A survey on radiation exposure reduction methods including rectangular collimation for intraoral radiography by pediatric dentists in the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 151 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-296
Author(s):  
Richard E. Campbell ◽  
Stephen Wilson ◽  
Yin Zhang ◽  
William C. Scarfe
Author(s):  
Erin O. Semmens ◽  
Cindy S. Leary ◽  
Molly R. West ◽  
Curtis W. Noonan ◽  
Kathleen M. Navarro ◽  
...  

1954 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 255 ◽  
Author(s):  
James G. Terrill, Jr. ◽  
Samuel C. Ingraham II ◽  
Dade W. Moeller

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-33
Author(s):  
Traci Saito ◽  
Jae Hyun Park ◽  
Curt Bay

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of white spot lesions (WSLs) in various practice settings and patient populations, and to gather information about the treatment timing and modalities used by pediatric dentists in the United States. Study design: A fourteen question, multiple choice, electronic survey was developed and distributed to 6,092 active American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) members. Results: A total of 625 active members responded, garnering a 9.7% response rate. Before treatment, there were significantly more WSLs reported in Corporate practice than Multi-Doctor Practice (P=0.002), and significantly more WSLs in Academics/Hospital-Based Practices than in Multi-Doctor Practices (P=0.002). For WSLs after treatment, there were significantly more WSLs in Academic/Hospital-Based practices than in single-practitioner settings (P=0.003). Approximately 38% of pediatric dentists preferred to treat WSLs before, during or after orthodontic treatment, while 23% treat only before and 20% treat only after treatment. The three most common treatment modalities for WSLs, were prescription fluoride toothpaste (5000 ppm), fluoride varnish, and fluoride rinse. Approximately 47% of respondents reported they were “very comfortable” treating WSLs and 31.0% felt “comfortable.” Conclusions: The prevalence of WSLs differed across types of practice. There is no agreement among pediatric dentist as to timing and treatment modalities for WSLs.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 684-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel D. Zamoiski ◽  
Elizabeth K. Cahoon ◽  
D. Michal Freedman ◽  
Martha S. Linet ◽  
Cari M. Kitahara

2013 ◽  
Vol 178 (4) ◽  
pp. 521-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.-W. Lin ◽  
D. C. Wheeler ◽  
Y. Park ◽  
M. Spriggs ◽  
A. R. Hollenbeck ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nassim F. Olabi ◽  
James E. Jones ◽  
Mark A. Saxen ◽  
Brian J. Sanders ◽  
LaQuia A. Walker ◽  
...  

The purpose of this study is to explore the use of office-based sedation by board-certified pediatric dentists practicing in the United States. Pediatric dentists have traditionally relied upon self-administered sedation techniques to provide office-based sedation. The use of dentist anesthesiologists to provide office-based sedation is an emerging trend. This study examines and compares these two models of office-based sedations. A survey evaluating office-based sedation of diplomates of the American Board of Pediatric Dentistry (ABPD) based on gender, age, years in practice, practice types, regions, and years as a diplomate of the ABPD was completed by 494 active members. The results were summarized using frequencies and percentages. Relationships of dentist age, gender, and number of years in practice with the use of intravenous (IV) sedation was completed using two-way contingency tables and Mantel-Haenszel tests for ordered categorical data. Relationships of office-based sedation use and the type of one's practice were examined using Pearson chi-square tests. Of the 1917 surveys e-mailed, 494 completed the survey for a response rate of 26%. Over 70% of board-certified US pediatric dentists use some form of sedation in their offices. Less than 20% administer IV sedation, 20 to 40% use a dentist anesthesiologist, and 60 to 70% would use dentist anesthesiologists if one were available.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document