Intravenous Access

2022 ◽  
pp. 167-173
Author(s):  
Daniel Putterman
Keyword(s):  
1997 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holly Herron ◽  
Robert Falcone ◽  
Barb Dean ◽  
Howard Werman

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgan Recher ◽  
Valentine Baert ◽  
Joséphine Escutnaire ◽  
Quentin Le Bastard ◽  
François Javaudin ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 441-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith S Boniface ◽  
Maxine A LeSaux ◽  
Sohaib Mandoorah ◽  
Amit Patel ◽  
Kai L Neander ◽  
...  

Purpose: We evaluated the performance of an encapsulated guidewire designed for single-handed use with ultrasound-guided vascular access (SonoStik) with Seldinger technique, as compared with conventional intravenous catheters placed under ultrasound guidance in healthy subjects. Methods: This is a prospective cohort trial in healthy subjects in which each subject served as his/her own control by having a SonoStik ultrasound intravenous cannulation placed in one arm and a conventionally placed, standard ultrasound intravenous cannulation placed in the other arm. The basilic vein was used because it is a non-visible and non-palpable vein. Emergency department technicians with extensive experience in ultrasound-guided intravenous access performed the procedures. The first-attempt success rate of intravenous-guided intravenous by using the SonoStik was compared to the standard ultrasound intravenous cannulation in adult healthy subjects. The secondary outcomes including time of procedure, technicians’ and subjects’ satisfaction, and complications were compared in both arms of the study. Results: A total of 24 volunteers with a mean age of 22.7 years were enrolled. Four emergency department technicians with extensive prior experience with ultrasound-guided intravenous access but with no prior experience using the SonoStik device performed the procedures. The first-attempt success was 83.3% with the use of SonoStik ultrasound intravenous cannulation compared to 95.8% with the standard ultrasound intravenous cannulation. There was a mean of 1.14 insertions per each successful placement in the SonoStik group compared to 1.04 insertions by using the standard catheters (mean differences = –0.1; 95% confidence interval = –0.6 to 0.4). There were no complications in either SonoStik or the standard ultrasound intravenous cannulation group. The mean time of insertion using SonoStik was slightly longer compared to standard ultrasound intravenous cannulation (143.3 vs 109.7 s). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that emergency department technicians skilled in ultrasound-guided intravenous access could successfully place SonoStik 83.3% of the time in vessels that were unable to be palpated or visualized. Compared to standard ultrasound intravenous cannulation, the odds ratio of successful cannulation with SonoStik was 0.91 (95% confidence interval = 0.04–17.5). In all cases, the time required to successfully insert SonoStik was less than 4 min from tourniquet application to catheter advancement to hub, with a mean time of less than 2.5 min.


2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronit Wollstein ◽  
Alka Palekar
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thea Tislevoll Eide ◽  
Karl Ove Hufthammer ◽  
Atle Brun ◽  
Damien Brackman ◽  
Einar Svarstad ◽  
...  

AbstractMeasurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in children by iohexol injection and blood sampling from the contralateral arm is widely used. A single intravenous access for iohexol injection and subsequent blood sampling has the obvious advantages of being less painful and easier to perform. The purpose of our study was to determine if blood samples drawn from the injection access are feasible and accurate for iohexol GFR (iGFR) measurements. Thirty-one children, median age 10.5 (range 6–17) years, with chronic kidney disease were given a bolus of iohexol followed by extended saline flushing and subsequent venous blood samples collected from the injection access as well as from a cannula in the contralateral arm, the latter serving as the reference method. Paired venous blood samples were collected at four time points (2, 3, 3.5 and 4 h) after the iohexol bolus. Blood sample discarding preceded and saline flushing followed each blood sampling to avoid marker contamination. iGFR based on samples drawn from the injection access at 2 and 3 h showed significantly lower iGFR than measurement from the contralateral arm (p < 0.01). Singlepoint iGFR did not differ significantly after 3–4 repeated procedures of blood discarding and saline flusing (3.5 and 4 h). Despite thorough saline flushing there is still a relatively high risk of falsely low iGFR due to marker contamination in blood samples from the injection site. Hence, blood sampling from a second intravenous access is recommended for routine iohexol GFR measurements in children.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT01092260, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01092260?term=tondel&rank=2.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document