Sacrificial 3D printing of shrinkable silicone elastomers for enhanced feature resolution in flexible tissue scaffolds

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 ◽  
pp. 261-272
Author(s):  
Elham Davoodi ◽  
Hossein Montazerian ◽  
Ali Khademhosseini ◽  
Ehsan Toyserkani
2020 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. 110958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Elomaa ◽  
Eriselda Keshi ◽  
Igor Maximilian Sauer ◽  
Marie Weinhart
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (9) ◽  
pp. 3189-3199
Author(s):  
Anna Li Volsi ◽  
Francesca Tallia ◽  
Haffsah Iqbal ◽  
Theoni K. Georgiou ◽  
Julian R. Jones

We report the first enzyme cleavable inorganic–organic hybrid “inks” that can be 3D printed as scaffolds for bone regeneration and investigate the effect of star polymer architecture on their properties.


Author(s):  
Ashutosh Singh ◽  
◽  
Ravi Butola ◽  
Jitendra Bhaskar ◽  

Improvements in soft robotics, materials, and flexible gripper technology made it possible for the soft grippers to advance rapidly. A brief analysis of soft robotic grippers featuring various material collections, physical rules, and system architectures is provided here. Soft gripping is divided into three technologies, enabling gripping with: a) actuation, b) material used, and c) Use of 3D printing in fabricating grippers. An informative analysis is provided of every form. Similar to stiff grippers, flexible and elastic end-effectors may also grab or control a broader variety of objects. The inherent versatility of the materials is increasingly being used to study advanced materials and soft structures, particularly silicone elastomers, shape-memory materials, active polymers, and gels, in the development of compact, simple, and more versatile grippers. For future work, enhanced structures, techniques, and senses play a prominent part.


2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 125022 ◽  
Author(s):  
David McCoul ◽  
Samuel Rosset ◽  
Samuel Schlatter ◽  
Herbert Shea

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
matthias sandmeier ◽  
nevena paunovic ◽  
Riccardo Conti ◽  
Hofmann Leopold ◽  
Jieping Wang ◽  
...  

<p>Vat photopolymerization 3D printing provides new</p><p>opportunities for the fabrication of tissue scaffolds and medical</p><p>devices. However, it usually requires the use of organic solvents or</p><p>diluents to dissolve the solid photoinitators, making this process</p><p>environmentally unfriendly, and not optimal for biomedical</p><p>applications. Here, we report biodegradable liquid polymeric</p><p>photoinitiators for solvent-free 3D printing of biodegradable polymeric</p><p>materials by digital light processing. These photoinitiators enable</p><p>systematic investigation of structure-property relationship of 3D</p><p>printing polymeric materials without the interference from the reactive</p><p>diluents and offer new perspectives for the solvent-free 3D additive</p><p>manufacturing of bioresorbable medical implants as well as other</p><p>functional devices.</p>


ACS Nano ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rongrong Zhang ◽  
Linglong Deng ◽  
Jinhua Guo ◽  
Hongye Yang ◽  
Lina Zhang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (15) ◽  
pp. 14391-14398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingting Zhao ◽  
Ran Yu ◽  
Shan Li ◽  
Xinpan Li ◽  
Ying Zhang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 3308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Rider ◽  
Željka Kačarević ◽  
Said Alkildani ◽  
Sujith Retnasingh ◽  
Reinhard Schnettler ◽  
...  

Three-dimensional (3D) printing has become an important tool in the field of tissue engineering and its further development will lead to completely new clinical possibilities. The ability to create tissue scaffolds with controllable characteristics, such as internal architecture, porosity, and interconnectivity make it highly desirable in comparison to conventional techniques, which lack a defined structure and repeatability between scaffolds. Furthermore, 3D printing allows for the production of scaffolds with patient-specific dimensions using computer-aided design. The availability of commercially available 3D printed permanent implants is on the rise; however, there are yet to be any commercially available biodegradable/bioresorbable devices. This review will compare the main 3D printing techniques of: stereolithography; selective laser sintering; powder bed inkjet printing and extrusion printing; for the fabrication of biodegradable/bioresorbable bone tissue scaffolds; and, discuss their potential for dental applications, specifically augmentation of the alveolar ridge.


2020 ◽  
Vol 387 ◽  
pp. 124142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhu Liu ◽  
Peng Hong ◽  
Ziying Huang ◽  
Ting Zhang ◽  
Ruijie Xu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (26) ◽  
pp. 23573-23583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu-yu Zhou ◽  
Qing Gao ◽  
Jian-zhong Fu ◽  
Qian-yong Chen ◽  
Jia-pei Zhu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document