Hotspot and binding site prediction: Strategy to target protein–protein interactions

Author(s):  
Om Silakari ◽  
Pankaj Kumar Singh
2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Amos-Binks ◽  
Catalin Patulea ◽  
Sylvain Pitre ◽  
Andrew Schoenrock ◽  
Yuan Gui ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Qianmu Yuan ◽  
Jianwen Chen ◽  
Huiying Zhao ◽  
Yaoqi Zhou ◽  
Yuedong Yang

Abstract Motivation Protein–protein interactions (PPI) play crucial roles in many biological processes, and identifying PPI sites is an important step for mechanistic understanding of diseases and design of novel drugs. Since experimental approaches for PPI site identification are expensive and time-consuming, many computational methods have been developed as screening tools. However, these methods are mostly based on neighbored features in sequence, and thus limited to capture spatial information. Results We propose a deep graph-based framework deep Graph convolutional network for Protein–Protein-Interacting Site prediction (GraphPPIS) for PPI site prediction, where the PPI site prediction problem was converted into a graph node classification task and solved by deep learning using the initial residual and identity mapping techniques. We showed that a deeper architecture (up to eight layers) allows significant performance improvement over other sequence-based and structure-based methods by more than 12.5% and 10.5% on AUPRC and MCC, respectively. Further analyses indicated that the predicted interacting sites by GraphPPIS are more spatially clustered and closer to the native ones even when false-positive predictions are made. The results highlight the importance of capturing spatially neighboring residues for interacting site prediction. Availability and implementation The datasets, the pre-computed features, and the source codes along with the pre-trained models of GraphPPIS are available at https://github.com/biomed-AI/GraphPPIS. The GraphPPIS web server is freely available at https://biomed.nscc-gz.cn/apps/GraphPPIS. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.


2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Navneet Sidhu ◽  
John F. Dawson

A purified F-actin-derived actin trimer that interacts with end-binding proteins did not activate or bind the side-binding protein myosin under rigor conditions. Remodeling of the actin trimer by the binding of gelsolin did not rescue myosin binding, nor did the use of different means of inhibiting the polymerization of the trimer. Our results demonstrate that ADP-ribosylation on all actin subunits of an F-actin-derived trimer inhibits myosin binding and that the binding of DNase-I to the pointed end subunits of a crosslinked trimer also remodels the myosin binding site. Taken together, this work highlights the need for a careful balance between modification of actin subunits and maintaining protein–protein interactions to produce a physiologically relevant short F-actin complex.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (02) ◽  
pp. 2150006
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Nazem ◽  
Fahimeh Ghasemi ◽  
Afshin Fassihi ◽  
Alireza Mehri Dehnavi

Binding site prediction for new proteins is important in structure-based drug design. The identified binding sites may be helpful in the development of treatments for new viral outbreaks in the world when there is no information available about their pockets with COVID-19 being a case in point. Identification of the pockets using computational methods, as an alternative method, has recently attracted much interest. In this study, the binding site prediction is viewed as a semantic segmentation problem. An improved 3D version of the U-Net model based on the dice loss function is utilized to predict the binding sites accurately. The performance of the proposed model on the independent test datasets and SARS-COV-2 shows the segmentation model could predict the binding sites with a more accurate shape than the recently published deep learning model, i.e. DeepSite. Therefore, the model may help predict the binding sites of proteins and could be used in drug design for novel proteins.


2020 ◽  
pp. 49-69
Author(s):  
Himanshu Avashthi ◽  
Ambuj Srivastava ◽  
Dev Bukhsh Singh

ChemMedChem ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 296-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duncan E. Scott ◽  
Anthony G. Coyne ◽  
Ashok Venkitaraman ◽  
Tom L. Blundell ◽  
Chris Abell ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document