scholarly journals 404 Is a change in New York Heart Association functional class a valid measure of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy?

EP Europace ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 87-88
Author(s):  
E. Nof ◽  
O. Gurevitz ◽  
S. Carasso ◽  
D. Bar-Lev ◽  
D. Luria ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 106 (8) ◽  
pp. 1146-1151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rutger J. van Bommel ◽  
Eva van Rijnsoever ◽  
C. Jan Willem Borleffs ◽  
Victoria Delgado ◽  
Nina Ajmone Marsan ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 383-385
Author(s):  
Shinichiro Ikeda ◽  
Hideo Yoshida ◽  
Keiji Yunoki ◽  
Kunikazu Hisamochi

We performed coronary artery grafting, mitral valve plasty, and tricuspid plasty in a 75-year-old man who had double-vessel coronary disease and moderate mitral and tricuspid insufficiency. Preoperative transthoracic echocardiography revealed an ejection fraction of 34% and dyssynchronous wall motion of the septum and free wall. We placed pacing leads on the right ventricular outlet and posterior left ventricular wall for cardiac resynchronization therapy. The dyssynchrony disappeared postoperatively and the New York Heart Association functional class improved from IV to I.


Author(s):  
Niraj Varma ◽  
Robert C. Bourge ◽  
Lynne Warner Stevenson ◽  
Maria Rosa Costanzo ◽  
David Shavelle ◽  
...  

Background Patients with recurring heart failure (HF) following cardiac resynchronization therapy fare poorly. Their management is undecided. We tested remote hemodynamic‐guided pharmacotherapy. Methods and Results We evaluated cardiac resynchronization therapy subjects included in the CHAMPION (CardioMEMS Heart Sensor Allows Monitoring of Pressure to Improve Outcomes in New York Heart Association Class III Heart Failure Patients) trial, which randomized patients with persistent New York Heart Association Class III symptoms and ≥1 HF hospitalization in the previous 12 months to remotely managed pulmonary artery (PA) pressure‐guided management (treatment) or usual HF care (control). Diuretics and/or vasodilators were adjusted conventionally in control and included remote PA pressure information in treatment. Annualized HF hospitalization rates, changes in PA pressures over time (analyzed by area under the curve), changes in medications, and quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire scores) were assessed. Patients who had cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=190, median implant duration 755 days) at enrollment had poor hemodynamic function (cardiac index 2.00±0.59 L/min per m 2 ), high comorbidity burden (67% had secondary pulmonary hypertension, 61% had estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 ), and poor Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire scores (57±24). During 18 months randomized follow‐up, HF hospitalizations were 30% lower in treatment (n=91, 62 events, 0.46 events/patient‐year) versus control patients (n=99, 93 events, 0.68 events/patient‐year) (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51–0.96; P =0.028). Treatment patients had more medication up‐/down‐titrations (847 versus 346 in control, P <0.001), mean PA pressure reduction (area under the curve −413.2±123.5 versus 60.1±88.0 in control, P =0.002), and quality of life improvement (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire decreased −13.5±23 versus −4.9±24.8 in control, P =0.006). Conclusions Remote hemodynamic‐guided adjustment of medical therapies decreased PA pressures and the burden of HF symptoms and hospitalizations in patients with recurring Class III HF and hospitalizations, beyond the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT00531661.


Author(s):  
Xiang-Fei Feng ◽  
Ling-Chao Yang ◽  
Rui Zhang ◽  
Yi Yu ◽  
Bo Liu ◽  
...  

Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy via biventricular pacing is an established therapy for patients with heart failure. However, high nonresponder rates and inability to predict response remains a challenge. Recently left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has been shown to be feasible and may also improve clinical outcomes. In this article we describe sequential LBBAP followed by left ventricular (LV) pacing (LOT-CRT) and assess the feasibility of LOT-CRT. Methods: The RV implantation site was positioned and the LBBAP lead was implanted using our methods. The QRS duration (QRSd) at baseline, during LBBAP, biventricular pacing, and LOT-CRT was measured. Results: LOT-CRT was successful in 5 patients (age 71.8 ± 5.1 years, men 3, ischemic 3). The QRSd at baseline was 158.0 ± 13.0 ms and significantly narrowed to 117.0 ± 6.7 ms during LOT-CRT (P < 0.01). During 3-month follow-up, LV ejection fraction improved from 32.8 ± 5.2 % to 45.0 ± 5.1% (P < 0.01), and New York Heart Association functional class changed from 3.25 ± 0.5 to 2.5 ± 0.6 (P < 0.05). A decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic dimension was observed, with widening from (68.2 ± 12.3) mm at baseline to (62.2 ± 11.3) mm at pacing (P < 0.05). The length of operation time was (152.0 ± 31.1) min. Conclusions: The study demonstrates that LOT-CRT is clinically feasible in patients with systolic HF and LBBB. LOT-CRT was associated with significant narrowing of QRSd and improvement in LV function, especially in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document