specialist nurses. The patients were not prewarned to expect a questionnaire after the remote ap-pointment. The associated cost saving resulting from a switch from face-to-face appointments to remote telephone appointments was also calculated.Results: 100 out of the 200 patients responded within 1 month (response rate 50%). A total of 44% of the patients were new referrals, while 56% were follow-ups. Overall, the feedback was positive regarding the telephone consultation, with 88% rating the care received as excellent or very good. In addition, 90% would recommend a telephone consultation to family and friends. However, 35% would prefer in the future to have another telephone consultation rather than face-to-face consultation, with 46% preferring a face-to-face appointment in the future and 19% unsure. For new patients, the proportion wishing to have a face-to-face appointment, in the end, was unsurprisingly higher than it was for those undergoing a follow-up (39% vs. 7 %). In these 2 weeks, the cost reduction to the NHS from shifting from face-to-face consultation to telephone consultation was estimated to be £6500.Conclusions: Telephone urology clinics are a satisfactory alternative to face-to-face appointments for many of our patients now and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. They are efficient, cost-effective, and feasible to undertake urological consultation and can be implemented successfully in selected patients. The feedback from this questionnaire would suggest that priority should be given to face-to-face appointments for new patients and for complex follow-up appointments. Telephone follow-up appointments, however, are a good approach for the majority of patients.

Development, reliability and validity of infectious disease specialist Nurse’s Core competence scale

Aim This study aims to develop an instrument to measure infectious disease specialist nurses’ core competence and examining the scale’s validity and reliability. Background With the increase of infectious diseases, more and more attention has been paid to infectious disease nursing care. The core competence of the infectious disease specialist nurses is directly related to the quality of nursing work. In previous researches, infectious disease specialist nurses’ core competence was measured by the tools developed for general nurses instead of specialized tools, which made it difficult to clarify the core competence of nurses in infectious diseases department. Methods Preliminary items were developed through literature review, theoretical research, qualitative interview and Delphi method. The confirmed 47 items were applied in the two rounds of data collection. Evaluation data on 516 infectious disease specialist nurses’ core competence in the first round were utilized to preliminarily evaluate and explore the scale’s constrution, while evaluation data on 497 infectious disease specialist nurses’ core competence in the second round were utilized to do reliability analysis and validity analysis. In this study, factor analysis, Cronbach’s α, Pearson correlation coefficients were all adopted. Results The final scale is composed of 34 items and 5 factors, and adopted the 5-point scoring method. The factors are Professional Development Abilities, Infection Prevention and Control Abilities, Nursing Abilities for Infectious Diseases, Professionalism and Humanistic Accomplishment, and Responsiveness to Emergency Infectious Diseases. The explanatory variance of the five factors was 75.569%. The reliability and validity of the scale is well validated. The internal consistency, split-half reliability and test-retest reliability were 0.806, 0.966 and 0.831 respectively. The scale has good structural validity and content validity. The content validity was 0.869. Discrimination analysis showed that there were significant differences in the scores of core competence and its five dimensions among infectious disease specialist nurses of different ages, working years in infectious diseases, titles, educational background, marital status and wages (all P < 0.05). Conclusions The proposed scale takes on high reliability and validity, and is suitable for assessing the infectious disease specialist nurses’ core competence. Relevance to clinical practice This scale provides a reference for clinical assessment of infectious disease nursing.

Inflammatory bowel disease nurses' views on taking on a new role to support an online self-management programme for symptoms of fatigue, pain and urgency: a qualitative study to maximise intervention acceptance

Background: Patients can be empowered through self-managing their inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) symptoms. It is important to understand how specialist IBD nurses can practically support patients to do this. Aim: To explore the perceptions of IBD specialist nurses about the implementation of a proposed nurse-guided online cognitive behavioural self-management intervention to manage symptoms of fatigue, pain and urgency. Methods: Five semi-structured focus groups (45 participants) were conducted with IBD nurses, and themes were identified through thematic analysis. Findings: Four themes were identified: (1) role of nurse as a facilitator; (2) nurse competence in facilitating the intervention; (3) nurse perception of patient needs; and (4) intervention implementation. Conclusions: The results of this study helped to refine the proposed guided online intervention with a view to sustainable implementation in clinical practice. Refinements included in-depth training and minimisation of additional workload for nurses through reducing patient contact, including an online messaging system for communication with patients.

Improving mesothelioma follow-up care in the UK: a qualitative study to build a multidisciplinary pyramid of care approach

ObjectivesThe findings reported in this manuscript are part of a wider study that aimed to explore mesothelioma patients’ experiences of follow-up care. The aim of this phase of the study was to co-produce recommendations for policy and practice and to propose a revised, patient-focused, mesothelioma follow-up care service.DesignThe consultation phase was qualitative and consisted of three group discussions with separate stakeholder groups allowing for different priorities and needs for follow-up care to be compared. An implicit approach to consensus was adopted and data were analysed iteratively using the framework method.SettingThe study was conducted in three National Health Service Trusts in the South of England. Two were secondary care settings and the third was a tertiary centre.ParticipantsThe consultation exercise comprised three group discussions with key stakeholders (n=35): mesothelioma specialist nurses (n=9), mesothelioma patients and carers (n=11) and local clinical commissioning group members (n=15).ResultsRecommendations for mesothelioma follow-up care were developed using a co-production approach and highlighted the importance of continuity of care, the provision of timely information and the central role played by mesothelioma specialist nurses, supported by the wider multidisciplinary team. Recommendations were produced together with two bespoke infographics to maximise impact and facilitate patient and public engagement with the study.ConclusionsThe recommendations developed are the first that specifically examine best practice for the follow-up care pathway for mesothelioma patients. Co-production and public engagement are crucial to priority setting develop and optimising patient-centred care. Combining the recommendations produced with a targeted dissemination strategy and well-designed, patient-focused infographics will maximise opportunities for impact at a regional and national level.