A combination of the modified Mallampati score, thyromental distance, anatomical abnormality, and cervical mobility (M-TAC) predicts difficult laryngoscopy better than Mallampati classification

Objective We investigated the “BURP” maneuver’s effect on the association between difficult laryngoscopy and difficult intubation, and predictors of a difficult airway. Methods Adult patients who underwent general anesthesia and tracheal intubation from September 2016 to May 2018 were included. The “BURP” maneuver was performed when glottic exposure was classified as Cormack–Lehane grade 3 or 4, suggesting difficult laryngoscopy. The thyromental distance, modified Mallampati score, and interincisor distance were assessed before anesthesia. Results Among this study’s 2028 patients, the “BURP” maneuver decreased difficult laryngoscopies from 428 (21.1%) to 124 (6.1%) cases and increased the difficult intubation to difficult laryngoscopy ratio from 53/428 (12.4%) to 52/124 (41.9%). For laryngoscopies classified as difficult without the “BURP” maneuver, the area under the curve (AUC) of the thyromental distance, modified Mallampati score, and interincisor distance was 0.60, 0.57, and 0.66, respectively. In difficult laryngoscopies using the “BURP” maneuver, the AUC of the thyromental distance, modified Mallampati score, and interincisor distance was 0.71, 0.67, and 0.76, respectively. Conclusions The “BURP” maneuver improves the laryngoscopic view and assists in difficult laryngoscopies. Compared with difficult laryngoscopies without the “BURP” maneuver, those with the “BURP” maneuver are more closely associated with difficult intubations and are more predictable. Trial registration: www.chictr.org.cn identifier: ChiCTR-ROC- 16009050.

Download Full-text

Acromioaxillosuprasternal Notch Index and Old Head and Anatomic Neck Criteria in Predicting Difficult Laryngoscopy in Tracheal Intubation in Children under General Anesthesia

Internal Medicine And Medical Investigation Journal ◽

10.24200/imminv.v4i1.207 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 4 (2) ◽

Author(s):

Nedasadat Mansouritehrani

Keyword(s):

General Anesthesia ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Neck Circumference ◽

Difficult Laryngoscopy ◽

Sectional Study ◽

Upper Lip ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Better Than

Introduction: Currently, various methods are being used for determining difficult laryngoscopy. The present study aimed to compare the acromioaxillosuprasternal notch index function with the old head and neck anatomic criteria in predicting difficult laryngoscopy with respect to trachea intubation under general anesthesia in children. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 379 children under intubation with general anesthesia entered the study. Patients were divided into two groups: easy laryngoscopy (grades 1 and 2) and difficult laryngoscopy (grades 3 and 4) based on Cormack-Lehane score. The thyromental distance systems, height to thyromental distance, Upper-Lip-Bite test, neck circumference, and acromioaxillosuprasternal notch index were studied and compared. Results: Laryngoscopy was difficult in 48 subjects (38 were grade 3 and 10 were grade 4). Interestingly, no significant difference was detected between easy and difficult laryngoscopies based on the thyromental distance, neck circumference, height to thyromental distance, and acromioaxillosuprasternal notch index (P>0.05). height to thyromental distance , acromioaxillosuprasternal notch index , and neck circumference have a sensitivity of 32.2%, 47.9%, 51.1%, respectively, and the specificity was 52.7%, 45.6%, and 48.9%, respectively. Conclusion: Neck circumference and acromioaxillosuprasternal notch index outperform the height to thyromental distance. On the other hand, Modified Mallampati test is better than Upper-Lip-Bite test in determining difficult laryngoscopy in children.

Download Full-text

Comparative study of various supraglottic devices with clinical and fiber optic assessment in elective laparoscopic procedures

International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences ◽

10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20171256 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 5 (4) ◽

pp. 1514

Author(s):

Bhushan M. Ambare ◽

S. P. Manjrekar ◽

Monika S. Masare

Keyword(s):

Randomized Study ◽

Study Groups ◽

The Other ◽

Gastric Distension ◽

Air Leak ◽

Laryngeal Inlet ◽

Mallampati Score ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Better Than

Background: Aim of present study was to compare the efficacy and safety of supraglottic devices (LMA supreme, LMA proseal and I-Gel) by clinical and fiberoptic evaluation in elective laparoscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation.Methods: The design was a prospective, randomized study enrolling total 105 patients of either sex, (age 18-65 years), ASA grade I/II and mallampati score I and II, were randomly allocated to LS (LMAS), LP (PLMA), and IG (I-Gel) groups according to the supraglottic device applied. The three devices were compared as regards insertion parameters, adequacy of ventilation (oxygen saturation, endtidal carbon dioxide and air leak), fibreoptic vision and intra or postoperative complications.Results: The overall ease of insertion of LMAS was found to be better than the other two devices. Adequacy of ventilation was comparable in all the study groups. Safety of these devices was found to be comparable but if OLP was considered as a marker of safety of the device, LMA proseal was a better option than the other two devices. There was no significant difference in the fiberoptic view of the laryngeal inlet between the three study groups but the number of patients with grade 4 view of laryngeal inlet fiberoptic was more in I gel than LMA proseal and LMA supreme.Conclusions: It was concluded that the LMAS, PLMA and I-Gel are effective ventilatory devices during controlled ventilation, without major complications. But in clinical practice it is advisable to monitor peak airway pressure, OLP and laparoscopic view of gastric distension whenever these devices are used in laparoscopic surgeries.

Download Full-text