scholarly journals Optical process monitoring in Laser Powder Bed Fusion using a recoater-based line camera

2021 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 102218
Author(s):  
Felix Gabriel Fischer ◽  
Niklas Birk ◽  
Leroy Rooney ◽  
Lucas Jauer ◽  
Johannes Henrich Schleifenbaum
2020 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 607-617
Author(s):  
W. Zouhri ◽  
J.Y. Dantan ◽  
B. Häfner ◽  
N. Eschner ◽  
L. Homri ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Marco Grasso ◽  
Bianca Maria Colosimo ◽  
Kevin Slattery ◽  
Eric MacDonald

2021 ◽  
pp. 102058
Author(s):  
Ronan McCann ◽  
Muhannad A. Obeidi ◽  
Cian Hughes ◽  
Éanna McCarthy ◽  
Darragh S. Egan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 1161 ◽  
pp. 123-130
Author(s):  
Dieter Tyralla ◽  
Thomas Seefeld

Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is a frequently used manufacturing process due to its advantages in lightweight construction, design possibilities and functionalization of geometry. However, the printed parts will often have to undergo time and cost expensive non-destructive testing by sophisticated methods like X-CT. Thus, there is a strong demand to identify suitable online process monitoring techniques that allow to reduce or substitute post-process NDT effort. The temperature field reacts sensitively to deviations during processing, thus online temperature monitoring is a promising approach. In the present work a spatially resolved temperature measurement, based on 2-channel-pyrometry, is used for process monitoring in LPBF. The camera system is coaxially integrated into the beam guidance of the LPBF system. The coaxial observation enables a lateral resolution better than 10 μm over the whole build-up area of 250 x 250 mm2. Single tracks were welded with different parameters and observed by the camera system to identify thermal indicators. Metallographic cross-sections of the tracks were compared with the melt pool width measured by the online observation system. The deviation was ca. 3 %. In addition, cubes of 10 mm by 10 mm by 10 mm are built up. The melt pool area is identified as useful indicator for the process behavior and for the first time the assessment of part density is demonstrated in LPBF during process by the help of a thermal monitoring system.


2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 778-787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon Lane ◽  
Shawn Moylan ◽  
Eric P. Whitenton ◽  
Li Ma

Purpose Quantitative understanding of the temperatures, gradients and heating/cooling rates in and around the melt pool in laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) is essential for simulation, monitoring and controls development. The research presented here aims to detail experiment design and preliminary results of high speed, high magnification, in-situ thermographic monitoring setup on a commercial L-PBF system designed to capture temperatures and dynamic process phenomena. Design/methodology/approach A custom door with angled viewport was designed for a commercial L-PBF system which allows close access of an infrared camera. Preliminary finite element simulations provided size, speed and scale requirements to design camera and optics setup to capture melt pool region temperatures at high magnification and frame rate speed. A custom thermal calibration allowed maximum measurable temperature range of 500°C to 1,025°C. Raw thermographic image data were converted to temperature assuming an emissivity of 0.5. Quantitative temperature results are provided with qualitative observations with discussion regarding the inherent challenges to future thermographic measurements and process monitoring. Findings Isotherms around the melt pool change in size depending on the relative location of the laser spot with respect to the stripe edges. Locations near the edges of a stripe are cooled to lower temperatures than the center of a stripe. Temperature gradients are highly localized because of rough or powdery surface. At a specific location, temperatures rise from below the measurable temperature range to above (<550°C to >1100°C) within two frames (<1.11 m/s). Particle ejection is a notable phenomenon with measured ejection speeds >11.7 m/s. Originality/value Several works are detailed in the Introduction of this paper that detail high-speed visible imaging (not thermal imaging) of custom or commercial LBPF processes, and lower-speed thermographic measurements for defect detection. However, no work could be found that provides calibrated, high-speed temperature data from a melt-pool monitoring configuration on a commercial L-PBF system. In addition, the paper elucidates several sources of measurement uncertainty (e.g. calibration, emissivity and time and spatial resolution), describes inherent measurement challenges based on observations of the thermal images and discusses on the implications to model validation and process monitoring and control.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document