Soil organic carbon dynamics: Impact of land use changes and management practices: A review

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thangavel Ramesh ◽  
Nanthi S. Bolan ◽  
Mary Beth Kirkham ◽  
Hasintha Wijesekara ◽  
Manjaiah Kanchikerimath ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 120 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 37-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua W. Beniston ◽  
S. Tianna DuPont ◽  
Jerry D. Glover ◽  
Rattan Lal ◽  
Jennifer A. J. Dungait

2020 ◽  
Vol 300 ◽  
pp. 106997
Author(s):  
Assefa Abegaz ◽  
Lulseged Tamene ◽  
Wuletawu Abera ◽  
Tesfaye Yaekob ◽  
Habtamu Hailu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Briffaut

<p><strong>EPIC calibration and validation to predict crop yields and soil organic carbon dynamics among different management practices</strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>Authors:</p><p>F. Briffaut<sup>a</sup>, M. Longo<sup>a</sup>. N. Dal Ferro<sup>a</sup>, Furlan L<sup>b</sup>, F. Morari<sup>a </sup></p><p><sup>a</sup>DAFNAE Dept., University of Padova, Viale Dell’Università 16, 35020, Legnaro (PD), Italy</p><p><sup>b</sup> Veneto Agricoltura, Settore Ricerca Agraria, Viale Dell'Università 14, 35020 Legnaro, PD, Italy;</p><p> </p><p>Mathematical models are valuable tools to estimate agronomic and environmental effects of different management practices. Their use could be of interest for the evaluation of long term benefits associated with agri-environmental measures financed by European Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) through the regional Rural Development Programmes (RDP). In this study we focus on the simulation performances of the widely used agri-environmental model EPIC (Environmental Policy Integrated Climate Model). We tested the model ability in simulating crop yields, soil organic carbon (SOC) levels, soil volumetric water content (VWC) and water table depth in 44 plots from three farms located in the low-lying Veneto plain (North Eastern Italy). In each farm, three different management practices were used: conventional agriculture (CV), conservation agriculture (CA) and conventional agriculture with the use of cover crops (CC). The model was tested in the 2010-2017 period, with the first four years used as calibration period and the last as validation period.  We also compared the performance of two subroutines for simulating SOC: PHOENIX and CENTURY.</p><p>Differences among tillage practices were detected in the original data, with CA causing a reduction in yield, in particular for corn and soybean, but also a rise in SOC levels in the most superficial layers with respect to CC and CV managements.</p><p>First results showed that EPIC performance in reproducing crop yields and SOC content was satisfying (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.59 and NSE(Nash – Sutcliffe Efficiency) = 0.61, for crop yields and r<sup>2 </sup>= 0.78 and NSE = 0.76 for SOC), while it was less accurate for VWC and water table dynamic (r<sup>2 </sup>< 0.5 and NSE < 0.0). An improvement in the simulation of soil hydrology was obtained using a modified version of the model which incorporates the Richards equation. Another adaptation was the use of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) to simulate weed infestation in CA managed plots which allowed to improve yields simulations.</p><p>This study demonstrated that EPIC can be a valid tool to predict patterns of environmental parameters under different management scenarios and therefore, once validated to local conditions, it could be used to support public administrations or farmers’ decisions.</p>


2013 ◽  
Vol 64 (8) ◽  
pp. 799 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. R. Hulugalle ◽  
T. B. Weaver ◽  
L. A. Finlay ◽  
V. Heimoana

Long-term studies of soil organic carbon dynamics in two- and three-crop rotations in irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) based cropping systems under varying stubble management practices in Australian Vertosols are relatively few. Our objective was to quantify soil organic carbon dynamics during a 9-year period in four irrigated, cotton-based cropping systems sown on permanent beds in a Vertosol with restricted subsoil drainage near Narrabri in north-western New South Wales, Australia. The experimental treatments were: cotton–cotton (CC); cotton–vetch (Vicia villosa Roth. in 2002–06, Vicia benghalensis L. in 2007–11) (CV); cotton–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), where wheat stubble was incorporated (CW); and cotton–wheat–vetch, where wheat stubble was retained as in-situ mulch (CWV). Vetch was terminated during or just before flowering by a combination of mowing and contact herbicides, and the residues were retained as in situ mulch. Estimates of carbon sequestered by above- and below-ground biomass inputs were in the order CWV >> CW = CV > CC. Carbon concentrations in the 0–1.2 m depth and carbon storage in the 0–0.3 and 0–1.2 m depths were similar among all cropping systems. Net carbon sequestration rates did not differ among cropping systems and did not change significantly with time in the 0–0.3 m depth, but net losses occurred in the 0–1.2 m depth. The discrepancy between measured and estimated values of sequestered carbon suggests that either the value of 5% used to estimate carbon sequestration from biomass inputs was an overestimate for this site, or post-sequestration losses may have been high. The latter has not been investigated in Australian Vertosols. Future research efforts should identify the cause and quantify the magnitude of these losses of organic carbon from soil.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document